Insurrection hearings

That's one viewpoint. From another perspective, 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans.
Only a lying idiot would say....the gentlemen testifying were T supporters and didn't break the law...
 
That's one viewpoint. From another perspective, 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans.
That’s why they like Trump, he’s just like them. He’s not actually religious, he’s not actually patriotic, he’s actually not great at business, he’s not actually a conservative, he laughs at people in the military for being suckers, he needs to make things up about others to make himself feel better about himself, he only backs the blue if they do what he wants them to do. They, like Trump, just use these things as a crutch in an attempt to con-vince others of the illusion they want to portray.
 
A witness testified that Giuliani claimed to have plenty of theories, but not any evidence.

Multiple posters ( Many ) accused YOU of disgusting foul repulsive behavior
on the original SoCalSoccer forum, citing your actions with evidence that was
verifiable and easy to locate until the initial site was purposely corrupted and
then deleted. As was the same on the second site until it was corrupted and deleted.

There is mountains of evidence that show what happened on/after Nov 3rd 2020.
The problem was not the secured evidence, it was the corruption of the real voter
evidence that has NEVER happened before.

Example yesterday, Adam Schiff rolled out the Mother/Daughter team that everyone
knows committed Voter Fraud during the 3:00 am shutdown. What he did was what he
and YOU do all the time, that is change/alter the original evidence and use " Emotion "
as a hammer to try and pound blatant falsehoods into the public discourse.

THE TRUTH IS COMING OUT, AND RUBY FREEMAN AND HER
DAUGHTER WANDREA ARSHAYE MOSS ( AS WILL MANY OTHERS )
WILL REGRET BEING USED AS A DEMOCRAT/RACE INFLUANCING TOOL
TO HIDE THE TRUTH ABOUT THE MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD THEY AND
OTHERS PERPATRATED ON NOV 3RD 2020 THAT INSTALLED A LEATHAL
DESTRUCTIVE FORCE THAT IS DESTROYING AMERICA.

THEY WILL EVENTUALLY REGRET THEIR ACTIONS JUST AS YOU WILL AT SOME
POINT.

YOU CANNOT HIDE FROM THE TRUTH !
 
That’s why they like Trump, he’s just like them. He’s not actually religious, he’s not actually patriotic, he’s actually not great at business, he’s not actually a conservative, he laughs at people in the military for being suckers, he needs to make things up about others to make himself feel better about himself, he only backs the blue if they do what he wants them to do. They, like Trump, just use these things as a crutch in an attempt to con-vince others of the illusion they want to portray.

You are sick with TDS.
Seek Mental help before you lose it.
 
You seem to have an ingrown thought there.
Your "deductive reasoning" sounds like it came from Daffy Duck
" 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans "
Therefore if you're a conservative Republican who supported Trump, you're a scofflaw.....
I'm sure that makes perfect sense to Daffy, but are you that fucked up also?
 
Your "deductive reasoning" sounds like it came from Daffy Duck
" 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans "
Therefore if you're a conservative Republican who supported Trump, you're a scofflaw.....
I'm sure that makes perfect sense to Daffy, but are you that fucked up also?

"T-supporting scofflaws" is the subject of that phrase.

Please try harder.
 
One of the interesting things about the hearings and before them is they were saying it is crazy and not patriotic to accept election results.

Lets take a look back in history to see if the D party abides by that line of thought.

 
That's not "deductive reasoning". It's elementary school grammar.
Post an obtuse reply, change the subject and down the rabbit hole you go....
I agree whatever reasoning you used in your reply was not "deductive reasoning"...it was, however, you rambling like Magoo...
 
Post an obtuse reply, change the subject and down the rabbit hole you go....
I agree whatever reasoning you used in your reply was not "deductive reasoning"...it was, however, you rambling like Magoo...

My statement was quite clear. Anything obtuse about it was on your end.
 
One of the interesting things about the hearings and before them is they were saying it is crazy and not patriotic to accept election results.

Lets take a look back in history to see if the D party abides by that line of thought.

Trump took it to a whole other level, however, you have to wonder if one of the Dem candidates was a sitting president that didn't get reelected if they would have pulled a similar stunt. We saw the weaponization of the IRS and FBI under Obama, so its not out of the realm of possibility. The doesn't condone what Trump did to try to intimidate other officials to assist in overturning the results. IMO that disqualifies him to run for office again.
 
Trump took it to a whole other level, however, you have to wonder if one of the Dem candidates was a sitting president that didn't get reelected if they would have pulled a similar stunt. We saw the weaponization of the IRS and FBI under Obama, so its not out of the realm of possibility. The doesn't condone what Trump did to try to intimidate other officials to assist in overturning the results. IMO that disqualifies him to run for office again.
Al Gore, January 2001:

 
Back
Top