Ponderable

You said they pay full time.
You must know.

If there's money, let me in on it.
xavi let us in on his business secrets.
You'll need to move to DC, wear a suit and tie to blend in and be willing to spend long hours trying to figure out how to get usually intelligent people to go against their own best interests. You will need some background in psychology.
 
You'll need to move to DC, wear a suit and tie to blend in and be willing to spend long hours trying to figure out how to get usually intelligent people to go against their own best interests. You will need some background in psychology.
Why do I need to move to DC?
Everything is on the interwebs.

I can do it in my underwear, like xavi, from his mom's basement.
We can tell stories of how intelligent we are, and how we "drunk with Breitbart and Bannon"
 
You'll need to move to DC, wear a suit and tie to blend in and be willing to spend long hours trying to figure out how to get usually intelligent people to go against their own best interests. You will need some background in psychology.

Bilbray comes to mind.
 
I have to point out what a masterful job the people pulling strings on the right are doing. In an era of unprecedented massive wealth and real estate and stock prices minting millionaires and billionaires daily, the finger is pointing at the working man (and woman) demanding higher wages. Classic!

Let me help you with your argument:

 
Im stupid, remember?
Us kind dont live in think tanks. We live in a place called the real world, and vote for Trump.
Yet you are swayed, heavily in some cases (see: nono, lil 'joe), by the influence of think tanks, Aren't you at all interested where and why they promote what they do? . . . and no, they aren't hiring or advertising, they want you to feel they have no influence on what you think.
 
We cann't compete with China or Vietnam paying labor $1 a day and that's where the jobs are going. And I get offers to sell my business, which would pay me the equivalent of about 4 years of what I make, plus a fat salary, but of course conditioned on firing most of my people so they don't duplicate existing infrastructure. You're living a fantasy. That makes you a sucker like Joe.
We really don't want to compete with China or Vietnam in the labor market. They make goods cheaper for American's to purchase with the unintended effect of making your wages go further for most items in the CPI's basket of goods. It's called liberal and mutually beneficial trade I might add. See the post on Denmark's liberal trade policy. What is your simulated company worth? Lets ask "Carmen". Lol
 
I have to point out what a masterful job the people pulling strings on the right are doing. In an era of unprecedented massive wealth and real estate and stock prices minting millionaires and billionaires daily, the finger is pointing at the working man (and woman) demanding higher wages. Classic!
Your babble reminds me of Du run run ons.
 
Keep saying it until you believe it, Joe. But I know that you know I'm telling the truth and you're confused by it. I have other Republican friends who I confuse, as well...but they're rich so they know what side their bread is buttered on. I'm trying to get you to wake up. Or "get woke," as the new saying goes.
Oh Alice, please wake up.
 
Everybody demands higher wages. I stay out in front of it because I don't want to lose my people to the competition. Costs too much time and money to train newbies. Maybe I'd make more at the end of the day if I paid less, but as I said, I don't have shareholders to worry about and if I make a little less, that's ok. I'm betting that the stability and productivity make me more, though.
You're betting it makes you more? You don't know? Joe was right. Please continue the simulation.
 
Back
Top