Ponderable

The majority of Americans who vote for President will make one of three choices in November.

1. Vote for someone irrelevant.
2. Vote for someone who makes you throw up just a little bit in your mouth while doing it.
3. Vote for someone that simultaneously makes you a bit terrified and very angry.

jmo 2/3
 
Andy Dukes said:
The majority of Americans who vote for President will make one of three choices in November.

1. Vote for someone irrelevant.
2. Vote for someone who makes you throw up just a little bit in your mouth while doing it.
3. Vote for someone that simultaneously makes you a bit terrified and very angry.

jmo 2/3
Click to expand...

There is no irrelevant vote.
 
oh yeah, "truth be damned"!!

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government — or even with a commercial service like Gmail.
 
Truth? Who needs the damn truth?!! Not Comey or Lynch

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.
 
Andy Dukes said:
Kitty Whiskers,

It is not a conspiracy it is a dance. On one side is the habitual line steppers, the Clintons. On the other is the right that is terrified by them because the Clintons constantly eat their lunch. No conspiracy. Just the same dance for 40 years.
2/3
Click to expand...
Habitual line steppers...that's way to kind.
Unindicted felons is closer to the truth.
The right is more frustrated than terrified.
Folks agree that Hillary Clinton is a liar, a manipulator & untrustworthy, yet they're still gonna vote for her....
We get the government we deserve....we are pathetic.
 
Lion Eyes said:
Habitual line steppers...that's way to kind.
Unindicted felons is closer to the truth.
The right is more frustrated than terrified.
Folks agree that Hillary Clinton is a liar, a manipulator & untrustworthy, yet they're still gonna vote for her....
We get the government we deserve....we are pathetic.
Click to expand...
I trust her much more than the other parties candidate. I seem to be inline with many people.

2/3
 
Last edited:
Andy Dukes said:
I trust her much more than the other parties candidate. I seem to be inline with many people.

2/3
Click to expand...
Wouldn't be the first time that people aligned themselves with a liar......from the same house, with the same last name, working for the same foundation. Should I go on?
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Please show me where I thought Comey is a liar.
Click to expand...
You stated he made a criminal case but of course he said exactly the opposite thing, so I made a leap of logic. If you don't consider him a liar he must at least not be considered by you "reasonable folk" based on your post.

2/3
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Reasonable folks know that Comey laid out a case for Criminal charges.
Click to expand...
Reasonable being the key word.
Like minded people see no wrong in the history of lies this woman has told...
From her being named for Sir Edmund Hillary, to coming under fire when she landed in Bosnia to being dead broke when she left the White House. It goes on and on. She set up a sever so she could hide the truth about her corruption. Like minded people agree with her lying about Benghazi "what difference does it make"?
 
Andy Dukes said:
You stated he made a criminal case but of course he said exactly the opposite thing, so I made a leap of logic. If you don't consider him a liar he must at least not be considered by you "reasonable folk" based on your post.
2/3
Click to expand...
"There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation" Comey

Obviously you believe this woman reasonable....
Speaks volumes.
 
Lion Eyes said:
"There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation" Comey

Obviously you believe this woman reasonable....
Speaks volumes.
Click to expand...

Reasonable is not the word I would use.

2/3
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top