Bruddah IZ
DA
Espola's memory and neighborhood was deleted with the last forum.Look it up...you'll learn and remember it much better than if someone does the work for you.
ps... why do you think he's living in the Ecuadorian Embassy?
Espola's memory and neighborhood was deleted with the last forum.Look it up...you'll learn and remember it much better than if someone does the work for you.
ps... why do you think he's living in the Ecuadorian Embassy?
I don't expect Comey or the Dept of Justice to change their collective minds.If Comey is not applying the law now. It is unlikely that another 14,000 e-mails will change his mind. In fact, they may choose to find nothing in the 14,000 e-mails.
violating 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which states:
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed . . . Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(emphasis added)
In criminal law, unless strict liability applies, a statute can require four distinct mental states (“mens rea”) to commit a crime: (i) purpose, (ii) knowledge, (iii) recklessness, and (iv) criminal/gross negligence.
Did those Prosecutors have all the details like Comey did? Are you suggesting Comey lied or was derelict in his duties as Director of the FBI?There are other very experience US prosecutors who said Comey is wrong in determining what a prosecutor might or might not do, that he should have presented the evidence to prosecutors & let them determine if they would prosecute. These same former prosecutors would have prosecuted Mrs. Clinton, that the fact that a private server was set up, along with the lies she told regarding deleting only private emails, claiming that no work related emails had been deleted & that her lawyers had review all emails that had been deleted, shows a pattern of deception, proving intent.
Since Comey presented his opinion another 14000 work related emails that HRC claimed had been turned over were found and released.
I'm looking forward to one criminal -Assange & wikileaks - releasing what he has on another criminal - Hillary.
Adult conversations are for adults. Run along now.Gee - I gave you another chance to participate in an adult conversation and you just go all Izzy.
This suggests that you believe Comey is lying as I asked you earlier.If Comey is not applying the law now. It is unlikely that another 14,000 e-mails will change his mind. In fact, they may choose to find nothing in the 14,000 e-mails.
.
Which ones, the Top Secret or the Secret e-mails?Do you think the emails released are work related?
Why would Comey take the "easy way out"?I don't expect Comey or the Dept of Justice to change their collective minds.
But the American public could be swayed. Obviously HRC has those that will support her and believe that she actually came under sniper fire and that she was dead broke when she left the white house, that a vast right wing conspiracy sent Monica to sexually assault WJC...
Comey took the easy way out...he made a great argument for prosecution then concluded he had no case...
Fact is she lied to congress under oath..
Again, the video made it clear that there is only one liar, Hillary. Comey's speech was probably the strongest indirect calling of Hillary a liar yet.This suggests that you believe Comey is lying as I asked you earlier.
Are you trying to be cute or not just getting your facts straight. The emails Comey was discussing as part of those chains they deemed classified were not part of "found emails" but the original emails turned over to the State Department and were not part of the "found" emails.Which ones, the Top Secret or the Secret e-mails?
I never watched his show, but the Dukes, I loved.I think you are mistaking me for the Trump supporter David.
Did Comey say her actions were criminal?Again, the video made it clear that there is only one liar, Hillary. Comey's speech was probably the strongest indirect calling Hillary a liar yet.
Apparently, details don't matter. Especially these details:Did those Prosecutors have all the details like Comey did?
Gee I'm so thrilled that you included me in one of your "lucid" moments E.Gee - I gave you another chance to participate in an adult conversation and you just go all Izzy.
The law says her actions were criminal and Comey laid out a great case for the following law which he is not above......maybe:Did Comey say her actions were criminal?
I love that jingle...."Visiting angels, America's favorite home care"...Gee I'm so thrilled that you included me in one of your "lucid" moments E.
But my response is still look it up yourself, or have your Visiting Angel look it up and read it to you....
Are you trying to be cute or not just getting your facts straight.Are you trying to be cute or not just getting your facts straight. The emails Comey was discussing as part of those chains they deemed classified were not part of "found emails" but the original emails turned over to the State Department and were not part of the "found" emails.
CuteAre you trying to be cute or not just getting your facts straight. The emails Comey was discussing as part of those chains they deemed classified were not part of "found emails" but the original emails turned over to the State Department and were not part of the "found" emails.
What is Assange's crime?
Why would Comey take the "easy way out"?
I am not being cute. Too ugly and old for that. I remember Comey specifically stating knowledge and purpose as two things her actions did not meet the criteria. She unlike Patreaus also did not lie to the FBI about her actions. That was Comey's agents position.Are you trying to be cute or not just getting your facts straight.
violating 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which states:
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed . . . Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(emphasis added)
In criminal law, unless strict liability applies, a statute can require four distinct mental states (“mens rea”) to commit a crime: (i) purpose, (ii) knowledge, (iii) recklessness, and (iv) criminal/gross negligence.