Define lethality and how an "assault rifle" is becoming even more lethal? You can google it right after you finish looking for the how ar's are 10x more lethal lie you came up with before.
remind me again of what an assault rifle is? I know religion isn't your thing so I won't take offense to your nanny nanny boobo attempt at an insult.
Your narrow approach to gun violence is telling. You don't care about all of the innocent children being massacred in the inner cities? Who cares about them right? You'd rather elevate your politics over policy, bravo sweetie. Let's highlight 3% of gun deaths but let's forget about brown and black babies that die at a higher rate. Oi vey, you are special ---leaflet reading and regurgitation is exhausting... Remind me again what position your rugrat played?
Define lethality and how an "assault rifle" is becoming even more lethal? You can google it right after you finish looking for the how ar's are 10x more lethal lie you came up with before.
Define lethality and how an "assault rifle" is becoming even more lethal? You can google it right after you finish looking for the how ar's are 10x more lethal lie you came up with before.
Define lethality and how an "assault rifle" is becoming even more lethal? You can google it right after you finish looking for the how ar's are 10x more lethal lie you came up with before.
Define lethality and how an "assault rifle" is becoming even more lethal? You can google it right after you finish looking for the how ar's are 10x more lethal lie you came up with before.
So you dont have an explanation and cant define it it? Got it. I know why theres no breakdown of lethality by firearm and its painfully obvious you dont but keeping trying. I'll give you a hint though, what would you rather have a, .223 to the head from 10 yards, a .300 subsonic to the head at 10 yards, or a .380 to the head at 10 yards? Figure that out and you've figured out why theres no way to measure. Guns are made to kill, period. Thats why the whole "assault weapon" makes zero sense, that's literally what every gun is made for. Rifles are just made to touch targets further out, but in the scenarios around these shootings, caliber doesnt matter. They're all potentially lethal and by far the biggest factor is shot placement, not caliber. In close quarters with no medical aide available, it doesnt matter what caliber you're hit with, it matters where and how many times. Is a glock 17 with a 33rd mag capable of that just as .223 ar with a 30 rd mag? Theres no difference. With nobody returning fire, is there a difference, absolutely not. Theres no need for quick reloads or high count mags. There is no "lethality" you dipshit because there are so many variables going into every single shot it's impossible to measure.Honestly, I think your “better” argument is to just go full Alex Jones and deny all of these shootings. Because the idea that handguns kill kindergartners just as effectively as assault rifles is pretty fucking stupid.
Also, I heard that most of these school killings have been carried about psychopaths who have been taught and trained to kill at one's command. It's clear what these losers have been trying to do. It's sick. They use orphans and kids from broken homes to carry out this evil.So you dont have an explanation and cant define it it? Got it. I know why theres no breakdown of lethality by firearm and its painfully obvious you dont but keeping trying. I'll give you a hint though, what would you rather have a, .223 to the head from 10 yards, a .300 subsonic to the head at 10 yards, or a .380 to the head at 10 yards? Figure that out and you've figured out why theres no way to measure. Guns are made to kill, period. Thats why the whole "assault weapon" makes zero sense, that's literally what every gun is made for. Rifles are just made to touch targets further out, but in the scenarios around these shootings, caliber doesnt matter. They're all potentially lethal and by far the biggest factor is shot placement, not caliber. In close quarters with no medical aide available, it doesnt matter what caliber you're hit with, it matters where and how many times. Is a glock 17 with a 33rd mag capable of that just as .223 ar with a 30 rd mag? Theres no difference. With nobody returning fire, is there a difference, absolutely not. Theres no need for quick reloads or high count mags. There is no "lethality" you dipshit because there are so many variables going into every single shot it's impossible to measure.
And stop with the whole military uses ar's bs...ar10's were used before the military adopted the platform, the military only adopted it because they were able to purchase the manufacturer, and are getting rid of the caliber that's so devastating, its banned from hunting whitetail deer in most states. Does the military use rifles, yes. They play at longer ranges than school shootings. They also use 1911's, PCC's, sub machine, remington 700, and shotguns, all readily available to the public. The Benelli m4 was made for the marine corps but dont hear a peep about that and I'd rather take a 5.56 to the leg than 12g buck or .338 lapua. Just stop, you're spewing lies based on emotion not facts and logic because you know zero about firearms.
So you dont have an explanation and cant define it it? Got it. I know why theres no breakdown of lethality by firearm and its painfully obvious you dont but keeping trying. I'll give you a hint though, what would you rather have a, .223 to the head from 10 yards, a .300 subsonic to the head at 10 yards, or a .380 to the head at 10 yards? Figure that out and you've figured out why theres no way to measure. Guns are made to kill, period. Thats why the whole "assault weapon" makes zero sense, that's literally what every gun is made for. Rifles are just made to touch targets further out, but in the scenarios around these shootings, caliber doesnt matter. They're all potentially lethal and by far the biggest factor is shot placement, not caliber. In close quarters with no medical aide available, it doesnt matter what caliber you're hit with, it matters where and how many times. Is a glock 17 with a 33rd mag capable of that just as .223 ar with a 30 rd mag? Theres no difference. With nobody returning fire, is there a difference, absolutely not. Theres no need for quick reloads or high count mags. There is no "lethality" you dipshit because there are so many variables going into every single shot it's impossible to measure.
And stop with the whole military uses ar's bs...ar10's were used before the military adopted the platform, the military only adopted it because they were able to purchase the manufacturer, and are getting rid of the caliber that's so devastating, its banned from hunting whitetail deer in most states. Does the military use rifles, yes. They play at longer ranges than school shootings. They also use 1911's, PCC's, sub machine, remington 700, and shotguns, all readily available to the public. The Benelli m4 was made for the marine corps but dont hear a peep about that and I'd rather take a 5.56 to the leg than 12g buck or .338 lapua. Just stop, you're spewing lies based on emotion not facts and logic because you know zero about firearms.
Also, I heard that most of these school killings have been carried about psychopaths who have been taught and trained to kill at one's command. It's clear what these losers have been trying to do. It's sick. They use orphans and kids from broken homes to carry out this evil.
I knew you would say this evil. You are a sick and deranged human being. @Dominic this avatar is being played by a very sick person who has threaten me and my dd on numerous occasions. This is now the 3rd time he talks about one of our daughters being raped in the girls bathroom. Dom, deal with this sick person, thank you!lurking in the bathroom to rape your daughter as we speak.
So you dont have an explanation and cant define it it? Got it. I know why theres no breakdown of lethality by firearm and its painfully obvious you dont but keeping trying. I'll give you a hint though, what would you rather have a, .223 to the head from 10 yards, a .300 subsonic to the head at 10 yards, or a .380 to the head at 10 yards? Figure that out and you've figured out why theres no way to measure. Guns are made to kill, period. Thats why the whole "assault weapon" makes zero sense, that's literally what every gun is made for. Rifles are just made to touch targets further out, but in the scenarios around these shootings, caliber doesnt matter. They're all potentially lethal and by far the biggest factor is shot placement, not caliber. In close quarters with no medical aide available, it doesnt matter what caliber you're hit with, it matters where and how many times. Is a glock 17 with a 33rd mag capable of that just as .223 ar with a 30 rd mag? Theres no difference. With nobody returning fire, is there a difference, absolutely not. Theres no need for quick reloads or high count mags. There is no "lethality" you dipshit because there are so many variables going into every single shot it's impossible to measure.
And stop with the whole military uses ar's bs...ar10's were used before the military adopted the platform, the military only adopted it because they were able to purchase the manufacturer, and are getting rid of the caliber that's so devastating, its banned from hunting whitetail deer in most states. Does the military use rifles, yes. They play at longer ranges than school shootings. They also use 1911's, PCC's, sub machine, remington 700, and shotguns, all readily available to the public. The Benelli m4 was made for the marine corps but dont hear a peep about that and I'd rather take a 5.56 to the leg than 12g buck or .338 lapua. Just stop, you're spewing lies based on emotion not facts and logic because you know zero about firearms.
I knew you would say this evil. You are a sick and deranged human being. @Dominic this avatar is being played by a very sick person who has threaten me and my dd on numerous occasions. This is now the 3rd time he talks about one of our daughters being raped in the girls bathroom. Dom, deal with this sick person, thank you!