The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
Hüsker Dü
DA
He has company now.
Sheriff Joe
DA
I am just repeating what the head of the judiciary and the top attorney in the he world said yesterday.
Ha
Sheriff Joe
DA
Where?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Wake up, it's morning.
Hüsker Dü
DA
He's dreaming . . . of keeping his boss happy.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Au contraire . . . both on the way out. Merely asterisks in the sands of time.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Leading up to 2020?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Good thing this douche didn't make it.
Jeb Bush: ‘Not Sure’ Sanctuary Cities for Illegals Are a ‘Problem’ in Florida
Andrew Harnik/AP Photo
JOHN BINDER 2 May 2019
Former Florida governor and failed presidential candidate Jeb Bush (R) is questioning why Florida’s current governor, Ron DeSantis (R), is pushing to ban sanctuary cities that protect criminal illegal aliens in the state.
As Breitbart News has chronicled, DeSantis has led an initiative in Florida to ban sanctuary city jurisdictions across the state. The plan, which has already passed the state Senate, would fine a locality or county $5,000 every day that it enforces a sanctuary policy.
Bush used the same rhetoric that elected Democrats have used against the sanctuary city ban, claiming DeSantis is only trying to score political points and that jurisdictions shielding illegal aliens from deportation are not a problem in Florida.
Bush said, according to Politico:
This is one of those new political issues where it’s designed to make a point rather than to solve a problem. I’m not sure we have this problem. But it could be in the last few years something has changed. [Emphasis added]
Democrat Andrew Gillum, whom DeSantis beat out in last year’s gubernatorial election, has made similar claims to that of Bush’s statement that sanctuary cities do not exist in Florida.
The left-leaning fact-checking site PolitiFact debunked Gillum’s claim that there were no sanctuary cities in the state, writing, “Whether Florida has sanctuary cities is not as settled as Gillum claimed.”
Currently, Alachua County, Florida, refuses to turn illegal aliens over to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), even after a national is accused of a crime. Likewise, West Palm Beach County, Florida, bans local officials from aiding ICE with investigations into criminal illegal aliens.
The Bush family has long campaigned for and supported a globalist illegal and legal immigration policy for the U.S. Aside from supporting amnesty, both Jeb Bush and his brother, former President George W. Bush, oppose cutting legal immigration levels to boost Americans’ wages and reduce foreign competition against working-class Americans.
Former President George H.W. Bush infamously signed into law the Immigration Act of 1990, which created the series of employment-based visas allowing businesses and corporations to readily import cheaper foreign workers rather than hire American citizens. Bush’s immigration law also increased legal immigration flows from Central America, South America, and Mexico to the U.S.
Jeb Bush: ‘Not Sure’ Sanctuary Cities for Illegals Are a ‘Problem’ in Florida
Andrew Harnik/AP Photo
JOHN BINDER 2 May 2019
Former Florida governor and failed presidential candidate Jeb Bush (R) is questioning why Florida’s current governor, Ron DeSantis (R), is pushing to ban sanctuary cities that protect criminal illegal aliens in the state.
As Breitbart News has chronicled, DeSantis has led an initiative in Florida to ban sanctuary city jurisdictions across the state. The plan, which has already passed the state Senate, would fine a locality or county $5,000 every day that it enforces a sanctuary policy.
Bush used the same rhetoric that elected Democrats have used against the sanctuary city ban, claiming DeSantis is only trying to score political points and that jurisdictions shielding illegal aliens from deportation are not a problem in Florida.
Bush said, according to Politico:
This is one of those new political issues where it’s designed to make a point rather than to solve a problem. I’m not sure we have this problem. But it could be in the last few years something has changed. [Emphasis added]
Democrat Andrew Gillum, whom DeSantis beat out in last year’s gubernatorial election, has made similar claims to that of Bush’s statement that sanctuary cities do not exist in Florida.
The left-leaning fact-checking site PolitiFact debunked Gillum’s claim that there were no sanctuary cities in the state, writing, “Whether Florida has sanctuary cities is not as settled as Gillum claimed.”
Currently, Alachua County, Florida, refuses to turn illegal aliens over to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), even after a national is accused of a crime. Likewise, West Palm Beach County, Florida, bans local officials from aiding ICE with investigations into criminal illegal aliens.
The Bush family has long campaigned for and supported a globalist illegal and legal immigration policy for the U.S. Aside from supporting amnesty, both Jeb Bush and his brother, former President George W. Bush, oppose cutting legal immigration levels to boost Americans’ wages and reduce foreign competition against working-class Americans.
Former President George H.W. Bush infamously signed into law the Immigration Act of 1990, which created the series of employment-based visas allowing businesses and corporations to readily import cheaper foreign workers rather than hire American citizens. Bush’s immigration law also increased legal immigration flows from Central America, South America, and Mexico to the U.S.
Hüsker Dü
DA
They need to make it through 2019 first.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Because your only understanding (if you possess one) has been hand made for you by those that wish to divide (of which you are a willing participant), you lack the fundamental capacity to decipher the situation.*Good thing this douche didn't make it.
Jeb Bush: ‘Not Sure’ Sanctuary Cities for Illegals Are a ‘Problem’ in Florida
Andrew Harnik/AP Photo
JOHN BINDER 2 May 2019
Former Florida governor and failed presidential candidate Jeb Bush (R) is questioning why Florida’s current governor, Ron DeSantis (R), is pushing to ban sanctuary cities that protect criminal illegal aliens in the state.
As Breitbart News has chronicled, DeSantis has led an initiative in Florida to ban sanctuary city jurisdictions across the state. The plan, which has already passed the state Senate, would fine a locality or county $5,000 every day that it enforces a sanctuary policy.
Bush used the same rhetoric that elected Democrats have used against the sanctuary city ban, claiming DeSantis is only trying to score political points and that jurisdictions shielding illegal aliens from deportation are not a problem in Florida.
Bush said, according to Politico:
This is one of those new political issues where it’s designed to make a point rather than to solve a problem. I’m not sure we have this problem. But it could be in the last few years something has changed. [Emphasis added]
Democrat Andrew Gillum, whom DeSantis beat out in last year’s gubernatorial election, has made similar claims to that of Bush’s statement that sanctuary cities do not exist in Florida.
The left-leaning fact-checking site PolitiFact debunked Gillum’s claim that there were no sanctuary cities in the state, writing, “Whether Florida has sanctuary cities is not as settled as Gillum claimed.”
Currently, Alachua County, Florida, refuses to turn illegal aliens over to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), even after a national is accused of a crime. Likewise, West Palm Beach County, Florida, bans local officials from aiding ICE with investigations into criminal illegal aliens.
The Bush family has long campaigned for and supported a globalist illegal and legal immigration policy for the U.S. Aside from supporting amnesty, both Jeb Bush and his brother, former President George W. Bush, oppose cutting legal immigration levels to boost Americans’ wages and reduce foreign competition against working-class Americans.
Former President George H.W. Bush infamously signed into law the Immigration Act of 1990, which created the series of employment-based visas allowing businesses and corporations to readily import cheaper foreign workers rather than hire American citizens. Bush’s immigration law also increased legal immigration flows from Central America, South America, and Mexico to the U.S.
* The above statement can be applied to almost all of joe's posts and that of his comrades in stupidity.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Yeah, the Senate will impeach both of them at the same time.
Hüsker Dü
DA
The evidence mounts daily.
Sheriff Joe
DA
I bet you wish your husband did that to you daily.
Sheriff Joe
DA
ext: President Trump Reaches a Milestone: Confirming Judge 100 to the Federal Bench
Brutal: WSJ, National Review Editorials Slam Democrats' Phony Fuming at Attorney General Barr
Guy Benson | @guypbenson | May 02, 2019
As everyone knows, Bill Barr released a brief letter summarizing the top-line conclusions of the Mueller report shortly after he received it. Justice Department lawyers then worked with Mueller staff to make the appropriate redactions, after which the entire 400-page report was publicly released. Strangely enough, this process has become an obsession for Democrats and the press and the focus of endless conspiracy theories...Barr’s position was eminently reasonable. He wanted to get the basic verdict of the Mueller report out as quickly as possible, given the inherent interest in the question of whether the president of the United States had conspired with the Russians. He opposed the subsequent release of the summaries of the report, as suggested in Mueller’s letter, because he thought it better that the public get the entire report at once. Which it did. Democrats and the media are acting as if Barr engaged in some sort of cover-up, when he went further than required under the regulations to release all of the report with minimal redactions. Even Mueller in a phone conversation with Barr didn’t complain that his summary of findings was inaccurate — Barr was careful to note that Mueller didn’t “exonerate” Trump on obstruction.
The piece also dismantles a "perjury" allegation against Barr, and scolds Mueller's team over their pointless letter complaining about the atmospherics surrounding Barr's entirely accurate four-page memo: "Particularly troubling [to them] was that it wasn’t damning enough of the president. This is not a prosecutorial concern, but a political one unworthy of people who were invested with incredible investigative power in the name of objectivity." The editorial concludes, "Barr’s critics are demonstrating their lack of judgment and seriousness, not his." Also worthwhile is David French's analysis, considering the harsh opprobrium he heaped upon President Trump following the release of Mueller's work (my take was here). French rightly backs Barr's actions and upbraids his unhinged critics, noting that any frustrations about the Barr summary (the approach to which French calls "entirely fair") were rendered moot as soon as the largely-unredacted, context-rich underlying document was made public. In case you missed it yesterday, Sen. Ted Cruz highlighted this overwhelmingly important point during Wednesday's hearing, ridiculing his Democratic colleagues' "exceptionally weak argument," drawing a chuckle from Barr (scroll ahead to the two-minute mark):
As you've no doubt seen by now, the Attorney General declined to show up for a scheduled House hearing today, as a dispute over who would be allowed to conduct the questioning derailed the process. Democrats wanted hand-picked staff members to be designated to ask the questions, while Republicans countered that lawmakers have never ceded such a role to subordinates in the entire history of the committee. This is quite a stemwinder from the ranking member, and it doesn't make Chairman Jerry Nadler look good:
Brutal: WSJ, National Review Editorials Slam Democrats' Phony Fuming at Attorney General Barr
Guy Benson | @guypbenson | May 02, 2019
As everyone knows, Bill Barr released a brief letter summarizing the top-line conclusions of the Mueller report shortly after he received it. Justice Department lawyers then worked with Mueller staff to make the appropriate redactions, after which the entire 400-page report was publicly released. Strangely enough, this process has become an obsession for Democrats and the press and the focus of endless conspiracy theories...Barr’s position was eminently reasonable. He wanted to get the basic verdict of the Mueller report out as quickly as possible, given the inherent interest in the question of whether the president of the United States had conspired with the Russians. He opposed the subsequent release of the summaries of the report, as suggested in Mueller’s letter, because he thought it better that the public get the entire report at once. Which it did. Democrats and the media are acting as if Barr engaged in some sort of cover-up, when he went further than required under the regulations to release all of the report with minimal redactions. Even Mueller in a phone conversation with Barr didn’t complain that his summary of findings was inaccurate — Barr was careful to note that Mueller didn’t “exonerate” Trump on obstruction.
The piece also dismantles a "perjury" allegation against Barr, and scolds Mueller's team over their pointless letter complaining about the atmospherics surrounding Barr's entirely accurate four-page memo: "Particularly troubling [to them] was that it wasn’t damning enough of the president. This is not a prosecutorial concern, but a political one unworthy of people who were invested with incredible investigative power in the name of objectivity." The editorial concludes, "Barr’s critics are demonstrating their lack of judgment and seriousness, not his." Also worthwhile is David French's analysis, considering the harsh opprobrium he heaped upon President Trump following the release of Mueller's work (my take was here). French rightly backs Barr's actions and upbraids his unhinged critics, noting that any frustrations about the Barr summary (the approach to which French calls "entirely fair") were rendered moot as soon as the largely-unredacted, context-rich underlying document was made public. In case you missed it yesterday, Sen. Ted Cruz highlighted this overwhelmingly important point during Wednesday's hearing, ridiculing his Democratic colleagues' "exceptionally weak argument," drawing a chuckle from Barr (scroll ahead to the two-minute mark):
As you've no doubt seen by now, the Attorney General declined to show up for a scheduled House hearing today, as a dispute over who would be allowed to conduct the questioning derailed the process. Democrats wanted hand-picked staff members to be designated to ask the questions, while Republicans countered that lawmakers have never ceded such a role to subordinates in the entire history of the committee. This is quite a stemwinder from the ranking member, and it doesn't make Chairman Jerry Nadler look good:
Sheriff Joe
DA
What the fuck is wrong with you people?
WATCH: Creepy Chris Matthews Bizarrely Compares Trump Invoking Executive Privilege to Losing Your Virginity
https://www.redstate.com/sister-tol...nvoking-executive-privilege-losing-virginity/
WATCH: Creepy Chris Matthews Bizarrely Compares Trump Invoking Executive Privilege to Losing Your Virginity
https://www.redstate.com/sister-tol...nvoking-executive-privilege-losing-virginity/
Hüsker Dü
DA
Once you give it up it's gone . . . t just wants everything tied up in litigation like he did in business. Difference is, here the government won't settle or run out of funds.
Sheriff Joe
DA
30 million wasn't enough huh?
If we're in the 3rd quarter, its 56 t0 10 and your quarterback and running back are out of the game with puffy red eyes.