So here is the point that everyone is missing. The guy who never pulled out the gun after the melay was left to walk back to the parking lot alone with his back pack returned 15 minutes later. He looked very much at ease talking and allowing his back pack to be searched. It was a smart move on his part because by then roads were closed helicopter flying he would have been searched and car searched aswell this is my opinion. This isn't what I heard it's what I saw I was feet away from it all. There was a boy 16 years old who strongly admitted he saw the gun yet did not want to get involved and talk to the police. Another kid I talked to said he saw the butt of the gun in his hand from within the camouflaged bag. How can people say with certainty it was just a verbal threat. As witness to it all I'm more convinced he had a gun then no gun. I doubt the police went to his car to search it or even the path by the bushes he walked by while walking away. He walked away with the camouflaged bag people only to return 15 minutes later you think he went to get a hot dog or use the restroom I'm smarter then that.
This is scary. CCW, off duty police, whatever. Don't bring weapons people!!! Emotions run high at these things and people overreact. Not to mention, mass shootings and such.
Lots of things to consider here, but if I saw a 14 year old boy sucker punch my 10 year old boy while playing soccer on a field in which the 14 year old was not even playing, I would have a hard time staying put. That's 40% older and stronger and who knows if he's using a weapon or what have you. I'm human and when my kid is attacked by someone 40% older, highly doubt I sit there and watch! From what I hear, the Albion crowd was just trying to get the kid who ran and assaulted the athlete away from the victim. I wasn't there, but keeping human reaction real here. It is not logical to think a parent is going to sit and watch their kid get pummeled by an older kid not even playing in the game.
My club demands good sideline etiquette and just about every team we have come across has been pleasant for the most part. Emotions run high and people get loud, but most people remain civil. I'll admit I have not seen this type of violence and aggression at a game, ever. Yellow cards and even red cards will come out. It's why refs. have them. Coaches will dispute calls. Boys will get physical and stand their ground. I like to stick with reality. If the sideline behavior was to the point of insults/threats/etc. , action/discussions etc. should take place. If kids played dirty, the same. I just don't blame passion and support for assault.
What's next? No cheering when your team scores, because the other team's fans gets angry and may assault your kids on the field? No using your body, because a kid may fall and older siblings may run on the field and assault your kid?
I don't know the history of either team or club, but I do know without a doubt that assault is assault and never warranted especially from someone on the sideline. Once assault takes place, people have a right to self defense. Take it from there especially with a 10 year old out muscled by a 14 year old.
If these teams have a history of insulting and threatening teams, refs., etc. then of course, they may need to address sideline behavior. The bottom line remains that there was no stampede or physical altercations pre-breach. Now, verbal threats and insults should not be tolerated and should be addressed, but they do not warrant assault, period!