kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
Yeah, the Dolt and the Deserter make quite the team. I suppose they are an honest representation of the modern day Democrats.
Today in Fascism
- Thread starter Hüsker Dü
- Start date
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
Wait, that Harris rally? Damn! Hahahaha! This reminds me of the “You’re so ugly that …” jokes. Such as, You’re so ugly your mom had to tie a bone around your neck to get the dog to play with you. For Harris, it’s, “You’re so unpopular that to get a crowd to come see you, we have to get someone popular and then have you show up.”
1) Megan Thee Stallion
2) These guys below.
Is there anything real about the Democratic Party anymore?
1) Megan Thee Stallion
2) These guys below.
Is there anything real about the Democratic Party anymore?
I guess we can't accuse you of playing dumb. You've already proven to all of us how much you are.
Hüsker Dü
DA
You may want to check your source there.Timely, thanks.
Cori Bush Melts Down on Stage After Primary Loss: 'AIPAC, I'm Coming To Tear Your Kingdom Down'
Less than two days after the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's headquarters was vandalized, Rep. Cori Bush (D., Mo.) promised to tear down the Jewish group—a remark that caps off a failed primary campaign that began with an accusation she was "fanning the flames of antisemitism."freebeacon.com
"AIPAC, I'm coming to tear your kingdom down."
This only 2 days after AIPAC's headquarters were vandalized with "F$%K Israel" hate graffiti.
If I were you, I'd find another liberal hill to die on.
And “I’m coming to tear your kingdom down” comes from an old spiritual song.
You are trying to link her with vandalism?
Here, this shows a more realistic view.
Cori Bush in concession speech: 'AIPAC, I'm coming to tear your kingdom down'
Bush's resentful concession speech toward AIPAC was fuelled by their nearly $9 million dollar donation to her rival's campaign.
www.jpost.com
And once again being critical of the Israeli government doesn’t equate to “anti-semitism”
Hüsker Dü
DA
Coastal elitist confused and incoherent
Fox News host Laura Ingrahamcommitted an unforced error regarding midwest geography on Wednesday night’s The Ingraham Angle, and one which may not go over well with prideful residents of Minnesota and Wisconsin. During a discussion that was critical of the “radical policies” of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Ingraham implied that Milwaukee was in the border state of Minnesota. Not only that, but she did so right after claiming to be well acquainted with Walz’s home state. “If you know Minnesota well, and I know it well—especially Milwaukee—it’s changed,” Ingraham told her guest, The Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway. “It has never recovered from 2020, and it’s not the same place.” Milwaukee was the site of last month’s Republican National Convention, from where Ingraham broadcasted her nightly show.
Fox News host Laura Ingrahamcommitted an unforced error regarding midwest geography on Wednesday night’s The Ingraham Angle, and one which may not go over well with prideful residents of Minnesota and Wisconsin. During a discussion that was critical of the “radical policies” of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Ingraham implied that Milwaukee was in the border state of Minnesota. Not only that, but she did so right after claiming to be well acquainted with Walz’s home state. “If you know Minnesota well, and I know it well—especially Milwaukee—it’s changed,” Ingraham told her guest, The Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway. “It has never recovered from 2020, and it’s not the same place.” Milwaukee was the site of last month’s Republican National Convention, from where Ingraham broadcasted her nightly show.
F150s are racist. We should eliminate them and, instead, replace them with a tampon dispenser in every Redneck's garage.
Hey, Puppet, what is that line of Subarus doing to the air quality in Cheeseland?
Yes, coward, she can be linked with vandalism. Remember when she told the BLM to never stop? Or do you think they were out refurbishing communities?You may want to check your source there.
And “I’m coming to tear your kingdom down” comes from an old spiritual song.
You are trying to link her with vandalism?
Here, this shows a more realistic view.
Cori Bush in concession speech: 'AIPAC, I'm coming to tear your kingdom down'
Bush's resentful concession speech toward AIPAC was fuelled by their nearly $9 million dollar donation to her rival's campaign.
And once again being critical of the Israeli government doesn’t equate to “anti-semitism”
Hüsker Dü
DA
Projecting will get everywhere with you likeminded trolls. So cute and clever you are, continue.
Heels Up Harris, on national news, told Lester Holt she'd been to the border. 5 seconds later, she admitted she hadn't.
I'd rather be confused and incoherent (like Biden) than a bold faced liar. Oh wait... JoeTato was both!
"continue". Isn't that what your other profile always says, Yoda?
Trump say's to follow your heart when it comes to abortion and how many weeks is too many. Harris/Walz will allow you to kill your child up to 9 months and maybe even after birth depending on the State. Coach Walz a swell fella. He even puts tampons in boy's bathroom so some of the boys can play girl.
Dr. Ben Carson and many other Docs have said some abortion centers are selling baby parts, tissues and organs in many States.
Dr. Ben Carson and many other Docs have said some abortion centers are selling baby parts, tissues and organs in many States.
PURE EVIL: Newly Released Undercover Video Exposes Planned Parenthood Employees Joking and Laughing While Allegedly Admitting to Selling Aborted Baby Organs and Dismembered Parts.
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
What has happened to "the left"? Such a sad fall from what they were to authoritarian, anti-democratic, anti-privacy, and anti-freedom. Victimhood and Power is a hell of a drug. They are a deranged version of what they used to be. Shellenberger with the diagnosis.
---
They Create Anarchy To Impose Tyranny
Elites including Tim Walz are attacking free speech and personal freedom while encouraging more illegal migration and allowing more crime
MICHAEL SHELLENBERGER
AUG 7
For hundreds of years, liberals have been fierce opponents of authoritarianism. It has traditionally been liberals, not conservatives, who fought against restrictions on free speech, defended the right to privacy from the government, and fought abuses of power by government agencies. In contrast, conservatives have placed a higher value on maintaining social order and upholding traditional moral hierarchies.
But increasingly, it’s been liberal politicians who have demanded authoritarian restrictions on free speech and personal freedom. In December 2022, Democratic Vice Presidential candidate and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz claimed, “There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech and especially around our democracy.” In fact, the First Amendment protects both. And in 2020, Walz also implemented a Covid snitch line and encouraged residents to report violations of pandemic restrictions.
It turns out he wasn’t alone. The Civil Rights Department of California Governor Gavin Newsom introduced last year a snitch line and urged citizens to report their fellow citizens for alleged hate speech. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has called for greater censorship of social media platforms, and British police have over the last few days arrested three people for what they posted online. And Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has demanded greater online censorship, froze bank accounts of protesting truckers, and is pushing legislation that could send a person to prison for life for speech.
Each of those men would defend such measures as required for public safety. They would argue that misinformation and hate speech online lead to real-world violence like the riots we have seen in Britain. COVID-19 transmission threatened public health. And something had to be done to peacefully end the trucker protest.
But none of those measures was required because there were other ways to deal with those problems. It is a gross simplification to attribute Britain’s recent riots to online misinformation and the best antidote to misinformation remains good information, not censorship. There was never any reason to think that people outside not wearing masks were a sufficient threat to public health to justify a snitch line reminiscent of Communist totalitarianism, violating both privacy and personal liberty. And, the government had other ways to end the trucker protest and indeed used them, making the bank freezing a gratuitous and authoritarian overreach.
What’s more, the authoritarian measures imposed by these leaders were highly selective in nature. None of the four politicians named demanded censorship of the misinformation and hate speech that spread after the killing of George Floyd, which one could argue contributed to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots as much if not more than the ones over the last week in Britain. Nor have the politicians called for censorship to halt the sharp increase of illegal migration. And all of the politicians have adopted a different standard of policing of protests by BLM and other left-wing causes than for anti-immigration, Freedom Convoy truckers, and right-wing ones, which some have called “two-tier” policing.
In the case of gender, liberal politicians have pursued anarchy for medical professionals and tyranny for anyone who stands in the way of so-called “gender-affirming care.” On the one hand, liberal politicians like Walz and Newsom have championed the right of medical professionals to block puberty, prescribe cross-sex hormones, and perform surgeries. On the other, they have increasingly taken over from parents the right to decide what happens to their children.
As such, liberal politicians like Walz, Newsom, Trudeau, and Starmer are simultaneously creating greater authoritarianism and greater anarchy. This is in stark contrast to liberals in the past who fought authoritarianism and demanded greater free speech, personal freedom, and privacy. What exactly happened? How did liberals become advocates of anarcho-tyranny?
<cont>
---
They Create Anarchy To Impose Tyranny
Elites including Tim Walz are attacking free speech and personal freedom while encouraging more illegal migration and allowing more crime
MICHAEL SHELLENBERGER
AUG 7
For hundreds of years, liberals have been fierce opponents of authoritarianism. It has traditionally been liberals, not conservatives, who fought against restrictions on free speech, defended the right to privacy from the government, and fought abuses of power by government agencies. In contrast, conservatives have placed a higher value on maintaining social order and upholding traditional moral hierarchies.
But increasingly, it’s been liberal politicians who have demanded authoritarian restrictions on free speech and personal freedom. In December 2022, Democratic Vice Presidential candidate and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz claimed, “There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech and especially around our democracy.” In fact, the First Amendment protects both. And in 2020, Walz also implemented a Covid snitch line and encouraged residents to report violations of pandemic restrictions.
It turns out he wasn’t alone. The Civil Rights Department of California Governor Gavin Newsom introduced last year a snitch line and urged citizens to report their fellow citizens for alleged hate speech. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has called for greater censorship of social media platforms, and British police have over the last few days arrested three people for what they posted online. And Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has demanded greater online censorship, froze bank accounts of protesting truckers, and is pushing legislation that could send a person to prison for life for speech.
Each of those men would defend such measures as required for public safety. They would argue that misinformation and hate speech online lead to real-world violence like the riots we have seen in Britain. COVID-19 transmission threatened public health. And something had to be done to peacefully end the trucker protest.
But none of those measures was required because there were other ways to deal with those problems. It is a gross simplification to attribute Britain’s recent riots to online misinformation and the best antidote to misinformation remains good information, not censorship. There was never any reason to think that people outside not wearing masks were a sufficient threat to public health to justify a snitch line reminiscent of Communist totalitarianism, violating both privacy and personal liberty. And, the government had other ways to end the trucker protest and indeed used them, making the bank freezing a gratuitous and authoritarian overreach.
What’s more, the authoritarian measures imposed by these leaders were highly selective in nature. None of the four politicians named demanded censorship of the misinformation and hate speech that spread after the killing of George Floyd, which one could argue contributed to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots as much if not more than the ones over the last week in Britain. Nor have the politicians called for censorship to halt the sharp increase of illegal migration. And all of the politicians have adopted a different standard of policing of protests by BLM and other left-wing causes than for anti-immigration, Freedom Convoy truckers, and right-wing ones, which some have called “two-tier” policing.
In the case of gender, liberal politicians have pursued anarchy for medical professionals and tyranny for anyone who stands in the way of so-called “gender-affirming care.” On the one hand, liberal politicians like Walz and Newsom have championed the right of medical professionals to block puberty, prescribe cross-sex hormones, and perform surgeries. On the other, they have increasingly taken over from parents the right to decide what happens to their children.
As such, liberal politicians like Walz, Newsom, Trudeau, and Starmer are simultaneously creating greater authoritarianism and greater anarchy. This is in stark contrast to liberals in the past who fought authoritarianism and demanded greater free speech, personal freedom, and privacy. What exactly happened? How did liberals become advocates of anarcho-tyranny?
<cont>