Insurrection hearings

It could be argued that all in Congress who voted against Trump's second impeachment are guilty of supporting the insurrection and thus should be ineligible to run for Congress or any other political office.

and now back to reality
 
MTG is in court today trying to figure out how that unknown poster who used her name posted all those treasonous things.

Lawyer: Did you say this?
MTG: I never said that.
<lawyer plays youtube video of someone calling herself MTG saying that>

Lather, rinse, repeat.
 
MTG is in court today trying to figure out how that unknown poster who used her name posted all those treasonous things.

Lawyer: Did you say this?
MTG: I never said that.
<lawyer plays youtube video of someone calling herself MTG saying that>

Lather, rinse, repeat.
1650662883791.png
 
MTG is in court today trying to figure out how that unknown poster who used her name posted all those treasonous things.

Lawyer: Did you say this?
MTG: I never said that.
<lawyer plays youtube video of someone calling herself MTG saying that>

Lather, rinse, repeat.
... didn't watch, what treasonous things?
 
The opening statement was too long. Let's get to the good stuff.
There is no good stuff.

It is a star chamber. Recall that Pelosi did not allow the Rs to sit who they wanted to on the commission.

But yeah drink the cool aide that is being fed to you.
 
There is no "news" here. In a usual hearing, there are adversarial interrogators who ask witnesses questions they weren't expecting, and they badger and argue with them.

Here, the illegally-formed committee is monolithic, all handpicked by Nancy Pelosi. There are no Republicans on it, just two ex-Republicans, one of whom is retiring to spend more time with his MSNBC, the other who will be running as an Independent with Democrat support against the Republican candidate.

They will present videotaped and edited "testimony." This is canned material that could just be released as a DVD to the press. Instead, it's being sold as a completely fake "news" event.

Where is the "news"? What's live here? The presenters introducing the videotaped and carefully edited interviews?
 
There is no "news" here. In a usual hearing, there are adversarial interrogators who ask witnesses questions they weren't expecting, and they badger and argue with them.

Here, the illegally-formed committee is monolithic, all handpicked by Nancy Pelosi. There are no Republicans on it, just two ex-Republicans, one of whom is retiring to spend more time with his MSNBC, the other who will be running as an Independent with Democrat support against the Republican candidate.

They will present videotaped and edited "testimony." This is canned material that could just be released as a DVD to the press. Instead, it's being sold as a completely fake "news" event.

Where is the "news"? What's live here? The presenters introducing the videotaped and carefully edited interviews?

"Your dishonor will remain"
 
There is no "news" here. In a usual hearing, there are adversarial interrogators who ask witnesses questions they weren't expecting, and they badger and argue with them.

Here, the illegally-formed committee is monolithic, all handpicked by Nancy Pelosi. There are no Republicans on it, just two ex-Republicans, one of whom is retiring to spend more time with his MSNBC, the other who will be running as an Independent with Democrat support against the Republican candidate.

They will present videotaped and edited "testimony." This is canned material that could just be released as a DVD to the press. Instead, it's being sold as a completely fake "news" event.

Where is the "news"? What's live here? The presenters introducing the videotaped and carefully edited interviews?

So are you in the "Hang Mike Pence" group?
 
Meanwhile :
Inflation is up to 8.6 %
We are still begging infant formula from around the world
The border in Texas is still being overwhelmed by illegal immigrants
Fentanyl continues to be smuggled across the border poisoning & killing thousands
Gas & food prices continue to climb and have essentially doubled since 2020
There is a looming food crisis around the world that will potentially starve millions
Looks like rolling blackouts this summer....brilliant!

The good news is Bill Barr and Ivanka knew the vote count was legit....
 
Last edited:
So are you in the "Hang Mike Pence" group?
First off it wasnt an insurrection.

Next: If you are going to have a committee look into the whole thing both parties have to be involved.

When Pelosi didn't allow the Rs to put who they want on the committee...that tells you all you need to know. That is the key point.

You might like the idea of a farce like that, but most people don't.

The only people this appeals to is idiots and rabid partisans like yourself.

You and husker get together to cuddle on the sofa and watch it?
 
First off it wasnt an insurrection.

Next: If you are going to have a committee look into the whole thing both parties have to be involved.

When Pelosi didn't allow the Rs to put who they want on the committee...that tells you all you need to know. That is the key point.

You might like the idea of a farce like that, but most people don't.

The only people this appeals to is idiots and rabid partisans like yourself.

You and husker get together to cuddle on the sofa and watch it?

Sorry, but the denial seating area is overflowing already.
 
Sorry, but the denial seating area is overflowing already.
Because you are sitting in those seats denying reality.

You apparently like the idea of a partisan committee that did not allow the the other party to place their own members on the committee.

In your mind that is the way it should be....ie a kangaroo court or star chamber.

You like it because without any opposition or cross examination the committee can come up with their predetermined conclusion...and that is what you want and need to hear.

Running a hearing in that manner is how banana republics like to do things. Determine the conclusion, then create the committee that will give you that conclusion.

Then the clapping seals like you will say see the committee said something bad happened.

But try this. Explain to me how a committee that did not allow the other party to put in their own members has any semblance of impartiality to it?

Will your response be link? or more likely some other evasive none answer. It will be tough for you. You are so partisan in your beliefs that you cannot step back from that and realize the committee and its "findings" are a farce and were predetermined from day one.
 
Back
Top