@Canyon90,
I don't think he's upsetting people, in as much providing some entertainment. We has a passionate father who wants his daughter to "have her cake and eat it too." Many of us see this guy spiraling out of control using ALL CAPS different colored fonts and its kinda funny. Most of us agree that the Girls DA should not restrict HS play, but allow it because 99.934% of those girls in the system won't actually make the YNT (it could be 99.943%).
What he and many other don't appreciate is that US Soccer formed the Girls DA 10 years after the Boys DA in response to litigation threats and "unequal treatment" of female soccer players. If US Soccer adopted different rules for the girls DA it exposes itself to allegations of unequal treatment (once again, defeating one of the purposes of the Girls DA). In addition, the Boys DA will get their shorts in a bunch and want the rules changed, but again (99.12%) of Boys DA players will never sniff the YNT.
Its not corruption as alleged, but practicalities of having a program designed to develop and identify elite athletes. Is it ultimately necessary to eliminate HS play? Yes, if the goal is to have a 10 month league season with 4 practices per week. Because different HS regions play at different times of the year (Fall, Winter, Spring) it is also necessary to eliminate HS because we would have multiple regions just go dark for a few months waiting out HS or struggling to field a team during the season. In California the North HS season is in the fall, in So Cal its in Winter and back east in Fall and Spring.