Get ready folks

So is MLSN the only hold out?
And EA has been silent. Although anecdotally, an EA coach told a friend of ours their player would be with the younger age group in 2026 due to their Q4 birthdate.

If MLSN and EA don't follow suit, they still have their bio-banding option available. I've seen both EA players and MLSN players bio-banded this season. Will be interesting to see how this shakes out.
 
If MLSN starts to biobanding Q4 players, then it will be a sign.
Mlsn already biobands q4 players. They can do it for 3 players iirc. Same for mls 2.


We played an MLSN team in a tournament last month who were playing up because they had some bio-banded players. The tournament wouldn’t let them play their age because of that.
Unusual unless it was a young mlsn team. Dues don’t typically cover the costs outside of the non mls sponsored events and older players are reluctant to do non mls tournaments where they could get injured. Some tournaments like surf excepted.
 
We played an MLSN team in a tournament last month who were playing up because they had some bio-banded players. The tournament wouldn’t let them play their age because of that.

My kid's friend is in an MLSN team, and they did not play any tournament in the summer because they have biobanding players. They only did several preseason scrimmages. He was not happy when my kid's team participated in five tournaments, and heard that he wants to do tryout practice with my son's team this week.
 
BY to SY change is a 5 month shift in player pool! I expect next year half of our team will be replaced by older kids. The domino effect will impact playing time and playing positions even if one doesn’t get demoted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBB
BY to SY change is a 5 month shift in player pool! I expect next year half of our team will be replaced by older kids. The domino effect will impact playing time and playing positions even if one doesn’t get demoted.
What percent of youth club teams in SoCal are comprised of kids born between Aug 1 - Dec 31?

Even though Aug-Dec is 42% of the year, I'm guessing the % of players from those months is actually much lower. There was a study on this, and I think they showed it was less than 20%, but I could be wrong.

I'm curious what everyone is seeing. Is it closer to 40% or 20% or something else? From what I see, it's closer to 20%.
 
What percent of youth club teams in SoCal are comprised of kids born between Aug 1 - Dec 31?

Even though Aug-Dec is 42% of the year, I'm guessing the % of players from those months is actually much lower. There was a study on this, and I think they showed it was less than 20%, but I could be wrong.

I'm curious what everyone is seeing. Is it closer to 40% or 20% or something else? From what I see, it's closer to 20%.
Our club is unique because it has recently merged with another local club. Most players from that smaller club stayed with their original teams. A lot of talents will get sorted out at next year’s tryout. Just within the club for my son’s year, there are 9-10 late birthday players who will be vying to get on the top team.
 
What percent of youth club teams in SoCal are comprised of kids born between Aug 1 - Dec 31?

Even though Aug-Dec is 42% of the year, I'm guessing the % of players from those months is actually much lower. There was a study on this, and I think they showed it was less than 20%, but I could be wrong.

I'm curious what everyone is seeing. Is it closer to 40% or 20% or something else? From what I see, it's closer to 20%.

Although it is only 20% overall, the most significant change will be on the top team. Q3/Q4 non-Surf ECNL and GA players will likely attempt to break into the Surf ECNL team to gain the best college recruiting exposure.
 
Although it is only 20% overall, the most significant change will be on the top team. Q3/Q4 non-Surf ECNL and GA players will likely attempt to break into the Surf ECNL team to gain the best college recruiting exposure.
Might be Surf recruiting trapped players from other clubs as well. ;-)
 
What percent of youth club teams in SoCal are comprised of kids born between Aug 1 - Dec 31?

Even though Aug-Dec is 42% of the year, I'm guessing the % of players from those months is actually much lower. There was a study on this, and I think they showed it was less than 20%, but I could be wrong.

I'm curious what everyone is seeing. Is it closer to 40% or 20% or something else? From what I see, it's closer to 20%.
35% of kids born in 2010 were born from July to December. That means more or less 1/3rd of players on each team are affected. I am aware that some RL teams in this age group have nearly 50% of the kids impacted by this who would qualify to play down a year with the 2011 birth year.
 
I think the botom line is Jan -July kids who dont start and play significant roles will be moving down 1-2 levels. Aug-December kids who start on 1&2nd team will move up. Even 3rd team kids are flexing.....

I know of a 3rd team thats been playing friendlies with a ECNL national champion a year down and beating them. Those Trapped kids 8 out 17 and the familys on the 3rd team all want the spots on the National champion team.

Its going to be huge mess.... The one thing I can gurantee is those trapped kids wont be talked down into taking second team spots at any club.
 
I just think it's important to keep in mind that for the overwhelming majority of kids, this will just shuffle teams around a bit, make it a bit harder to see what teams kids belong on, and cause some headaches with higher-level teams and scheduling, but otherwise will be a non-impactful change for most kids. It's really only the top-end of competitive leagues and teams where it's going to make any potential real difference with kids being shuffled around; the other 98% of kids playing won't notice much (aside from some current teammates and friends playing on other teams now).

I figure kids below ECNL probably won't be impacted much at all (aide from maybe some individual play time and/or parents being upset). In my son's club, for example, their NPL team is planning on staying composed as-is, and just playing up a year in the SY leagues and competitions. It's not like that makes any real difference, as long as you find a bracket which is competitive; these are not kids vying for starting roles on the "real" MLSN teams or anything, and HS soccer will probably be more impactful for their college potential soon anyway. My 2c, anyway.
 
I just think it's important to keep in mind that for the overwhelming majority of kids, this will just shuffle teams around a bit, make it a bit harder to see what teams kids belong on, and cause some headaches with higher-level teams and scheduling, but otherwise will be a non-impactful change for most kids. It's really only the top-end of competitive leagues and teams where it's going to make any potential real difference with kids being shuffled around; the other 98% of kids playing won't notice much (aside from some current teammates and friends playing on other teams now).

I figure kids below ECNL probably won't be impacted much at all (aide from maybe some individual play time and/or parents being upset). In my son's club, for example, their NPL team is planning on staying composed as-is, and just playing up a year in the SY leagues and competitions. It's not like that makes any real difference, as long as you find a bracket which is competitive; these are not kids vying for starting roles on the "real" MLSN teams or anything, and HS soccer will probably be more impactful for their college potential soon anyway. My 2c, anyway.
I think the botom line is Jan -July kids who dont start and play significant roles will be moving down 1-2 levels. Aug-December kids who start on 1&2nd team will move up. Even 3rd team kids are flexing.....

I know of a 3rd team thats been playing friendlies with a ECNL national champion a year down and beating them. Those Trapped kids 8 out 17 and the familys on the 3rd team all want the spots on the National champion team.

Its going to be huge mess.... The one thing I can gurantee is those trapped kids wont be talked down into taking second team spots at any club.

Q3/Q4 GA, RL and GA2 players definitely want to give a shot on the NL team. The best NL team will attract the most players. Besides the usual practice before tryout, I think they should host four formal tryouts for better evaluation.
 
I just think it's important to keep in mind that for the overwhelming majority of kids, this will just shuffle teams around a bit, make it a bit harder to see what teams kids belong on, and cause some headaches with higher-level teams and scheduling, but otherwise will be a non-impactful change for most kids. It's really only the top-end of competitive leagues and teams where it's going to make any potential real difference with kids being shuffled around; the other 98% of kids playing won't notice much (aside from some current teammates and friends playing on other teams now).

I figure kids below ECNL probably won't be impacted much at all (aide from maybe some individual play time and/or parents being upset). In my son's club, for example, their NPL team is planning on staying composed as-is, and just playing up a year in the SY leagues and competitions. It's not like that makes any real difference, as long as you find a bracket which is competitive; these are not kids vying for starting roles on the "real" MLSN teams or anything, and HS soccer will probably be more impactful for their college potential soon anyway. My 2c, anyway.
You also have to keep in mind that a BY or SY team players playing up in the other league are only playing against players potentially 6 months older and many will be the same age.

When you play up a level in a single league you're playing against players potentially 12 moths older and everyone is guaranteed to be older. (Unless they're playing up to)
 
Q3/Q4 GA, RL and GA2 players definitely want to give a shot on the NL team. The best NL team will attract the most players. Besides the usual practice before tryout, I think they should host four formal tryouts for better evaluation.
That's quite a generalization.

On the girls side since all leagues are switching to SY. Players will funnel to the top clubs/teams independent of league.
 
Get Ready for big changes so ALL kids can play the great game😇

View attachment 31936View attachment 31937
What changes?

The only group I see thats trying to make Soccer free/affordable in America is MLS with homegrown teams. Even then it's only going to kind of work because MLS is structured like NFL where clubs are basically owned by the league. If clubs were independent of the league they'd be free to develop and excell in whatever way brought the best results.
 
What changes?

The only group I see thats trying to make Soccer free/affordable in America is MLS with homegrown teams. Even then it's only going to kind of work because MLS is structured like NFL where clubs are basically owned by the league. If clubs were independent of the league they'd be free to develop and excell in whatever way brought the best results.
"Pay to play is killing US Soccer." I watched it firsthand how daddy pays more than the other daddy and then the rich dad's kid becomes elite. SDFC now has free soccer for the best of the best plus free housing. In fact, everything if gratis bro. The rest can pay for travel ball and pay elite coaches letting mommy & daddy know their child is elite status. $20K a year to be elite. Also, make sure you score high on the SAT, and you better best have 4.4+ GPA to insure elite and Unicorn statues.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top