Only a lying idiot would say....the gentlemen testifying were T supporters and didn't break the law...That's one viewpoint. From another perspective, 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans.
Only a lying idiot would say....the gentlemen testifying were T supporters and didn't break the law...That's one viewpoint. From another perspective, 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans.
That’s why they like Trump, he’s just like them. He’s not actually religious, he’s not actually patriotic, he’s actually not great at business, he’s not actually a conservative, he laughs at people in the military for being suckers, he needs to make things up about others to make himself feel better about himself, he only backs the blue if they do what he wants them to do. They, like Trump, just use these things as a crutch in an attempt to con-vince others of the illusion they want to portray.That's one viewpoint. From another perspective, 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans.
A witness testified that Giuliani claimed to have plenty of theories, but not any evidence.
That’s why they like Trump, he’s just like them. He’s not actually religious, he’s not actually patriotic, he’s actually not great at business, he’s not actually a conservative, he laughs at people in the military for being suckers, he needs to make things up about others to make himself feel better about himself, he only backs the blue if they do what he wants them to do. They, like Trump, just use these things as a crutch in an attempt to con-vince others of the illusion they want to portray.
You seem to have an ingrown thought there.Only a lying idiot would say....the gentlemen testifying were T supporters and didn't break the law...
Your "deductive reasoning" sounds like it came from Daffy DuckYou seem to have an ingrown thought there.
Your "deductive reasoning" sounds like it came from Daffy Duck
" 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans "
Therefore if you're a conservative Republican who supported Trump, you're a scofflaw.....
I'm sure that makes perfect sense to Daffy, but are you that fucked up also?
It never phases that one to either misunderstand or in this case make up his own interpretation of what he ‘feels’ you meant to say."T-supporting scofflaws" is the subject of that phrase.
Please try harder.
He's always looking for something to be pissed off at.It never phases that one to either misunderstand or in this case make up his own interpretation of what he ‘feels’ you meant to say.
Your deductive reasoning is flawed"T-supporting scofflaws" is the subject of that phrase.
Please try harder.
That was not phrased well...You seem to have an ingrown thought there.
Your deductive reasoning is flawed
That's as far down the rabbit hole I'll venture..
Post an obtuse reply, change the subject and down the rabbit hole you go....That's not "deductive reasoning". It's elementary school grammar.
Post an obtuse reply, change the subject and down the rabbit hole you go....
I agree whatever reasoning you used in your reply was not "deductive reasoning"...it was, however, you rambling like Magoo...
Clear as mud Magoo.My statement was quite clear. Anything obtuse about it was on your end.
I feel there is a picture of LE in the dictionary under obtuse.My statement was quite clear. Anything obtuse about it was on your end.
I feel there is a picture of LE in the dictionary under obtuse.
I once told a friend that a comment he made was quite astute, he in an offended tone said, “WHAT DID YOU CALL ME!”.
Trump took it to a whole other level, however, you have to wonder if one of the Dem candidates was a sitting president that didn't get reelected if they would have pulled a similar stunt. We saw the weaponization of the IRS and FBI under Obama, so its not out of the realm of possibility. The doesn't condone what Trump did to try to intimidate other officials to assist in overturning the results. IMO that disqualifies him to run for office again.One of the interesting things about the hearings and before them is they were saying it is crazy and not patriotic to accept election results.
Lets take a look back in history to see if the D party abides by that line of thought.
Al Gore, January 2001:Trump took it to a whole other level, however, you have to wonder if one of the Dem candidates was a sitting president that didn't get reelected if they would have pulled a similar stunt. We saw the weaponization of the IRS and FBI under Obama, so its not out of the realm of possibility. The doesn't condone what Trump did to try to intimidate other officials to assist in overturning the results. IMO that disqualifies him to run for office again.