Trans eligibility rules for girls sports.

In related degeneration, the US legacy media is so broken. I googled "chant at us mexico game" to see what was reported about the chant. I started at the top of the page and looked at the stories. I included all context regarding the chants I could find in each story. The interesting one is Fox. Does anyone else have the feeling that Fox has someone with a lot of power threatening to sue them out of existence if they don't toe the legacy media line? You have to get down to clutchpoints.com (wtf is that?) before you get any specific context about the event and to the UK Mirror before you get any actual reporting. Outsports is the first one that identifies the culprits as "Mexico fans". It's hilarious. They aren't even trying. If the cause of an event can't be attributed to one of the sanctioned sources of evil, they don't even bother doing any reporting. It's no wonder faith in the US legacy media continues to drop along with readership. They earned it.

"FIFA has previously fined the Mexican Football Federation for homophobic chants made by the country’s fans."

"FIFA fined Mexico 100,000 Swiss francs ($108,000) in January for anti-gay chants by fans at two games"

FIFA fined Mexico 100,000 Swiss francs ($108,000) in January for anti-gay chants by fans at two games.

<nothing>

FIFA fined Mexico 100,000 Swiss francs ($108,000) in January for anti-gay chants by fans at two games.

This is not the first incident involving anti-gay chants and the Mexico soccer team.
The Mexican Football Federation has tried- to no avail- to prevent these chants from occurring.
The federation was slapped with a $108,000 fine for chants occurring at the 2022 World Cup.

After play was stopped the first time, a message was displayed on the scoreboards calling for fans to stop the homophobic chants. The offensive slurs were heard once again, however, with USMNT goalkeeper Matt Turner the subject of the chants following a final goal kick and Barton eventually blew the full-time whistle early with the USA 3-0 up.
The Mexican Football Federation (FMF) has been issued fines before as a result of similar actions by supporters, including a sanction following a chant heard during the World Cup in 2022 in Qatar.
CONCACAF confirmed that the match officials acted upon protocol during the match and security staff had removed several fans due to their behaviour inside the stadium. The Confederation has now launched an investigation into the events in an attempt to establish further details.

Mexico fans are yet still again chanting an anti-gay slur at American soccer players on U.S. soil during the two teams’ CONCACAF match Thursday night.
 
I have to go now for a few hours. Going to love up on the in laws. I let everyone know my where abouts so no one thinks I'm dodging a question like Espola does. Dude doesn't like to answer a Q and always deflects. It's just his Marxist way of doing things. Love you all and talk soon frens.
 
In related degeneration, the US legacy media is so broken. I googled "chant at us mexico game" to see what was reported about the chant. I started at the top of the page and looked at the stories. I included all context regarding the chants I could find in each story. The interesting one is Fox. Does anyone else have the feeling that Fox has someone with a lot of power threatening to sue them out of existence if they don't toe the legacy media line? You have to get down to clutchpoints.com (wtf is that?) before you get any specific context about the event and to the UK Mirror before you get any actual reporting. Outsports is the first one that identifies the culprits as "Mexico fans". It's hilarious. They aren't even trying. If the cause of an event can't be attributed to one of the sanctioned sources of evil, they don't even bother doing any reporting. It's no wonder faith in the US legacy media continues to drop along with readership. They earned it.

"FIFA has previously fined the Mexican Football Federation for homophobic chants made by the country’s fans."

"FIFA fined Mexico 100,000 Swiss francs ($108,000) in January for anti-gay chants by fans at two games"

FIFA fined Mexico 100,000 Swiss francs ($108,000) in January for anti-gay chants by fans at two games.

<nothing>

FIFA fined Mexico 100,000 Swiss francs ($108,000) in January for anti-gay chants by fans at two games.

This is not the first incident involving anti-gay chants and the Mexico soccer team.
The Mexican Football Federation has tried- to no avail- to prevent these chants from occurring.
The federation was slapped with a $108,000 fine for chants occurring at the 2022 World Cup.

After play was stopped the first time, a message was displayed on the scoreboards calling for fans to stop the homophobic chants. The offensive slurs were heard once again, however, with USMNT goalkeeper Matt Turner the subject of the chants following a final goal kick and Barton eventually blew the full-time whistle early with the USA 3-0 up.
The Mexican Football Federation (FMF) has been issued fines before as a result of similar actions by supporters, including a sanction following a chant heard during the World Cup in 2022 in Qatar.
CONCACAF confirmed that the match officials acted upon protocol during the match and security staff had removed several fans due to their behaviour inside the stadium. The Confederation has now launched an investigation into the events in an attempt to establish further details.

Mexico fans are yet still again chanting an anti-gay slur at American soccer players on U.S. soil during the two teams’ CONCACAF match Thursday night.
If I watch TV news, I watch NewsNation now. Dan Abrams is great and even Chris Coumo who was a insufferable, intolerable POS on CNN is almost watchable on NewsNation. It's amazing when you get these people away from the partisan legacy mob, how different they are. Now that having been said, I'm not sure if NewsNation covered the ugly Mexico behavior. Part of it is that soccer doesn't really move the needle much in the US.
 
I believe this without reservation. I also understand why the legacy media still has people that believe in it. Thank you for your contribution.
I believe this without reservation. I also understand why the legacy media still has people that believe in it. Thank you for your contribution.
What is it that the media believes that you find so worthy of a long, well-constructed message such as that?

Just put it in plain words that a sixth-grader could understand.
 
I believe this without reservation. I also understand why the legacy media still has people that believe in it. Thank you for your contribution.
The legacy media is hopelessly partisan.

Countless examples.

During the T presidency they had daily bombshell stories...any rumor or innuendo was reported as fact.

Senators pushing the FBI to release documents supposedly showing massive bribes to B? Crickets. Interest in the laptop? Crickets.

They way they talk about the banning of books. They say the books are banned. They are not. What I find is more interesting is they dont bother reporting on the actual content or images in those books that kids have access to in the school libraries. If they actually showed the images or content...there wouldnt be any controversy. The majority of people would say yeah...that isnt age appropriate. Instead they report without context and so create controversy.

The list goes on and on.
 
If I watch TV news, I watch NewsNation now. Dan Abrams is great and even Chris Coumo who was a insufferable, intolerable POS on CNN is almost watchable on NewsNation. It's amazing when you get these people away from the partisan legacy mob, how different they are. Now that having been said, I'm not sure if NewsNation covered the ugly Mexico behavior. Part of it is that soccer doesn't really move the needle much in the US.
Yeah, I get it when smaller news outlets don't report it at all because they don't have the bandwidth and/or it's not their focus.
 
Our dance included you posting drivel that didn't mention Trump. Obama kept documents because he was going to start a library and changed his mind. JoeTato stole documents as a senator, took them across state lines, hid them in his garage and lost his mind.
So the National Archives clear outline of the rights to docs of Presidents & Ex-Presidents is drivel! They included a full explanation of the O docs. Given that T was President and is now an ex-President, it's all relevant to him. You know all this though, so all you have is whatabout ...
 
Back
Top