Insurrection hearings

Meanwhile, Hannity is making excuses.

Race card! Gas prices! etc!
 
Desert Hound said:
There is no "news" here. In a usual hearing, there are adversarial interrogators who ask witnesses questions they weren't expecting, and they badger and argue with them.

Here, the illegally-formed committee is monolithic, all handpicked by Nancy Pelosi. There are no Republicans on it, just two ex-Republicans, one of whom is retiring to spend more time with his MSNBC, the other who will be running as an Independent with Democrat support against the Republican candidate.

They will present videotaped and edited "testimony." This is canned material that could just be released as a DVD to the press. Instead, it's being sold as a completely fake "news" event.

Where is the "news"? What's live here? The presenters introducing the videotaped and carefully edited interviews?
Click to expand...

So are you in the "Hang Mike Pence" group?
 
Meanwhile :
Inflation is up to 8.6 %
We are still begging infant formula from around the world
The border in Texas is still being overwhelmed by illegal immigrants
Fentanyl continues to be smuggled across the border poisoning & killing thousands
Gas & food prices continue to climb and have essentially doubled since 2020
There is a looming food crisis around the world that will potentially starve millions
Looks like rolling blackouts this summer....brilliant!

The good news is Bill Barr and Ivanka knew the vote count was legit....
 
Last edited:
espola said:
So are you in the "Hang Mike Pence" group?
Click to expand...
First off it wasnt an insurrection.

Next: If you are going to have a committee look into the whole thing both parties have to be involved.

When Pelosi didn't allow the Rs to put who they want on the committee...that tells you all you need to know. That is the key point.

You might like the idea of a farce like that, but most people don't.

The only people this appeals to is idiots and rabid partisans like yourself.

You and husker get together to cuddle on the sofa and watch it?
 
Desert Hound said:
First off it wasnt an insurrection.

Next: If you are going to have a committee look into the whole thing both parties have to be involved.

When Pelosi didn't allow the Rs to put who they want on the committee...that tells you all you need to know. That is the key point.

You might like the idea of a farce like that, but most people don't.

The only people this appeals to is idiots and rabid partisans like yourself.

You and husker get together to cuddle on the sofa and watch it?
Click to expand...

Sorry, but the denial seating area is overflowing already.
 
espola said:
Sorry, but the denial seating area is overflowing already.
Click to expand...
Because you are sitting in those seats denying reality.

You apparently like the idea of a partisan committee that did not allow the the other party to place their own members on the committee.

In your mind that is the way it should be....ie a kangaroo court or star chamber.

You like it because without any opposition or cross examination the committee can come up with their predetermined conclusion...and that is what you want and need to hear.

Running a hearing in that manner is how banana republics like to do things. Determine the conclusion, then create the committee that will give you that conclusion.

Then the clapping seals like you will say see the committee said something bad happened.

But try this. Explain to me how a committee that did not allow the other party to put in their own members has any semblance of impartiality to it?

Will your response be link? or more likely some other evasive none answer. It will be tough for you. You are so partisan in your beliefs that you cannot step back from that and realize the committee and its "findings" are a farce and were predetermined from day one.
 
Desert Hound said:
Because you are sitting in those seats denying reality.

You apparently like the idea of a partisan committee that did not allow the the other party to place their own members on the committee.

In your mind that is the way it should be....ie a kangaroo court or star chamber.

You like it because without any opposition or cross examination the committee can come up with their predetermined conclusion...and that is what you want and need to hear.

Running a hearing in that manner is how banana republics like to do things. Determine the conclusion, then create the committee that will give you that conclusion.

Then the clapping seals like you will say see the committee said something bad happened.

But try this. Explain to me how a committee that did not allow the other party to put in their own members has any semblance of impartiality to it?

Will your response be link? or more likely some other evasive none answer. It will be tough for you. You are so partisan in your beliefs that you cannot step back from that and realize the committee and its "findings" are a farce and were predetermined from day one.
Click to expand...
You gotta admire a man who sticks to his convictions despite seeing the evidence in front of his face.

Please continue.
 
espola said:
You gotta admire a man who sticks to his convictions despite seeing the evidence in front of his face.

Please continue.
Click to expand...
This thing is just going to divide the nation even further! Divide those that love and believe in America from those that love and believe trump.
 
Happened again said:
you have TDS
Click to expand...
Wouldn’t that be DHS in this case?

And until the donald no longer holds sway over the majority of Republicans, making him the de facto leader of the GOP, and/or he is locked up (mentally or criminally or a combo of both) he is then the main influencer and will be discussed. You people are afraid to do anything that would make you look untrumpy in anyway. You finally have a role model you can dream about don’t deny that now! Lol!
 
Desert Hound said:
Because you are sitting in those seats denying reality.

You apparently like the idea of a partisan committee that did not allow the the other party to place their own members on the committee.

In your mind that is the way it should be....ie a kangaroo court or star chamber.

You like it because without any opposition or cross examination the committee can come up with their predetermined conclusion...and that is what you want and need to hear.

Running a hearing in that manner is how banana republics like to do things. Determine the conclusion, then create the committee that will give you that conclusion.

Then the clapping seals like you will say see the committee said something bad happened.

But try this. Explain to me how a committee that did not allow the other party to put in their own members has any semblance of impartiality to it?

Will your response be link? or more likely some other evasive none answer. It will be tough for you. You are so partisan in your beliefs that you cannot step back from that and realize the committee and its "findings" are a farce and were predetermined from day one.
Click to expand...
Only predetermined because we all saw what happened except you deniers. trump is good at plausible deniability, another thing he learned from his consiglieri.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Only predetermined because we all saw what happened except you deniers. trump is good at plausible deniability, another thing he learned from his consiglieri.
Click to expand...
If the facts were so obvious there would be no need to deny the other party representation on the committee.

I find it amazing that you and espola like clearly partisan hearings.

In the end it wont move the needle.

People are concerned about the economy. Your Prez and your party are doing a terrible job. The election in Nov is going to be ugly for the Ds.

This is what people are concerned about. Not the dog and pony committee stuff you like.

Screenshot (2333).png

Screenshot (2332).png
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Wouldn’t that be DHS in this case?

And until the donald no longer holds sway over the majority of Republicans, making him the de facto leader of the GOP, and/or he is locked up (mentally or criminally or a combo of both) he is then the main influencer and will be discussed. You people are afraid to do anything that would make you look untrumpy in anyway. You finally have a role model you can dream about don’t deny that now! Lol!
Click to expand...

any idea what took place in the recent GA Governor primaries ?
 
Desert Hound said:
If the facts were so obvious there would be no need to deny the other party representation on the committee.

I find it amazing that you and espola like clearly partisan hearings.

In the end it wont move the needle.

People are concerned about the economy. Your Prez and your party are doing a terrible job. The election in Nov is going to be ugly for the Ds.

This is what people are concerned about. Not the dog and pony committee stuff you like.

View attachment 13898

View attachment 13899
Click to expand...

Biden out there blaming Putin today

he is just a helpless victim in all of this
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Wouldn’t that be DHS in this case?

And until the donald no longer holds sway over the majority of Republicans, making him the de facto leader of the GOP, and/or he is locked up (mentally or criminally or a combo of both) he is then the main influencer and will be discussed. You people are afraid to do anything that would make you look untrumpy in anyway. You finally have a role model you can dream about don’t deny that now! Lol!
Click to expand...
you def have TDS. The donald can go to jail, many won't care, he's one person. That will play out through court proceedings, where it should. Somewhat an american thing, don't you think?

sounds you are fine with intentionl negligence of government organizations. And if it wasn't negligence, then that's worse. I hear many lies were told yesterday during the made for tv series. Scripts are really easy to follow, lines can be rehearsted. Kinda weird to see soviet style hearings broadcasted on live tv on US soil...very weird. good thing most people don't care. Hockey and nations league is much more entertaining.
 
Desert Hound said:
If the facts were so obvious there would be no need to deny the other party representation on the committee.

I find it amazing that you and espola like clearly partisan hearings.

In the end it wont move the needle.

People are concerned about the economy. Your Prez and your party are doing a terrible job. The election in Nov is going to be ugly for the Ds.

This is what people are concerned about. Not the dog and pony committee stuff you like.

View attachment 13898

View attachment 13899
Click to expand...
So you are afraid we can’t chew gum and walk? Is because trying to do do gives you trouble?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top