CA youth sports

In your wish list, why does “I don’t want to wear a mask” rank equal to “I want 5 days per week of in person school for my child”?

One of these is a minor annoyance. And there are costs such as the mask themselves ( if you are using them properly and buying new ones constantly and to the environment too and to social interaction). The other is a major threat to the long term health of the economy. You have the two as equals.

It reads like a list of things that annoy Grace. That’s different from an actual long term plan for what we should and should not do.
It’s not a minor annoyance. And they don’t help very much. Very little cost/little benefit= not worth it. If you are still scared after getting your vaccine sure wear one.

other than improve vaccines and focus on early treatments (which our pharma industry and health experts have refused to do) there’s not much else to plan. You are still under the illusion we can control this thing particularly over the long term
 
It’s not a minor annoyance. And they don’t help very much. Very little cost/little benefit= not worth it. If you are still scared after getting your vaccine sure wear one.

other than improve vaccines and focus on early treatments (which our pharma industry and health experts have refused to do) there’s not much else to plan. You are still under the illusion we can control this thing particularly over the long term
Other than you and some unqualified internet fools, who says masks are not effective?

The epidemiologists who study masks this put the reduction around 65-85% reduction in transmission. 95% CI in the Lancet meta-analysis.

Your counterargument seems to consist of assertions from Grace and videos from contrarian general practitioners.

Masks are cheap and they work. And we need them if we are going to open schools and offices before we have a vaccine for the S.A. variant.
 
You guys are fooling yourself that there is anything we can do to control this virus. We can’t control flu. We don’t try to control flu despite it being more deadly to kids. I get that you are scared but life isn’t 100% safe and we aren’t going to get there any time soon. Everyone is going to eventually get this thing but with a lower ifr thanks to the vaccines
We haven't stopped air travel between states. If you want the numbers to stay down you cancel all flights for 45 days leaving the state starting November 15th. That alone will see a better result then wearing 25 masks and closing restraunts and small business.

I do agree we can't fully control the virus but we are able to slow it down to allow more vaccinations to happen but come holiday time all bets are off.
 
Other than you and some unqualified internet fools, who says masks are not effective?

The epidemiologists who study masks this put the reduction around 65-85% reduction in transmission. 95% CI in the Lancet meta-analysis.

Your counterargument seems to consist of assertions from Grace and videos from contrarian general practitioners.

Masks are cheap and they work. And we need them if we are going to open schools and offices before we have a vaccine for the S.A. variant.
Then they’ll be another variant and then the flu will surge up again. You aren’t going to get to 100% safe. And masks do have costs: they aren’t free (you should be throwing them away instead of reusing them), harm social interactions, make it harder to breathe and create environmental waste. The proof is around the world that they don’t work: county curves between those implementing mask mandates and those not are near identical and no where around the world has been able to control this. I know you desperately need to cling to the idea we can control things and that you’ll be safe but it’s not realistic
 
We haven't stopped air travel between states. If you want the numbers to stay down you cancel all flights for 45 days leaving the state starting November 15th. That alone will see a better result then wearing 25 masks and closing restraunts and small business.

I do agree we can't fully control the virus but we are able to slow it down to allow more vaccinations to happen but come holiday time all bets are off.
I 100% agree with you- but, at this juncture stopping air travel would start an absolute shit storm. We should have done that earlier when people weren't so lockdown fatigued.
 
Then they’ll be another variant and then the flu will surge up again. You aren’t going to get to 100% safe. And masks do have costs: they aren’t free (you should be throwing them away instead of reusing them), harm social interactions, make it harder to breathe and create environmental waste. The proof is around the world that they don’t work: county curves between those implementing mask mandates and those not are near identical and no where around the world has been able to control this. I know you desperately need to cling to the idea we can control things and that you’ll be safe but it’s not realistic
Yet another Grace assertion that pretends to disprove peer reviewed epidemiology studies?

You write well, but you’re just wrong. People with actual training have studied this, and they disagree.
 
We haven't stopped air travel between states. If you want the numbers to stay down you cancel all flights for 45 days leaving the state starting November 15th. That alone will see a better result then wearing 25 masks and closing restraunts and small business.

I do agree we can't fully control the virus but we are able to slow it down to allow more vaccinations to happen but come holiday time all bets are off.
By accelerating other health and well-being issues. Nonsense!

What is remedy for all the ills brought on by isolation over the holidays?
 
Yet another Grace assertion that pretends to disprove peer reviewed epidemiology studies?

You write well, but you’re just wrong. People with actual training have studied this, and they disagree.
The experts have been wrong about everything, as have people that have been clinging to the belief that we can control this. What’s worse is you guys are constantly goal post moving: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, through the holidays, til elderly vaccinated, til everyone vaccinated, years. It’s enough. Get that you are scared but stop it.
 
Do you want the cross-immunity data on new variants before we triple the infection rates? Or just lose the masks, open the stadiums, and see what happens?

You see, even if you are right that it won’t get better, we can make it worse.....
[/QUOTE]
You appear a bit unhinged. First, you completely miss the timeline Grace gives on opening with your March Madness comment, then you talk about opening stadiums when she mentioned opening offices - after everyone has had the opportunity to get a vaccine. You are also completely ignoring the way you know these things will be implemented in CA - a step at a time. Right now, we can't even get the steps implemented that are completely supported by science - outdoor sports and schools open. All this because "we don't know" what will happen if we open (or we don't know if a particular group will continue to support the party's future re-election efforts). To that I'll counter, we do know what will happen if we don't. More people will lose their jobs, more children and adults will suffer the psychological damage associated with isolation and constant fear of what "can" happen.

In a related question, isn't Florida giving us a 4.5-month head start (and counting) on what things will look like if we open up to their level?
 
But it isn't time for normal.

Some things need to be open. Eg: outdoor recreation.

Others need to be closed. Eg: pro sports stadiums.

The policy question is determining which things are open and which are closed. There will be some of each.

Asking for normal ( everything open ) in a pandemic is simply ridiculous.
Is there any data about college or pro sports that allowed reduced capacity fan attendance causing outbreaks? If the answer is no, then we need to move forward with allowing fans. If they answer is yes, then that's a different story. The SuperBowl had 25K fans (yes, some were vaccinated), fans were allowed at some college and pro football games as well as fall college soccer and some MLS games. There should be plenty of data to pull from. Then there can be an informed decision made.
 
The experts have been wrong about everything, as have people that have been clinging to the belief that we can control this. What’s worse is you guys are constantly goal post moving: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, through the holidays, til elderly vaccinated, til everyone vaccinated, years. It’s enough. Get that you are scared but stop it.
The core of what you just said:

1- experts disagree with Grace.
2- experts are wrong about everything.
3- therefore Grace is right.

Then you return to random ad hominem accusations like "cling" and "scared".

Is that the best you can bring? A general purpose falsehood prover, and some personal attacks?
 
The core of what you just said:

1- experts disagree with Grace.
2- experts are wrong about everything.
3- therefore Grace is right.

Then you return to random ad hominem accusations like "cling" and "scared".

Is that the best you can bring? A general purpose falsehood prover, and some personal attacks?

its not intended at all as an ad hominem but an explanation as towhy you view things the way you do. The other dynamic here is that the is are perfectly content (if not happy) to live this way and can’t comprehend the damage they are doing to the es.

As for track records our side has been basically wrong about the herd immunity thresholds. The lockdowners have been pretty much wrong about everything else. As we’ve discussed before, for a variety of factors, outsiders with a little knowledge and a tendency to be skeptical will outperform the so-called experts when it comes to things like this (or the 08 crash)
 
The
Is there any data about college or pro sports that allowed reduced capacity fan attendance causing outbreaks? If the answer is no, then we need to move forward with allowing fans. If they answer is yes, then that's a different story. The SuperBowl had 25K fans (yes, some were vaccinated), fans were allowed at some college and pro football games as well as fall college soccer and some MLS games. There should be plenty of data to pull from. Then there can be an informed decision made.
It takes time and cooperation to get the stadium evidence you are asking for. If anyone has it, it's probably from the French games last summer.

It might just be an unstudied question. The full capacity, unmasked data was very convincing. It is not clear it was worth anyone's time to test the safety of 25% with partial masks.
 
The

It takes time and cooperation to get the stadium evidence you are asking for. If anyone has it, it's probably from the French games last summer.

It might just be an unstudied question. The full capacity, unmasked data was very convincing. It is not clear it was worth anyone's time to test the safety of 25% with partial masks.
Shouldn't the data from the fall be available by now? It seems like using contact tracing, we should have a good idea of outbreaks within 30 days of an event. Right? And if it's not worth studying at 25% capacity with masks, then it's safe enough to move forward starting with outdoor sports and then moving indoors.
 
In your wish list, why does “I don’t want to wear a mask” rank equal to “I want 5 days per week of in person school for my child”?

One of these is a minor annoyance. The other is a major threat to the long term health of the economy. You have the two as equals.

It reads like a list of things that annoy Grace. That’s different from an actual long term plan for what we should and should not do.
just to be clear, are you saying 5 days of in person learning for kids is a major threat to the long term health of the economy? or not having the kids in school is a major threat to the health of the economy?
 
Yet another Grace assertion that pretends to disprove peer reviewed epidemiology studies?

You write well, but you’re just wrong. People with actual training have studied this, and they disagree.
*People with actual training have studied this, and they often disagree with each other and change their positions.
 
Shouldn't the data from the fall be available by now? It seems like using contact tracing, we should have a good idea of outbreaks within 30 days of an event. Right? And if it's not worth studying at 25% capacity with masks, then it's safe enough to move forward starting with outdoor sports and then moving indoors.
Should be, but isn't. Our contact tracing stinks.

Honestly, why are you worried about pro sports when schools are still closed?
 
just to be clear, are you saying 5 days of in person learning for kids is a major threat to the long term health of the economy? or not having the kids in school is a major threat to the health of the economy?
Closed schools, over time, are a major threat to the long term health of the economy.

Most of the other things are not.
 
My player returned from his scrimmage game with a smile and some video of a nice goal so good for those that can find a way.

I haven't been to any of the games in person for a long time but it's always nice to see the videos and him happy and looking forward to the president days tournaments out of state. Long drive for them but they love road trips so play on and enjoy life.
 
Back
Top