kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
This surprises NOBODY who has an ounce of common sense. So, is there any chance of lawsuits over this? Newsome ought to at least get the CA taxpayers back their billion dollars he spent on Chinese masks.
This surprises NOBODY who has an ounce of common sense. So, is there any chance of lawsuits over this? Newsome ought to at least get the CA taxpayers back their billion dollars he spent on Chinese masks.
It's straight up criminal that kids aren't back in school. I understood (but didn't agree with) online learning last spring, but the fact the kids didn't return in fall with all the overwhelming evidence supporting it is just political. F%&k the unions.Cal on demographics and COVID deaths:
Demographers put COVID-19 death toll into perspective
With over 170,000 COVID-19 deaths to date, and 1,000 more each day, America's life expectancy may appear to be plummeting. But in estimating the magnitude of the pandemic, demographers have found that COVID-19 is likely to shorten the average US lifespan in 2020 by only about a year.www.sciencedaily.com
When policy and science are aligned, I’ll support actions taken. All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds. Which ‘best world’ expresses your world view will color the conversation... for me, it’s the kids.
The stats have been there from day one regarding younger people.It's straight up criminal that kids aren't back in school. I understood (but didn't agree with) online learning last spring, but the fact the kids didn't return in fall with all the overwhelming evidence supporting it is just political. F%&k the unions.
There was an Independent study done in NYC schools that showed the same......yet in CA, here we are.The news is claiming that England's 2nd lockdown reduced Covid infections by 30%....schools were kept open during that time. Kids risk of infection is actually lower in school than not.
Rumors flying in our local paper that governor intends to announce lockdowns tomorrow
Ha! Maybe he's trying to catch it at the top so he can take credit. It is likely very close - especially in the areas that were hit hard the first wave. Santa Clara county, not so close. Ugh. I think it's going to be a while. @dad4Rumors flying in our local paper that governor intends to announce lockdowns tomorrow
As you said, SCC has a long way to go to get out of purple. I wonder which political morons leaned on the health dept. to open up restaurants.Ha! Maybe he's trying to catch it at the top so he can take credit. It is likely very close - especially in the areas that were hit hard the first wave. Santa Clara county, not so close. Ugh. I think it's going to be a while. @dad4
View attachment 9558
Really?So the El Paso mayor had this to say today.
"“We did a deep dive in our contact tracing for the week of November the 10th through the 16th and found that 55% of the positives were coming from shopping at large retailers, what we’d term as the big box stores,” Margo said. “And those are considered essential under CISA guidelines under homeland security. And we don’t really have- I don’t have any control over any limitations there.”
I think @dad4 thinks bars are the driver though
Now that's some good advice whether in a pandemic or not.but you need a better data source than a politician.
As you said, SCC has a long way to go to get out of purple. I wonder which political morons leaned on the health dept. to open up restaurants.
We will know more in a few days as the Thanksgiving infections start to come in. Maybe people were smart enough to have their meals separately.
Not betting on it. Now they have to choose whether to close retail in December, or risk running out of ICU space.
I've been looking at the upper midwest to try to guess where confirmed infections tops out.While we’re in the bad news thread, since math is a strong point of yours... at the current rate of spread, you can pick a variable for the duration of that spread rate, when do we hit 200,000 test confirmed infections per day. How many days at that rate will it take to achieve heard immunity? How does that compare with the projected timeline for a vaccine to reach widespread access?
Check this link out these 3 links. If you look at the first link, you will see we are actually dropping in new cases/day. We'll see if the drop persists despite the holidays. Also, the rate of spread is almost constantly changing and the level needed for herd immunity is debated - some indicating it's as low as 40% (few believe this is likely) others as high as 70%. As dad states, ND might be our test for it. Reaching herd immunity will be regional. HI will likely get there last, sometime this summer and primarily through vaccination, Florida, Texas, Arizona, and a bunch of the heartland may be pretty close in March if the vaccine progresses as expected.While we’re in the bad news thread, since math is a strong point of yours... at the current rate of spread, you can pick a variable for the duration of that spread rate, when do we hit 200,000 test confirmed infections per day. How many days at that rate will it take to achieve heard immunity? How does that compare with the projected timeline for a vaccine to reach widespread access?
It’s interesting that Europe is following the same pattern too irrespective of state interventions (Switzerland/Sweden v France/spain). There are some anomalies (eg Germany is still at peak, Canada still rising). It may also point that the coronavirus may be following the classic 1-2-3 waves of influenza and other respiratory illnesses. The question then is does the vaccine get things under control before the third wave hits.Check this link out these 3 links. If you look at the first link, you will see we are actually dropping in new cases/day.
At first glance, those still rising when "comparable" neighbors are not had little to no "first wave".It’s interesting that Europe is following the same pattern too irrespective of state interventions (Switzerland/Sweden v France/spain). There are some anomalies (eg Germany is still at peak, Canada still rising). It may also point that the coronavirus may be following the classic 1-2-3 waves of influenza and other respiratory illnesses. The question then is does the vaccine get things under control before the third wave hits.
At first glance, those still rising when "comparable" neighbors are not had little to no "first wave".
The word "wave" appears to be used ambiguously - even among experts. Fauci warned of "wave after wave" of new infections a few days ago and on October 26 he stated that we are still in "an elongated first wave". So, is CA in the 2nd wave or the elongated first wave? What about TX, AZ, and FL? Graphically, those states are in a 2nd wave. Has HI even had a virus "wave"? Maybe he means that some places are just now experiencing their first wave - although some appear to be well into their second wave. I don't know. I believe we have a good shot at missing a wave this spring if the vaccine gets out as they plan in the states that have considerable seroprevalence. Either way, the death rate should drop considerably - all other things being equal - since a significant proportion of the population at high risk will be vaccinated by March according to plan.
One thing that struck me was how quickly some of the states dropped from the peak (ND, SD, etc.) compared to the "first wave" in other states. Maybe that's what the "little/no intervention" curve looks like.