Fires of 2025

[crush]

P.S. I'm not trying to pick on NoCal but this weird AI sex stuff started up in San Francisco and Silicon Valley, you know, No Cal. Many new fetishes are born in that area. Where did Drag Queen story time start? We had weird shit in SoCal as well. Weird Science Computer nerds like Billy boy make this AI garbage. It's all fake shit just like his fake meat and his fucking evil jabs. I told all of you that the wierdos up at the top of this organized crime planet we were all born into is into some sick shit. No one believed me but now many are waking up. This is not just about politics. This is about waking up the soul in the body. Yes folks, we are eternal souls living in our bodies and families assigned to us this live time. My adopted mother told me we had past lives. I didn't believe her and I'm still not sure but I'm starting to lean that maybe this amazing Angel that saved my life from sick fucks was right after all.

Check this out you guys. If I ever get to see my past lives, I better see William Wallace or else

 

[watfly]

You haven't used ChatGPT either much or recently. Just ask it to site sources. It's really good.

If you want to confirm your thoughts on it -- just ask it. It will surprise you. Most of you are wrong on much of what you say here (at least politically) and I mean this on both sides. ChatGPT makes it infinitely easier now than ever to "do the research".

While I don't put 100% of my weight into the responses, it has gotten a ton better since it's original launch and more often than not it's actually pretty spot on. Again, this is a source of information that is absolutely 100% better than rage based mainstream media or the shitstorm that social media is.

A great example, ask ChatGPT this question "What would be the side effects of raising the federal minimum wage? When we've raised federal minimum wage in the past did any of those negative side effects happen?" Afterwards, ask it to site sources.

Maybe I'm too cheap to pay for ChatGPT, so I don't see the sourcing.

I just asked if Newsom is a fiscally responsible Governor? It was charitable to say the least, and blatantly wrong on Covid being a cause of the deficits. So no thank you on ChatGPT being a reliable source. If you want reliable print and online news I'd suggest the Wall Street Journal, and if you want cable news that presents both sides I'd suggest NewsNation. This is just the tip of the iceberg that I look at for news and I try to rely on multiple sources and first hand accounts (but zero social media), although sometimes I'm lazy and go with a good story if it confirms my bias. Just like your ChatGPT response confirmed your bias.

'That’s Just Common Sense'. USC researchers find bias in up to 38.6% of 'facts' used by AI - USC Viterbi | School of Engineering

A team of researchers from the USC Information Sciences Institute studied two AI databases to see if their data was fair. They found that it wasn’t.

viterbischool.usc.edu

The politics of AI: ChatGPT and political bias

When asked to indicate support or lack of support for a variety of political statements, ChatGPT's responses tend to replicate a liberal point of view, albeit with logical inconsistencies, emblematizing the issue of bias embedded in AI systems through their datasets and human trainers.

www.brookings.edu

"Using this framework, for certain combinations of issues and prompts, in our experiments ChatGPT provided consistent—and often left-leaning—answers on political/social issues."

 

[Slobodan]

You haven't used ChatGPT either much or recently. Just ask it to site sources. It's really good.

If you want to confirm your thoughts on it -- just ask it. It will surprise you. Most of you are wrong on much of what you say here (at least politically) and I mean this on both sides. ChatGPT makes it infinitely easier now than ever to "do the research".

While I don't put 100% of my weight into the responses, it has gotten a ton better since it's original launch and more often than not it's actually pretty spot on. Again, this is a source of information that is absolutely 100% better than rage based mainstream media or the shitstorm that social media is.

A great example, ask ChatGPT this question "What would be the side effects of raising the federal minimum wage? When we've raised federal minimum wage in the past did any of those negative side effects happen?" Afterwards, ask it to site sources.

AI Overview
Learn more

ChatGPT uses a variety of sources to learn about the world, including books, news articles, and social media. ChatGPT is an AI language model that uses deep learning to generate human-like text.

Wow... news articles and social media. Yeah... I can see why most of us are wrong on political opinions. We don't follow news or twitter enough.

 

[kickingandscreaming]

Maybe I'm too cheap to pay for ChatGPT, so I don't see the sourcing.

I just asked if Newsom is a fiscally responsible Governor? It was charitable to say the least, and blatantly wrong on Covid being a cause of the deficits. So no thank you on ChatGPT being a reliable source. If you want reliable print and online news I'd suggest the Wall Street Journal, and if you want cable news that presents both sides I'd suggest NewsNation. This is just the tip of the iceberg that I look at for news and I try to rely on multiple sources and first hand accounts (but zero social media), although sometimes I'm lazy and go with a good story if it confirms my bias. Just like your ChatGPT response confirmed your bias.

'That’s Just Common Sense'. USC researchers find bias in up to 38.6% of 'facts' used by AI - USC Viterbi | School of Engineering

A team of researchers from the USC Information Sciences Institute studied two AI databases to see if their data was fair. They found that it wasn’t.

viterbischool.usc.edu

The politics of AI: ChatGPT and political bias

When asked to indicate support or lack of support for a variety of political statements, ChatGPT's responses tend to replicate a liberal point of view, albeit with logical inconsistencies, emblematizing the issue of bias embedded in AI systems through their datasets and human trainers.

www.brookings.edu

"Using this framework, for certain combinations of issues and prompts, in our experiments ChatGPT provided consistent—and often left-leaning—answers on political/social issues."

As with previously meaningful words such as "liberal" and "progressive", the left has degraded the meaning so much that even those who used to identify as such avoid the label. One of their latest soiled words is "expert". The left has started the process of moving on by replacing "expert" with "ChatGPT". It's a simple substitution for simple minds.

 

[Hüsker Dü]

Being 5 minutes away from the Hurst fire and 20 mins away from the other ones, I can tell you all that this was not caused by global warming or power transmission lines falling lol. DWP and Edison can shut off power in areas of danger whenever they want or feel the need for. In fact 95% of all fires that start in CA are due to Arson. There are numerous videos surfacing online of Arson being the cause of the fire and the Santa Ana winds are there to help them spread. Homeless people and other trouble makers are most likely the cause... Empty reservoirs and empty fire hydrants. We need to take a closer look at our elected leaders in charge of making all these decisions related to fire prevention and maintenance. But I guarantee you if 1 fire was started naturally the rest were arson. Multiple fires in the past couple days were started in the SFV area that have been quickly extinguished before getting out of control.

The information I heard from a local source in the Palisades fire was that the original New Years Eve fire was started by local teenagers with good connections. So once that fire was subdued the hush-hush was laid down. Then the winds reignited a hidden hot spot. We may still learn the identity of the power adjacent youths.
Maybe just local hubbub, but that fire did start in a known “party” spot.

 

[crush]

The information I heard from a local source in the Palisades fire was that the original New Years Eve fire was started by local teenagers with good connections. So once that fire was subdued the hush-hush was laid down. Then the winds reignited a hidden hot spot. We may still learn the identity of the power adjacent youths.
Maybe just local hubbub, but that fire did start in a known “party” spot.

Please give us your "local source" so the forum community can give you acuate notes. Right now, it's just what Husker Du's local source and 99% of your sources over the last 7 years has been horse shit. The information you get from your locals is shit du du is what I mean. I mean really, you're going to come in here and not give your news source. Pony up the sauce or shut the fuck up with your nonsense. Blame it on the local teenagers is fuckin horrible you asshate, what a total dick head you have become. Blames it on the locals. This is the same guy that said the kids that go missing are runaways.

 

[NorCalDad]

Maybe I'm too cheap to pay for ChatGPT, so I don't see the sourcing.

I just asked if Newsom is a fiscally responsible Governor? It was charitable to say the least, and blatantly wrong on Covid being a cause of the deficits. So no thank you on ChatGPT being a reliable source. If you want reliable print and online news I'd suggest the Wall Street Journal, and if you want cable news that presents both sides I'd suggest NewsNation. This is just the tip of the iceberg that I look at for news and I try to rely on multiple sources and first hand accounts (but zero social media), although sometimes I'm lazy and go with a good story if it confirms my bias. Just like your ChatGPT response confirmed your bias.

'That’s Just Common Sense'. USC researchers find bias in up to 38.6% of 'facts' used by AI - USC Viterbi | School of Engineering

A team of researchers from the USC Information Sciences Institute studied two AI databases to see if their data was fair. They found that it wasn’t.

viterbischool.usc.edu

The politics of AI: ChatGPT and political bias

When asked to indicate support or lack of support for a variety of political statements, ChatGPT's responses tend to replicate a liberal point of view, albeit with logical inconsistencies, emblematizing the issue of bias embedded in AI systems through their datasets and human trainers.

www.brookings.edu

"Using this framework, for certain combinations of issues and prompts, in our experiments ChatGPT provided consistent—and often left-leaning—answers on political/social issues."

You didn't like ChatGPTs response? It didn't parallel your own narrative? Ahhh it must be crap then!

To be clear, many of the folks that post in The Kitchen have opinions based on inaccurate/missing data or just wholesale misinformation. Like most things in life, there's nuance to everything. ChatGPT does an excellent job extracting the nuance. But yeah, this is why The Kitchen exists. By all means....continue the berating of one another and savor the misinformation.

 

[crush]

This meme post is not from one of the locals in LA or crush, but from a consumer watch dog group (see below for my sauce). I'm still hurt by watty saying that most of my posts are untruths. Dude, if you publicly say, "crush is right most of the time and means well and is 100% for America and saving all kids, then we can start the healing process with this group. I forgive everyone because I forgive myself first.

 

[crush]

The Kitchen have opinions based on inaccurate/missing data or just wholesale misinformation.

How many jabs and boosters did you take NoCalDad? Be honest with the community bro.

 

[espola]

The information I heard from a local source in the Palisades fire was that the original New Years Eve fire was started by local teenagers with good connections. So once that fire was subdued the hush-hush was laid down. Then the winds reignited a hidden hot spot. We may still learn the identity of the power adjacent youths.
Maybe just local hubbub, but that fire did start in a known “party” spot.

Fireworks?

 

[Hüsker Dü]

Fireworks?

On New Years Eve . . . or something ones lights up.

 

[watfly]

You didn't like ChatGPTs response? It didn't parallel your own narrative? Ahhh it must be crap then!

To be clear, many of the folks that post in The Kitchen have opinions based on inaccurate/missing data or just wholesale misinformation. Like most things in life, there's nuance to everything. ChatGPT does an excellent job extracting the nuance. But yeah, this is why The Kitchen exists. By all means....continue the berating of one another and savor the misinformation.

No, it made false claims about reasons for the deficit. Also I'm a "proof is in the pudding" person. California went from huge surplus to huge deficit under his leadership. You want to "nuance" the shit out of something, aka rationalize, things that are blatantly obvious to everyone else. It's actually comical that you rely on ChatGPT for news. That's only slightly better than relying on social media, or possibly the same thing.

Just FYI the Cato Institute (a libertarian organization) gave Newsom a D on fiscal policy and US News and World Report (a left leaning publication) ranked California 42 of 50 states in fiscal responsibility.

 

[watfly]

The information I heard from a local source in the Palisades fire was that the original New Years Eve fire was started by local teenagers with good connections. So once that fire was subdued the hush-hush was laid down. Then the winds reignited a hidden hot spot. We may still learn the identity of the power adjacent youths.
Maybe just local hubbub, but that fire did start in a known “party” spot.

I've seen a number of reports on this theory. And I've heard a variety of opinions from fire "experts" of the plausibility of this happening. Apparently roots can smolder for a while. I wouldn't dismiss it as a cause.

 

[crush]

Fireworks?

Fire Marshall Bill says you and Husker Du are full of shit with your local source of lies, saying local teens playing with fireworks started all this chaos. Back up your false news loser or stop posting bullshit. My wife's cousin lost her house in these fires. This is not the place to start your lies, trust me. Back up the claims that local Alta Dena teens started the fire, and I will look into what my cousin and her husband have to say about two dudes busted with blow torches. Military aged men not from ou country and certainly not local teens in the rea walking around with blow torches. Keep it up losers.

 

[crush]

No, it made false claims about reasons for the deficit. Also I'm a "proof is in the pudding" person. California went from huge surplus to huge deficit under his leadership. You want to "nuance" the shit out of something, aka rationalize, things that are blatantly obvious to everyone else. It's actually comical that you rely on ChatGPT for news. That's only slightly better than relying on social media, or possibly the same thing.

Just FYI the Cato Institute (a libertarian organization) gave Newsom a D on fiscal policy and US News and World Report (a left leaning publication) ranked California 42 of 50 states in fiscal responsibility.

News with crush is full of crush's truths. I'm not here to tell you what to believe. I'm all about showing you with meme's and emotion to detail. Buckle up watty and get ready for so much news on the Pedo front your head will almost spin off.

 

[Slobodan]

The information I heard from a local source in the Palisades fire was that the original New Years Eve fire was started by local teenagers with good connections. So once that fire was subdued the hush-hush was laid down. Then the winds reignited a hidden hot spot. We may still learn the identity of the power adjacent youths.
Maybe just local hubbub, but that fire did start in a known “party” spot.

Chat GPT told me global warming doesn't affect party spots so we can rule that out this time.

Oh wait, I'm posting in "The Kitchen". Probably wrong.

 

[kickingandscreaming]

I've seen a number of reports on this theory. And I've heard a variety of opinions from fire "experts" of the plausibility of this happening. Apparently roots can smolder for a while. I wouldn't dismiss it as a cause.

I’m pretty sure it was the bats at the dry market. Fires don’t come from a wet market.

 

[espola]

No, it made false claims about reasons for the deficit. Also I'm a "proof is in the pudding" person. California went from huge surplus to huge deficit under his leadership. You want to "nuance" the shit out of something, aka rationalize, things that are blatantly obvious to everyone else. It's actually comical that you rely on ChatGPT for news. That's only slightly better than relying on social media, or possibly the same thing.

Just FYI the Cato Institute (a libertarian organization) gave Newsom a D on fiscal policy and US News and World Report (a left leaning publication) ranked California 42 of 50 states in fiscal responsibility.

The Cato Institute preaches the philosophy of Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum (Ayn Rand, the "Mark Twain" of Objectivism). A strict adherent should be opposed to unnecessary expenses such as public wildfire control -- let every man defend his own property.

 

[espola]

On New Years Eve . . . or something ones lights up.

That may be it -- you have to be 21 to buy edibles, right?

 

[espola]

I've seen a number of reports on this theory. And I've heard a variety of opinions from fire "experts" of the plausibility of this happening. Apparently roots can smolder for a while. I wouldn't dismiss it as a cause.

Roots, fence posts, cow pies -- and then a strong wind. It's like the Boy Scouts all over again.