Sheriff Joe
DA
Easy target.. . . and that's all that matters to you.
Easy target.. . . and that's all that matters to you.
Hard to tell with you people, you even call me racist so forgive me if I ask you for a bit of evidence.You love you some racists, don't you? LePage is a major league POS.
Any news on this?
Funny, I didn’t hear Iz confirm that he’s accepting the bet, limited to whether or not accountants will firmly and unequivocally answer “no” to the question of whether something has to be income-producing to be considered an “asset.” Of course they will. Of course he’s afraid to bet.Ok. You said: We are on for this bet:
I will bet you 100 cases of Sculpin or your favorite Trappist brew that if we email any major American business accounting firm and ask if assets must produce "cash flow" to be considered an asset they will firmly and unequivocally say "no." We on? Or are you the coward?
Awesome. I'll email a few accountants first thing Monday. I'm working up a major league thirst! Mmmmmmm..... (and yeah, the flavored Sculpin sucks. It's like a wine spritzer. But the IPA is a nice local summer brew. I like Telegraph Road better, but you can't get 100 cases easily. I'm fine to take a nice Belgian as well. I'm pretty much Homer Simpson on this one: Mmmm. Beer! As long as it's not mass-produced gold water.)
Ok. You said: We are on for this bet:
I will bet you 100 cases of Sculpin or your favorite Trappist brew that if we email any major American business accounting firm and ask if assets must produce "cash flow" to be considered an asset they will firmly and unequivocally say "no." We on? Or are you the coward?
Awesome. I'll email a few accountants first thing Monday. I'm working up a major league thirst! Mmmmmmm..... (and yeah, the flavored Sculpin sucks. It's like a wine spritzer. But the IPA is a nice local summer brew. I like Telegraph Road better, but you can't get 100 cases easily. I'm fine to take a nice Belgian as well. I'm pretty much Homer Simpson on this one: Mmmm. Beer! As long as it's not mass-produced gold water.)
It’s actually really clear that Fries U is not teaching their students about how to read the financials. The function of assets is to cash flow whether now or in the future. Using equity to provide cash flow shouldn’t be new to a veteran like yourself, Frienance.You just read that in the Daddy book? It's now really clear you simply don't understand what you're talking about.
Which is not surprising.
"Cash flow" is "not" the function of all assets. That's absurd. Many assets "function" is to provide future value, not current cash flow.
Dim. I guess you still think the rand in the safe deposit box is flowing some cash...
Fake News.Any news on this?
Did the MAGA hat wearing thugs get caught and put to the guillotine yet?
https://twitter.com/RandyRRQuaid/status/1091793707777642497
I dare anyone to try and watch this withhout laughing out loud.
Any news on this?
Did the MAGA hat wearing thugs get caught and put to the guillotine yet?
https://twitter.com/RandyRRQuaid/status/1091793707777642497
I dare anyone to try and watch this withhout laughing out loud.
"Dare"? Still missing your days in junior high?
Yes you are.Easy target.
You try so hard.Here is what you said:
It’s actually really clear that Fries U is not teaching their students about how to read the financials. The function of assets is to cash flow whether now or in the future. Using equity to provide cash flow shouldn’t be new to a veteran like yourself, Frienance.
Asset Future value or equity can change. Hence the tech wreck and the housing crisis. Assets can also negative cash flow or you can use the equity in assets to provide a return on the equity of that asset. Just like Your AAPL bonds question. But go ahead and call your imaginary accounting firm.
You Missing your junior high days?Yes you are.
Here is what you said:
It’s actually really clear that Fries U is not teaching their students about how to read the financials. The function of assets is to cash flow whether now or in the future. Using equity to provide cash flow shouldn’t be new to a veteran like yourself, Frienance.
Asset Future value or equity can change. Hence the tech wreck and the housing crisis. Assets can also negative cash flow or you can use the equity in assets to provide a return on the equity of that asset. Just like Your AAPL bonds question. But go ahead and call your imaginary accounting firm.
"In the future..." Kek. NOW you come round when the rubber is about to hit the road.
You're a liar and con. But you're amusing.
Now, care to explain how my gold bars provide "income" without me selling them or borrowing against them? Oh yes, now you'll add "future" to the equation...
I know why you defend Trump - you're a dishonest con too. Kek.
I can’t dumb down for you. Fries U grads are smarter than you.You try so hard.