Bruddah IZ
DA
A given is that the next virus is always is always more infectious than the last. You people crack me up.That was the link to the study from the first reply I posted. I assumed clicking the link to the actual study was a given?
A given is that the next virus is always is always more infectious than the last. You people crack me up.That was the link to the study from the first reply I posted. I assumed clicking the link to the actual study was a given?
I did not expect the reporter to get it that wrong.That was the link to the study from the first reply I posted. I assumed clicking the link to the actual study was a given?
So what you’re saying is the only thing you’ve been able to find is one very small case study in Kentucky?That was the link to the study from the first reply I posted. I assumed clicking the link to the actual study was a given?
read the study. that’s not what it’s about.A given is that the next virus is always is always more infectious than the last. You people crack me up.
You beat me to it. I have seen and heard this study misreported by reporters and so-called medical experts. If your hear anyone make a claim about the "Kentucky Study" this is the one they are misqouting.I did not expect the reporter to get it that wrong.
Reporter’s version: “the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a study reporting that individuals who've had COVID are twice as likely to get reinfected.”.
Actual study: Among those previously infected, those who get vaccinated are less likely to get reinfected. “Among Kentucky residents infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020, vaccination status of those reinfected during May–June 2021 was compared with that of residents who were not reinfected. In this case-control study, being unvaccinated was associated with 2.34 times the odds of reinfection compared with being fully vaccinated.”
Link to government study? Before espola ask.
Because the vaccine "appears" to (insert any type of contradictory data here).“Appears”? According to who?
I did not expect the reporter to get it that wrong.
Look dad, based on my 10 friends who got jabbed, all of them have been sick at least once. One of them got blood clot and went to the Dr, not ER. He's on blood thinner btw. The other 9 are just pissed because they got sick again and some twice. That's the rub for most and oh by the way, they have to wear a mask indoors now. Dont you dare try and pin this on the unvaccinated. You have crossed a line. The fact is according to Dr. F, not only can you catch IT again, you also can contaminate others like me. Maybe you should just sit this out. All you do is lie!!!I did not expect the reporter to get it that wrong.
Reporter’s version: “the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a study reporting that individuals who've had COVID are twice as likely to get reinfected.”.
Actual study: Among those previously infected, those who get vaccinated are less likely to get reinfected. “Among Kentucky residents infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020, vaccination status of those reinfected during May–June 2021 was compared with that of residents who were not reinfected. In this case-control study, being unvaccinated was associated with 2.34 times the odds of reinfection compared with being fully vaccinated.”
Oh Lord, the old Good, Better and Best.You beat me to it. I have seen and heard this study misreported by reporters and so-called medical experts. If your hear anyone make a claim about the "Kentucky Study" this is the one they are misqouting.
It seems to me based on the data available today in regards to immunity from infection:
Vaccination=Good
Natural immunity=Better
Natural immunity + vaccination=Best
Look at the confidence interval. The study was large enough.So what you’re saying is the only thing you’ve been able to find is one very small case study in Kentucky?
Unfortunately most mainstream reporters know very little about the topic they're reporting. They've been trained in journalism (which is debatable) and not the science, medical, financial, legal fields that they're reporting.It's an unfortunate aspect of contemporary media that feeds into the mis/disinformation. There is good science reporting, but more and more it is not the stuff that's just going to show up in the feed of your standard media outlet.
In addition to the booster shot, mask, and lockdowns. Like I said you people crack me up.read the study. that’s not what it’s about.
The study is evaluating whether there is any point in vaccinating someone who has some natural immunity. result was a clear yes.
Shots Bruddah, not shot. I hear this is a never ending war on humanity type of war. The last rumor I heard was that their are a few Red Haired Giants in the Kandahar Mountains. My old sales rep Ahmad told me about this Giant of a Legend and he say's it's true 100%. I laughed back then but not now. These giants are like 15-20 feet tall and are protecting all the precious stones, gold and precious metals in Kandahar. The Giants dont give a shit about the heroine. Their hooked on the Gold and have been for some time and were hooked on opium.In addition to the booster shot, mask, and lockdowns. Like I said you people crack me up.
Pretty thin. And of course they had to spend quite a bit of time on the many fallacies that prop up the argument for inequality. I've read better on their nursing/homecare challenges.I knew about it from contemporary standard click journalism about Dec last year (Reuters, BBC I think). For the actual report I can't find anything other than the pdf in Swedish (http://www.sou.gov.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/SOU_2020_80_Äldreomsorgen-under-pandemin_webb.pdf) which prob not much help. Here is a no paywall retrospective that touches on what I understand to be the main issues that were identified, related to protection for elderly in nursing homes, which bore the brunt of Sweden's first COVID wave (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0020731421994848).
Pretty thin. And of course they had to spend quite a bit of time on the many fallacies that prop up the argument for inequality. I've read better on their nursing/homecare challenges.
This ain’t a job nor a hobby. So are we saying 2.34 times more chance doesn’t mean 2.34 times more as more than double? What am I missing there?So what you’re saying is the only thing you’ve been able to find is one very small case study in Kentucky?
Morbid facts are hardly a jump up and down event. But YOUR counterfactual thinking is based on what previous event that mandated lockdowns and other denial of due process rights?You can have your opinion. I can have my opinion. Whatever. Bottom line. Sweden had a big up front mortality hit, particularly relative to other Scandinavian countries. The government thought the comps were bad and it wasn't such a good look. If there's a segment of the twitterati out there that wants to jump up and down about Sweden being such a great success story....yada, yada, yada, freedom, that's got to be put on the scales as well. And like I said there's is a valid argument for paying the penalty up front. But that doesn't mean there's not a penalty. And just because it happened more than two weeks ago doesn't mean it's not true.
This ain’t a job nor a hobby. So are we saying 2.34 times more chance doesn’t mean 2.34 times more as more than double? What am I missing there?