Insurrection hearings


View attachment 13946
And yet we find that...

The survey of 1,541 U.S. adults, which was conducted from June 10-13, found that if another presidential election were held today, more registered voters say they would cast ballots for Donald Trump (44%) than for Biden (42%) — even though the House Jan. 6 committee has spent the last week linking Trump to what it called a “seditious conspiracy” to""

 
And yet we find that...

The survey of 1,541 U.S. adults, which was conducted from June 10-13, found that if another presidential election were held today, more registered voters say they would cast ballots for Donald Trump (44%) than for Biden (42%) — even though the House Jan. 6 committee has spent the last week linking Trump to what it called a “seditious conspiracy” to""


Heck I'd probably even be willing to tell a pollster that I'd vote for a ham sandwich lol Biden. But come on, it would be worse if Bernie or Warren was in there. So don't forget to consider 'the worse luck our bad luck saved us from.'

My take is the next president is going to be decided in the Republican primary anyway. That said, are you hoping Trump wins?
 
That said, are you hoping Trump wins?
I am pointing out that despite the hopes of espola and husker regarding the hearings, they have not moved the needle one bit. In fact people would still prefer T of B based on that poll.

The hearings are a dog and pony show. People care about inflation, the economy, etc....and yet Biden is busy doing the important things instead like

That is one of many reasons he is polling terrible and why the Ds are in for big losses in November.
 
I am pointing out that despite the hopes of espola and husker regarding the hearings, they have not moved the needle one bit. In fact people would still prefer T of B based on that poll.

The hearings are a dog and pony show. People care about inflation, the economy, etc....and yet Biden is busy doing the important things instead like

That is one of many reasons he is polling terrible and why the Ds are in for big losses in November.
I am always intrigued to find my mind being read by experts on the internet.

What are my hopes?
 
(The Hill) – A prosecutor who worked on the Watergate case against Richard Nixon 50 years ago said on Sunday that a Georgia election interference case is the most likely to send former President Trump to prison.

“I think that’s enough. If you’re asking me which of the cases right now, which one is going to send Donald Trump to prison, that’s the case,” Nick Akerman told MSNBC on Sunday, referring to a January 2021 call between Trump and Georgia’s secretary of state.

“If I had to put my money on one prosecution that’s going to go forward here that would send Donald Trump to jail, it’s Georgia,” Akerman, a former prosecutor with the Watergate Special Prosecution Force under Archibald Cox and Leon Jaworski, said. “No question about it.”

Fulton County in Georgia has convened a special grand jury to investigate Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in the state. The case centers on the call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R).

Trump, who had asked Raffensperger to "find" 11,780 votes to overturn President Biden's victory in the state, has described the phone call as “perfect.”

“My phone call to the Georgia Secretary of State, with many other people, including numerous lawyers, knowingly on the line, was absolutely PERFECT and appropriate. YES, it was a PERFECT CALL,” he said in a statement emailed late Sunday.

entire article:
Watergate prosecutor: Georgia case could ‘send Donald Trump to prison' (msn.com)
 
E started the thread so . . . ?
I hope she runs for president.
My first post
"Despite all the outrage and the threats of charging “insurrectionists” with sedition—the act of attempting to overthrow the government—proving them based upon actual facts and evidence seems to be increasingly unlikely. For example, Michael Cantrell reported on America’s Sheriff that:

“Many of the trials for individuals involved in the Capitol riot of January 6th have started and much to the chagrin of liberals everywhere, the charges these folks are facing aren’t quite as serious as we were all led to believe they would be. In fact, the Justice Department has now said that the body of evidence in these cases is not as damaging as it was previously thought to be.”

Further, developing reports indicate that none of the 400 people who have been arrested for their involvement in the riot have been charged with sedition, according to the Post Millennial. The most serious charge that has been brought against a defendant in this incident has been assault. To be clear, there is quite a leap between the charges of assault—and the charges of conspiring to overthrow the government."
Yours, nuff said.
 
The opening statement was too long. Let's get to the good stuff.
You were sooo excited when this began. husker as well.

At some point you have to realize the Ds running the show are Lucy holding the football and you (Charlie Brown) are the one trying to line up that kick...that never happens because she pulls away the ball.

You fall for it ever time.
 
You were sooo excited when this began. husker as well.

At some point you have to realize the Ds running the show are Lucy holding the football and you (Charlie Brown) are the one trying to line up that kick...that never happens because she pulls away the ball.

You fall for it ever time.

Which of t's crimes as exposed in the hearings are you trying to excuse here?
 
In spite of that, he did not follow t's orders. He put the Constitution and American values ahead of his own interests.

Wasn't that obvious?
Obvious?
What seems obvious, 99% of conservative Republicans would have done the same thing.
Everyone of those Republicans denied Trumps request to break the law.
You seem to be assuming that because of ones political affiliation, one is a scofflaw?
Again your point?
 
Obvious?
What seems obvious, 99% of conservative Republicans would have done the same thing.
Everyone of those Republicans denied Trumps request to break the law.
You seem to be assuming that because of ones political affiliation, one is a scofflaw?
Again your point?

That's one viewpoint. From another perspective, 100% of t-supporting scofflaws have claimed to be conservative Republicans.
 
Back
Top