No Soccer - Bad / No School - Catastrophic!

Justafan said:
Not taking sides in this “debate” but USMCA has made a lot of changes to what NAFTA was. Amount other things, it fixed a lot of the quota problems that worked against the US, helped the labor force in Mexico increase wages and lined the pockets of some political cronies.
Click to expand...

A lot of changes yes, but are they "major" changes? I would say no. Some of the percentages changed, but it's still a free trade agreement. DT made it sound like he was going to make it all one sided in favor of the US. If all three partners are happy with it, then no one got over on anybody, hence in my opinion, it's still basically the same thing.
[/QUOTE]
If we werent happy with it before, and now all three partners are happy, isn't that a win? you dont have to get over on somebody to make it a successful change. The fact that all three partners are happy is a success.
 
The Outlaw said:
Pick lawyers for what? C'mon, little girl, give me the names of 3. Or are you going to run like lawyer MacDre did? C'mon... let's discuss 3. Tell me about all that oppression.
Click to expand...

Bro, you're not interested in any serious discussion so stop pretending. You can't even give Obama OBL, c'mon bro.
 
Justafan said:
Not taking sides in this “debate” but USMCA has made a lot of changes to what NAFTA was. Amount other things, it fixed a lot of the quota problems that worked against the US, helped the labor force in Mexico increase wages and lined the pockets of some political cronies.
Click to expand...

A lot of changes yes, but are they "major" changes? I would say no. Some of the percentages changed, but it's still a free trade agreement. DT made it sound like he was going to make it all one sided in favor of the US. If all three partners are happy with it, then no one got over on anybody, hence in my opinion, it's still basically the same thing.
[/QUOTE]

"Trump made it sound like he was going to make it all one sided..." LMAO!

1595267614304.png
 
MSK357 said:
A lot of changes yes, but are they "major" changes? I would say no. Some of the percentages changed, but it's still a free trade agreement. DT made it sound like he was going to make it all one sided in favor of the US. If all three partners are happy with it, then no one got over on anybody, hence in my opinion, it's still basically the same thing.
Click to expand...
If we werent happy with it before, and now all three partners are happy, isn't that a win? you dont have to get over on somebody to make it a successful change. The fact that all three partners are happy is a success.
[/QUOTE]

It was a success before is my point. Who wasn't happy? All the companies that did business with Mexico and Canada were happy.

It's like this whole China thing. There's a trade deficit because we are the biggest consumers on the planet and we like a 2XL all cotton T-shirt at Walmart for $3.99. And people tend to forget that China actually has leverage in negotiations. We are just so used to having all the leverage that we can't handle somebody else having leverage.

NOBODY, put a gun to these companies heads to give up their intellectual property. They did it because after doing their cost benefit analysis they decided giving up the intellectual property WAS WORTH access to 1.2 billion customers. Both sides have leverage.

The world has changed and become much more competitive. It's not 1992 were we can just show up with the Dream Team and crush everybody by 60. We actually have to work harder for the same results.
 
Justafan said:
Bro, you're not interested in any serious discussion so stop pretending. You can't even give Obama OBL, c'mon bro.
Click to expand...

You're the loser sniveling about lawyers. C'mon, clown, give me 3 names of innocent black people killed by cops. Is it THAT difficult?

... and I never said I wouldn't give Bin Laden to Obama. And you might stop saying "Obama Bin Laden" since they both did significant damage to our country. I said that if you were going to credit Barack and Big Mike, you ALSO have to admonish them for putting illegals in cages and not just act like Trump invented that concept.

www.businessinsider.com

Obama officials rushed to explain photos from 2014 that went viral showing locked-up immigrant children — and Trump's facilities look the same

Several 2014 photos of detained immigrant children resurfaced and went viral in May. Former Obama administration officials tried to explain the context behind the photos, which appeared to show migrant kids locked up in cages. Recent photos of Trump administration detainment centers look the same.
www.businessinsider.com www.businessinsider.com
 
The Outlaw said:
A lot of changes yes, but are they "major" changes? I would say no. Some of the percentages changed, but it's still a free trade agreement. DT made it sound like he was going to make it all one sided in favor of the US. If all three partners are happy with it, then no one got over on anybody, hence in my opinion, it's still basically the same thing.
Click to expand...

"Trump made it sound like he was going to make it all one sided..." LMAO!

View attachment 8204
[/QUOTE]

Have you met DT?
 
Justafan said:
If we werent happy with it before, and now all three partners are happy, isn't that a win? you dont have to get over on somebody to make it a successful change. The fact that all three partners are happy is a success.
Click to expand...

It was a success before is my point. Who wasn't happy? All the companies that did business with Mexico and Canada were happy.

It's like this whole China thing. There's a trade deficit because we are the biggest consumers on the planet and we like a 2XL all cotton T-shirt at Walmart for $3.99. And people tend to forget that China actually has leverage in negotiations. We are just so used to having all the leverage that we can't handle somebody else having leverage.

NOBODY, put a gun to these companies heads to give up their intellectual property. They did it because after doing their cost benefit analysis they decided giving up the intellectual property WAS WORTH access to 1.2 billion customers. Both sides have leverage.

The world has changed and become much more competitive. It's not 1992 were we can just show up with the Dream Team and crush everybody by 60. We actually have to work harder for the same results.
[/QUOTE]

Yes... it was a win for Trump and us. Nonbinary Trudeau is having a tantrum and Mexico doesn't say shit anymore.
 
dad4 said:
One month ago you were telling us that the high case rate was just an artifact of more testing.

On the positive side, it looks like new cases are starting to drop in AZ. Hope it continues.
Click to expand...
All high school sports in California postponed until at least Dec. maybe Jan. Per CIF.
 
messy said:
I will do my own research with the stupidest method possible...I’ll use Glenn Beck as a source.
Click to expand...
messy said:
You wrote this crock and he’s wrong all the time. Nice try...

“You should watch Glenn Beck. While I don’t agree with all his preaching, he provides all the sources for his show so you can do your own fact checking.”
Click to expand...
Why don’t you fact check what you wrote yourself dipshit. I am out, waste of breath to provide facts to an idiot.
 
Justafan said:
If we werent happy with it before, and now all three partners are happy, isn't that a win? you dont have to get over on somebody to make it a successful change. The fact that all three partners are happy is a success.
Click to expand...

It was a success before is my point. Who wasn't happy? All the companies that did business with Mexico and Canada were happy.

It's like this whole China thing. There's a trade deficit because we are the biggest consumers on the planet and we like a 2XL all cotton T-shirt at Walmart for $3.99. And people tend to forget that China actually has leverage in negotiations. We are just so used to having all the leverage that we can't handle somebody else having leverage.

NOBODY, put a gun to these companies heads to give up their intellectual property. They did it because after doing their cost benefit analysis they decided giving up the intellectual property WAS WORTH access to 1.2 billion customers. Both sides have leverage.

The world has changed and become much more competitive. It's not 1992 were we can just show up with the Dream Team and crush everybody by 60. We actually have to work harder for the same results.
[/QUOTE]
Who wasnt happy? Both Republicans and Democrats. Joe Biden was repeatedly called out for supporting it. lol

www.politico.com

Democrats itching to take down Biden over free-trade past

The former VP's rivals home in on what they see as his Achilles' heel.
www.politico.com www.politico.com
 
Copa9 said:
All high school sports in California postponed until at least Dec. maybe Jan. Per CIF.
Click to expand...

"Following this announcement, each CIF Section Office will release their own calendar to reflect regular season starting and ending dates and Section playoffs. It is anticipated that most Section start dates will commence in December 2020 or January 2021."

Sounds to me like there's still some wiggle room there based on local offices.
 
The Outlaw said:
"Following this announcement, each CIF Section Office will release their own calendar to reflect regular season starting and ending dates and Section playoffs. It is anticipated that most Section start dates will commence in December 2020 or January 2021."

Sounds to me like there's still some wiggle room there based on local offices.
Click to expand...
I would also say it's contingent on schools starting in-person classes.
 
messy said:
I saw Trump on the news tonight. “Eventually it will go away and then I will be right.”
He actually said that.
He’s actually not trying to defend anything, unlike his supporters here.
He’s gonna get slaughtered. He sounds like a total nut who has given up.
Click to expand...
Translation: "I'm a self-absorbed petulant sore loser still wetting myself over 3 years later."

...yawn.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top