Try a vaccine passport along with your mask mandate, like they do in SF.Los Angeles has topped 4000 cases for the first time since January. Mask mandate working!!!
The combo works better than either one alone.
Try a vaccine passport along with your mask mandate, like they do in SF.Los Angeles has topped 4000 cases for the first time since January. Mask mandate working!!!
See what I'm posting in the vaccine forum. You aren't going to like it. It will scare you.Try a vaccine passport along with your mask mandate, like they do in SF.
The combo works better than either one alone.
Let me guess, some place with good NPI and low case rates in the past is now experiencing an outbreak.See what I'm posting in the vaccine forum. You aren't going to like it. It will scare you.
Nope. This is like really radical outside the box stuff challenging the argument I posted that Gottlieb made and not by an anti-mask freak (and which has the ear of the UK govt). I don't know if it's right, but if it is, Bruddah has made a chump of you and your world and belief will crumble around you....it means everything you thought is wrong. Again, I'm not taking a position here...Gottlieb might be right, but it's shocking even to me.Let me guess, some place with good NPI and low case rates in the past is now experiencing an outbreak.
And Hound can comment that some place with huge past case rates now looks good.
Then we all can feel really clever.
It happens all over. You can see it in the standard 2 variable differential equation for this:
P' = k (1-P-S)(P-S)
S' = c( P-S)
As S goes up, P' goes down. ( When recovered population rises, current infections fall. )
Nope. This is like really radical outside the box stuff challenging the argument I posted that Gottlieb made and not by an anti-mask freak (and which has the ear of the UK govt). I don't know if it's right, but if it is, Bruddah has made a chump of you and your world and belief will crumble around you....it means everything you thought is wrong. Again, I'm not taking a position here...Gottlieb might be right, but it's shocking even to me.
I don't watch the videos people post, including yours.
Like most people, I read much faster than most announcers speak. Watching someone slowly get to their point is excruciating. Then, they repeat themselves, including the same pseudo-dramatic buildup.
If your point isn't important enough to write down, then it isn't important.
p.s. maybe Bruddah will transcript it for you.....because if true it means he's been more right than you.....again not saying it is or isn't right....but if true Bruddah has absolutely rocked your world (though uncomfortably for him, it would require a vaccine mandate for anyone over some age in their 20s who couldn't prove they had COVID before)Ha ha. I knew you'd be scared about it. He does cards so you can flip through the relevant points and read it if you don't want to listen. I won't summarize it (though I did topline it in the vaccine post) because I don't want to mischaracterize it and he has the original (reputable) sources in there if you care to hunt them down and the data is very extensive that I could never do it justice in one post since it encompasses multiple studies. Guess your faith isn't strong enough to test it, or you are frightened about what you may find.
I don't watch the videos people post, including yours.
Like most people, I read much faster than most announcers speak. Watching someone slowly get to their point is excruciating. Then, they repeat themselves, including the same pseudo-dramatic buildup.
If your point isn't important enough to write down, then it isn't important.
Again, with the mischaracterizations. I'm not taking a position and am open to the Gottlieb position as well. I've said either could be right....I need more info. Campbell sort of has taken a position....he also takes a balanced approach, but leans optimistically into this. The fact that HE is covering it means it's not some out there whackado theory because Campbell is very measured. But if the position Campbell summarizes (very well I might add, far better than I could do justice), then everything dad 4 believes in will just be spectacularly, completely, totally wrong.Don't worry about it. She is following her usual behavior with the Campbell videos.. He usually presents a balanced analysis, showing pros and cons of several points. Grace grabs the points she likes and ignores the opposites.
Again, with the mischaracterizations. I'm not taking a position and am open to the Gottlieb position as well. I've said either could be right....I need more info. Campbell sort of has taken a position....he also takes a balanced approach, but leans optimistically into this. The fact that HE is covering it means it's not some out there whackado theory because Campbell is very measured. But if the position Campbell summarizes (very well I might add, far better than I could do justice), then everything dad 4 believes in will just be spectacularly, completely, totally wrong.
It's kind of like living a good life, dying and landing in hell, wondering why you got there, and then being told "the correct answer was Mormon...Mormon was the correct answer"
How? Didn’t they just say that vaccinated people can spread the virus like “chickenpox”?!?!?Try a vaccine passport along with your mask mandate, like they do in SF.
The combo works better than either one alone.
Are you sticking with your position that we should deliberately infect people with the disease?
How? Didn’t they just say that vaccinated people can spread the virus like “chickenpox”?!?!?
Again, mischaracterizing my position. We've crossed from fool to liar now. If we were in the 1800s I'd be taking out my glove to slap you right about now. As I've said before, I don't know who is right: Gottlieb or the info Campbell lays out....I need more info. I am sure, however, that you are a liar, a fool and a troll, all of which is self evident.
I quoted you directly.
No, you didn't. 1. I'm very clear I'm not advocating either position....I need more info, but 2) if the position Campbell outlines is correct, while we don't want to "deliberately" infect people, we do want vaccinated people to be exposed to the disease and we wouldn't want to be doing any NPIs except as necessary to prevent complete hospital collapse.
So yes, you are a liar now.
Here Grace, you this meme for the liar.No, you didn't. 1. I'm very clear I'm not advocating either position....I need more info, but 2) if the position Campbell outlines is correct, while we don't want to "deliberately" infect people, we do want vaccinated people to be exposed to the disease and we wouldn't want to be doing any NPIs except as necessary to prevent complete hospital collapse.
So yes, you are a liar now.
URA100%LIARESPOLAPeople can read the threads and decide for themselves who is lying.
People can read the threads and decide for themselves who is lying.
Yup. But as far as I'm concerned, you are now forever branded a liar in my book and I will forever more remind you of it, liar.