You want to argue as though 500K people dead is the same as zero people dead, because both reflect a 99%+ survival rate.
Not criticizing your position or reasoning, but as a parent of more than one child (relative ages and impact of COVID restrictions in California surely color the opinion), I don’t understand the ‘for the societal good’ tenor of your comments in this thread.
Yes, 500k+ deaths in 2020 was awful. If that repeats due to variants it’s also awful, but to date variants haven’t shown any statistically relevant number of ‘breakthrough’ reinfections when vaccinated or deaths as a result of infection post vaccination.
That said, a year in the life of a child or adolescent lost, damaged, or otherwise (in my opinion) has a larger societal impact than the reduction in the average life expectancy by 1yr due to COVID.
I applaud your desire to reopen schools and outdoor spaces to minimize the impact on our youth, but NPI’s to protect those that should they wish it have access to vaccinations, seems a bit against ‘for the societal good’ from a net benefit point of view.