This goes right back to the argument that there are choices for people/kids/families at all levels and you can pay/invest as much as you want for Johnny/Sally depending on what you are looking for. There are options for all levels of play.
I agree with you...the value has to justify the cost and everybody has their own set of circumstances/variables to determine that. If the value is not there for you, don’t do it.
I’d argue sports are a way for athletes in general to get into schools they probably would not get into otherwise. Like many athletes - Football, BBall, Baseball, etc. But isn’t that the the same for kids that have talents in other areas - singing, instruments, robotics, etc. I don’t buy it’s all about privileged kids. On every team we have been on there is a pretty decent mix of family income levels from what I can tell...maybe that’s just been our situation.
On the Women’s side the US is still dominating....going for the three peat in a couple of years. The model in place, while not not perfect and can use some improvement, up to this point has produced a quality National Team product and results. I think every person on the Team/Pool worked their ass off to get there and that it has much more to do with talent, drive, and commitment rather than privilege.
As far as helping others, yes, we could all do more. As far as Stanford goes...she can spell it, and she might have better odds at Lotto.