It's apart of his/their all or nothing thinking. The, "There is no such thing as a truly free market" thing has been argued in here for years and they still don't get it. As with the we all pitch in together to pay for common needs, socialism.Not even remotely close to a free market. Do you know the terms "investment subsidies," "agriculture subsidies," "energy subsidies," campaign contributions (as has been previously mentioned), capital gains benefits, etc., none of which occur in a free market economy. It's your fantasy.
So like the lying media claim on the other page, you call people lies just for fun? When they're not lying? Snowflake little punk. "Waahhh, the media's lying and so are you, Xav!"
We cann't compete with China or Vietnam paying labor $1 a day and that's where the jobs are going. And I get offers to sell my business, which would pay me the equivalent of about 4 years of what I make, plus a fat salary, but of course conditioned on firing most of my people so they don't duplicate existing infrastructure. You're living a fantasy. That makes you a sucker like Joe.
Work is good, has been for a few years now. Even an old fart like me is profiting from the wage war.
Someone is offering to pay you millions for a sucessful business and get rid of your existing employee base?
You are a dope.
You once again mis read my statement. You and yours lack of excepting the fact that are system is a capitalism with the good parts of socialism mixed in is the all or nothing part.
Because you speak of extreme capitalism vs. decrepit socialism, without recognizing any middle ground, such as those economies and their health care systems.
Sure they would. If you own a business, you sell it on a multiple of gross or net. Some portion of what you received represents a multiple of what the owner personally makes every year, doesn't it? Again, you people can have your incredibly ill-founded views about politics, but why do you insist on calling me a liar?Your response is the fantasy, no one would sell their " Successful " business for those terms......
Hate to have facts interfere here, but didn't the last Dem administration commence during a huge recession, which came from a GOP administration that had inherited a buget surplus from its Dem predecessor? You remember, don't you? 9/11? A recession? Thank God the Democratic came in. Now we will see how the economy and our safety do under a new GOP administration.Save your " Nuts " just in case the Democrats try to crash the economy thru extreme measures......
Sure they would. If you own a business, you sell it on a multiple of gross or net. Some portion of what you received represents a multiple of what the owner personally makes every year, doesn't it? Again, you people can have your incredibly ill-founded views about politics, but why do you insist on calling me a liar?
You don't understand those concepts, do you, Nono? Gross revenue? Net profit? No? I figured." Multiple of Gross or Net......... "
I'm going to let you boil in that sad sauce for awhile.....
Can't dispute the message attack the messenger.Spelling, semantics and structure......whew, liquor must be flowing early.
Here are some facts for you, Clinton didn't leave with a surplus and give me ten trillion and this country would be much better off than when the Kenyan left.Hate to have facts interfere here, but didn't the last Dem administration commence during a huge recession, which came from a GOP administration that had inherited a buget surplus from its Dem predecessor? You remember, don't you? 9/11? A recession? Thank God the Democratic came in. Now we will see how the economy and our safety do under a new GOP administration.
Hate to have facts interfere here, but didn't the last Dem administration commence during a huge recession, which came from a GOP administration that had inherited a buget surplus from its Dem predecessor? You remember, don't you? 9/11? A recession? Thank God the Democratic came in. Now we will see how the economy and our safety do under a new GOP administration.