Cal Berkeley Coach (women) abusive

[MacDre]

Growth mindset, you can always learn and develop. I will be guiding my daughter to a program that teaches cause they exist and are the good ones. You need to read Tony D’s book also if you think the Jeweler is a good coach. Also riddle me this Batman, why can’t he get out of the first round?

Catch Them Being Good: Everything You Need to Know to Successfully Coach Girls: Dicicco, Tony, Hacker, Colleen, Salzberg, Charles: 9780142003350: Amazon.com: Books

Catch Them Being Good: Everything You Need to Know to Successfully Coach Girls [Dicicco, Tony, Hacker, Colleen, Salzberg, Charles] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Catch Them Being Good: Everything You Need to Know to Successfully Coach Girls

www.amazon.com

I don’t know why he can’t get out of the first round and I think it could be a problem for him if this is one of the factors the AD uses to evaluate him.

My kid won’t be playing for the Jeweler. Franky Oviedo, recently took over as the girls coach at Club Tijuana; his daughter is on the team and Xolo’s are committed to winning a world championship. I’ve lost track of all of the black players Xolo’s have brought in the last 10 months to work with my kid. She’ll get to travel with U17’s and the first team. Hopefully debut with first team by 15.

Your kid is lucky that you are so well informed.

 

[EOTL]

How many years has he been at Cal? How many players have been in the program, total please. Fourteen, thirteen years? How many players on the team each year? Twenty-five to thirty? Eight or nine graduating, same coming in each year. So, roughly 325 players if you go with the low number of 25 and thirteen years. Round down to 300 if you want, so 24 players say negative things on a spectrum of seriousness 3-8 on a 10 point scale. So interesting. Certainly a lot to consider.

Really there are only about five who have complained. A local Fox news tv affiliate “journalist” claims the rest are mystery people alleging mystery things, but we should take the “journalist’s” word for it. And no, a grown adult claiming she had to run sprints hard once in her life years ago should not be accorded the same anonymity protections that are provided to those alleging actual sex abuse or blowing the whistle on national security issues. There are important reasons to protect the identity of people who were allegedly raped or sexually assaulted, especially if there is a potential impact in their chosen profession. They do not exist here.

The journalist’s behavior does not even remotely approach appropriate journalistic standards. The unnamed individuals do not merit anonymity, which should be reserved only for issues of critical importance AND when there is no other means of providing the information. Here, that is clearly not the case because about five people did come forward.

And even assuming for the sake of argument that they did, the anonymous sources should have been used for background only and any discussion of them should have been limited to support facts - not their opinion that they don’t like the Cal coach or even their opinion that he was “abusive”. If you look at the second article, she does not identify a single person, nor does she identify a single fact. Instead, she mentions only their alleged opinions. If you know anything about responsible journalism, you should know “Don't let sources offer anonymous opinions of others.” https://www.npr.org/about-npr/688745813/special-section-anonymous-sourcing. See also https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/reader-center/how-the-times-uses-anonymous-sources.html. See also https://www.spj.org/ethics-papers-anonymity.asp

It’s a sad state when people are so easily duped by these local Fox affiliate hit pieces. But if we’ve learned anything over the last four years, it is that people are easily manipulated by the Fox way of doing things. If you are one of those who were duped but can’t admit it, please go back to that second article and identify a single alleged act or incident that occurred.

 

[dad4]

So true, but lets start with the U little club coaches in southern California. And yes they are out there. Oh and also the abusive coaches for the olders who belong to a top club in so cal and all the other coaches at other clubs who fall into that category. Families and players suck it up to be on a top team and be recruited to a top D1 school. Start there and then maybe they will choose a college with a professional coach.
'

If your ulittle kid is so amazing that they need to be on a top team, then every coach in the division already knows your kid.

Therefore, you don’t need to suffer a bad coach. Pick a good coach. That team will win and other kids will follow.

If your kid isn’t so amazing that all the coaches already know them, then don’t worry about it.

 

[sdb]

I don’t know why he can’t get out of the first round and I think it could be a problem for him if this is one of the factors the AD uses to evaluate him.

My kid won’t be playing for the Jeweler. Franky Oviedo, recently took over as the girls coach at Club Tijuana; his daughter is on the team and Xolo’s are committed to winning a world championship. I’ve lost track of all of the black players Xolo’s have brought in the last 10 months to work with my kid. She’ll get to travel with U17’s and the first team. Hopefully debut with first team by 15.

Your kid is lucky that you are so well informed.

From everything you've written your kid is doing great and has a bright future. I'd love to see her play sometime.

 

[crush]

Sorry, I didn't word this correctly. Not different players but the equivalent opportunity each year for abuse, each player has four years for the abuse to happen. Tried to edit but time had elapsed.

Pay the $15 and you can edit all day and night. Plus, no more ads, Yay!! I was told by a sage bro that its ok to get angry, just dont sin and go past 3 out of the, 1-10 anger range. A-1 is a slight trigger to full blown swat team trying to take you down, that's like a 9-`10 range of anger and abuse person.

 

[Soccer43]

Based on my personal experience with Cal, I think they have cleaned everything up. I have never made calls for my kid and the only way the Jeweler could know of her network would be by reading this thread. My kid is actually more qualified than I had thought. Thanks for posting.

The audit report just came out in September. Public entities don’t move that fast - things have to be submitted to Board of regents, reviewed at committees, policies established etc.

 

[crush]

“What One Does With The Truth Is More Difficult Than You Think.”

 

[crush]

“I Will Fight For Those Who Cannot Fight For Themselves.”

 

[crush]

 

[crush]

 

[crush]

 

[Keepermom2]

No comparison.

What's the pay? So 83% of former employees didn't claim a hostile work environment?

You obviously missed the point....if universities do not appropriately investigate sexual abuse than why would they investigate emotional abuse! Somebody was stating that universities investigations should be relied upon on as evidence. Obviously that is not the case.

 

[EOTL]

You obviously missed the point....if universities do not appropriately investigate sexual abuse than why would they investigate emotional abuse! Somebody was stating that universities investigations should be relied upon on as evidence. Obviously that is not the case.

Huh? What does sexual abuse have to do with this? Did Cal not properly investigate sexual abuse, or are you just making things up?

 

[Scott m Shurson]

Really there are only about five who have complained. A local Fox news tv affiliate “journalist” claims the rest are mystery people alleging mystery things, but we should take the “journalist’s” word for it. And no, a grown adult claiming she had to run sprints hard once in her life years ago should not be accorded the same anonymity protections that are provided to those alleging actual sex abuse or blowing the whistle on national security issues. There are important reasons to protect the identity of people who were allegedly raped or sexually assaulted, especially if there is a potential impact in their chosen profession. They do not exist here.

The journalist’s behavior does not even remotely approach appropriate journalistic standards. The unnamed individuals do not merit anonymity, which should be reserved only for issues of critical importance AND when there is no other means of providing the information. Here, that is clearly not the case because about five people did come forward.

And even assuming for the sake of argument that they did, the anonymous sources should have been used for background only and any discussion of them should have been limited to support facts - not their opinion that they don’t like the Cal coach or even their opinion that he was “abusive”. If you look at the second article, she does not identify a single person, nor does she identify a single fact. Instead, she mentions only their alleged opinions. If you know anything about responsible journalism, you should know “Don't let sources offer anonymous opinions of others.” https://www.npr.org/about-npr/688745813/special-section-anonymous-sourcing. See also https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/reader-center/how-the-times-uses-anonymous-sources.html. See also https://www.spj.org/ethics-papers-anonymity.asp

It’s a sad state when people are so easily duped by these local Fox affiliate hit pieces. But if we’ve learned anything over the last four years, it is that people are easily manipulated by the Fox way of doing things. If you are one of those who were duped but can’t admit it, please go back to that second article and identify a single alleged act or incident that occurred.

That's funny. In the heat of the election, you had no journalistic standards. You're nothing but a hypocrite with no kids playing soccer.

 

[MacDre]

For those that think there’s development in college, can you reconcile your position with that of the D1 player in minute 3:50-5:20 of this video? Maybe the problem is that folks have unrealistic expectations of what happens in college soccer and not the Jeweler.

 

[LASTMAN14]

Your an idiot. Stop it. Please.

 

[LASTMAN14]

For those that think there’s development in college, can you reconcile your position with that of the D1 player in minute 3:50-5:20 of this video? Maybe the problem is that folks have unrealistic expectations of what happens in college soccer and not the Jeweler.

Did you play college soccer?

 

[MacDre]

Did you play college soccer?

Nope. But the guys in the video did. Do you take issue with what they’re saying? If so, why?

 

[LASTMAN14]

Nope. But the guys in the video did. Do you take issue with what they’re saying? If so, why?

No, I take issue with the fact your kid is not anywhere near college. Didn’t play soccer and pretend to tell us that their is no development in college because you read something or heard it. It’s like saying why go to college if after 15 we don’t learning anything. I listened to the clip and those two are idiots.

 

[crush]

Your an idiot. Stop it. Please.

First words spoken in a year and I'm an idiot? Gee, thanks bro. Follow along. Treat the girls with respect is the moral of the story. That should start when their in the pre-teens and teen years. Mulligans for all Lastman even all the all the dads and coaches. We can all do better. I forgive you for calling me an idiot and what other words go with it ((see below)). My brain is dictionary and I know the deeper meanings of words. So hurtful what you can say to another human bro. Wowza!!!

id·i·ot
Learn to pronounce

noun : Fool, Nincompoop, Dunce, Cretin, Moron, Dope, Chump, Dimwit, Nutwit, Dumbo, Dummy, Dum-Dum, Loon, Jackass, Bonehead, Numbshull, Blockhead, Pinhead, Jerk, Dipstick, Donkey, Twit, Ass, Asshat, Twerp, Schmuck, Bozo, Boob, Turkey, Dumbass, Goofball, Goof, Goofus, Dork, Klutz, Putz, Ding-Dong, Dingbat, Poop, Yo-Yo and Dingleberry

​