It's not my side dumb dumb. As I said, I think he will and should lose given the evidence to date. But it's very clear there is evidence of voter fraud. To say there's none completely undermines your side's credibility.
What is "my side"?
It's not my side dumb dumb. As I said, I think he will and should lose given the evidence to date. But it's very clear there is evidence of voter fraud. To say there's none completely undermines your side's credibility.
I've always pictured you more as a triange kind of guy with 3 sides. I'm an icosahedron.What is "my side"?
That's an opinion column (strike one) in the Washington Examiner (strike two) that quotes the lawyer for only one side (you;'re out).
Missed this - spending too much time in the Bad News Thread.Back to good news, any read on the following is welcome.
National daily reported cases seem to be momentarily hovering at 200k. One million per 5 days.
Some states in the middle of the country seem to be seriously slowing down, usually in the 6% to 10% confirmed cases range. (arguably depending on temperature, pop density, local rules, degree of compliance, and so on.)
I place this as meaning that overall cases should slow down as the nation nears 6%. (I took the low end on the assumption that the states with North Dakota style habits are already experiencing North Dakota style case loads.)
Anyway, if it tapers off at 6% then things start calming down around Dec 31. Or, once we add in a bump for the Christmas travel, late January.
That conclusion is not too different from the (much more sophisticated) IHME national projection.
Santa Clara got their first batch of vaccine. Front-line workers and residents of nursing homes first. While this is a relatively small population and may not do much to slow the spread, it has the potential to have a significant effect on the death rate since these older folks are, by far, at the highest risk. I think I'll drink to this - one Margarita for Dad and a shot of Vodka for Grace.
Santa Clara got their first batch of vaccine. Front-line workers and residents of nursing homes first. While this is a relatively small population and may not do much to slow the spread, it has the potential to have a significant effect on the death rate since these older folks are, by far, at the highest risk. I think I'll drink to this - one Margarita for Dad and a shot of Vodka for Grace.
The distribution plans do bug me a bit.
With more than a passing knowledge of nursing homes, I understand there is a group of willing, at risk, and relatively compliant population with an ease of distribution on site (vaccine needs to be kept extremely cold and distributed quickly).
... but that population has no outside exposure at present other than the facility staff. Staff that should be one the priority list as essential workers... many of which are low income (social equity in distribution) and likely live in communities with a greater rate of spread.
Seems like you could protect two groups (workers and elderly) more efficiently with fewer doses.
We have body cameras for the police, which is a great idea. Why don't we have cameras set up at all the polling stations and have it live-streamed?
Hmmm. Based on “expected” deaths we are overAm I missing something? Pulled these numbers straight from the CDC website, but am not 100% sure this show what I think it shows:
View attachment 9652
You have to scroll down a ways to get to the graph.Hmmm. Based on “expected” deaths we are over
So what am I missing? They expected less deaths in 2020 than 2019 or 2018? Just trying to understand where the gaps are.You have to scroll down a ways to get to the graph.
Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19
Figures present excess deaths associated with COVID-19 at the national and state levels.www.cdc.gov
Agreed. It looks like conflicting information to me as well.So what am I missing? They expected less deaths in 2020 than 2019 or 2018? Just trying to understand where the gaps are.
@dad4 hit hardest with this one.
"During a news conference last week, Gov. Cuomo put up a chart highlighting where the novel coronavirus is being spread. It turns out, a shocking 74 percent of new cases were caught at gatherings in private homes. Restaurants and bars, meanwhile, accounted for just 1.43 percent."