Bad News Thread

Seems rather open to interpretation since it goes back and forth depending on which party is in power (ie DOJ opinion)

But what you are advocating and what the dems are advocating is fishing expeditions.

What you want is the ability to pull taxes to see if you can find a crime. That is not the way we do things. This what authoritarian regimes and banana republics do.

The precedent you want is that political parties can without evidence of a crime go after their political opponents by digging around personal information.

That is not a good thing for this country. That if allowed allows increased partisanship and division.
 
Seems rather open to interpretation since it goes back and forth depending on which party is in power (ie DOJ opinion)

But what you are advocating and what the dems are advocating is fishing expeditions.

What you want is the ability to pull taxes to see if you can find a crime. That is not the way we do things. This what authoritarian regimes and banana republics do.

The precedent you want is that political parties can without evidence of a crime go after their political opponents by digging around personal information.

That is not a good thing for this country. That if allowed allows increased partisanship and division.

What does any of that have to do with your obvious encouragement of crime?
 
What does any of that have to do with your obvious encouragement of crime?
Evade a crime?

What crime did he commit?

What the dems want is the ability to dig through personal information to see if they can FIND a crime.

That is what you are advocating for.

Kind of sad that people get so partisan that they toss out norms to get what they HOPE will help them out politically.
 
Evade a crime?

What crime did he commit?

What the dems want is the ability to dig through personal information to see if they can FIND a crime.

That is what you are advocating for.

Kind of sad that people get so partisan that they toss out norms to get what they HOPE will help them out politically.

You didn't answer the question.
 
Hey brainless one.

The largest group of people not vaxxed are reliable D voters.

Putting that aside.

Covid is not particularly dangerous to the vast majority of the population. That is a fact.

So those not getting it are entirely rationale in their thinking.

The group at risk? They have been vaxxed at a very high rate.

What has been the result?

Deaths have fallen dramatically.

Stop living in fear. You can stop worry about covid at this point.
You might want to redo your analysis of the 30-49 demographic. Age 18-49 is now about half of new covid hospital admissions. You can bet it’s the older end of it.

Some of that is the difference in vax rates. But not all of it. We still have 10% non-vaccinated for over 65. By the numbers for original covid, that 10% should completely dominate. And it isn’t.

It also doesn’t explain how you get 25,000 people under 50 and currently hospitalized with covid. We didn’t have that during the winter surge.

The simplest explanation is that Delta is significantly riskier for 30-49 than original covid.
 
See there is your trolling again.

You want to see Trumps tax returns so the dems can dig.

What crime did he commit? Outside of fishing around, what is the legal reason? Trick question. It is partisan politics.

What does that have to do with your encouragement of a federal crime?
 
You might want to redo your analysis of the 30-49 demographic. Age 18-49 is now about half of new covid hospital admissions. You can bet it’s the older end of it.

Some of that is the difference in vax rates. But not all of it. We still have 10% non-vaccinated for over 65. By the numbers for original covid, that 10% should completely dominate. And it isn’t.

It also doesn’t explain how you get 25,000 people under 50 and currently hospitalized with covid. We didn’t have that during the winter surge.

The simplest explanation is that Delta is significantly riskier for 30-49 than original covid.
Dad, honest question. You know baby crush life story. You know Big Crush is a no for jabs. My chance of making a living to feed my family went from slim to zipo with the new information I just received for folks like me. Do you think i should be forced to take the jabs to buy and sell or should I have a special free pass that allows me to skip the experiment?
 
You might want to redo your analysis of the 30-49 demographic. Age 18-49 is now about half of new covid hospital admissions. You can bet it’s the older end of it.

Some of that is the difference in vax rates. But not all of it. We still have 10% non-vaccinated for over 65. By the numbers for original covid, that 10% should completely dominate. And it isn’t.

It also doesn’t explain how you get 25,000 people under 50 and currently hospitalized with covid. We didn’t have that during the winter surge.

The simplest explanation is that Delta is significantly riskier for 30-49 than original covid.

If I were a religious man, I would be praying that a new variant that targets children does not evolve in the swamp of the voluntarily unvaccinated.
 
You might want to redo your analysis of the 30-49 demographic. Age 18-49 is now about half of new covid hospital admissions. You can bet it’s the older end of it.

Some of that is the difference in vax rates. But not all of it. We still have 10% non-vaccinated for over 65. By the numbers for original covid, that 10% should completely dominate. And it isn’t.

It also doesn’t explain how you get 25,000 people under 50 and currently hospitalized with covid. We didn’t have that during the winter surge.

The simplest explanation is that Delta is significantly riskier for 30-49 than original covid.
Lol! What new virus hasn't been riskier than the last? I'm sure your numbers are being hyped when we look at IFR.
 
The simplest explanation is that Delta is significantly riskier for 30-49 than original covid.
That stats from the countries that have already experienced the wave and are done with it...clearly show delta is NOT an issue. Deaths barely moved.

To pretend otherwise is...well just pretending.

We don't need to wonder what will happen with Delta spreading through the population. We can already look at a number of countries in the west. They neither had an issue with a rise in deaths NOR had to dealt with their hospital systems coming anywhere CLOSE to having issues.

Look at the data.

"Coronavirus: While Delta infections in UK continue to be high and rising, there has not been a corresponding rise in the number of hospitalisations, study said."


The Reassuring Data on the Delta Variant
There’s no sign of a surge in hospitalization or severe illness, and the vaccines remain extremely effective


"Surprise dip in UK COVID cases baffles researchers
Daily recorded infections have more than halved since mid-July. Few researchers anticipated such a sharp decline, and they are now struggling to interpret it."

---Same article states this. Sound familiar?

"Exponential growth in infections since June led to predictions of as many as 100,000 new cases being reported daily, and fears that the National Health Service (NHS) could be overwhelmed by hospitalizations."

But that didn't happen...and per the article: "Few public-health experts, however, anticipated the recent sharp drop — and they are struggling to interpret it.

 
That stats from the countries that have already experienced the wave and are done with it...clearly show delta is NOT an issue. Deaths barely moved.

To pretend otherwise is...well just pretending.

We don't need to wonder what will happen with Delta spreading through the population. We can already look at a number of countries in the west. They neither had an issue with a rise in deaths NOR had to dealt with their hospital systems coming anywhere CLOSE to having issues.

Look at the data.

"Coronavirus: While Delta infections in UK continue to be high and rising, there has not been a corresponding rise in the number of hospitalisations, study said."


The Reassuring Data on the Delta Variant
There’s no sign of a surge in hospitalization or severe illness, and the vaccines remain extremely effective


"Surprise dip in UK COVID cases baffles researchers
Daily recorded infections have more than halved since mid-July. Few researchers anticipated such a sharp decline, and they are now struggling to interpret it."

---Same article states this. Sound familiar?

"Exponential growth in infections since June led to predictions of as many as 100,000 new cases being reported daily, and fears that the National Health Service (NHS) could be overwhelmed by hospitalizations."

But that didn't happen...and per the article: "Few public-health experts, however, anticipated the recent sharp drop — and they are struggling to interpret it.

Japan's current IFR is .0008 and .015 since Feb 2020.
 
Dad, honest question. You know baby crush life story. You know Big Crush is a no for jabs. My chance of making a living to feed my family went from slim to zipo with the new information I just received for folks like me. Do you think i should be forced to take the jabs to buy and sell or should I have a special free pass that allows me to skip the experiment?
No free pass. Some jobs and recreations involve higher risk, and people in those jobs and recreations need to be vaccinated.

So, if your job is in person sales, you need to be vaccinated. Just too much risk to other people if you don’t.

I have no idea if your employer can give you a telephone desk job until the time if/when it calms down. Sounds like you asked and they said no.

There are no baby parts in the jab. Best description is they have some vials of stem cells, and they gave the jab to some of those vials.

Researchers are developing stem cell lines so we can stop using the stem cell lines that came from those two abortions. So, it may not be an issue 15 years from now. They just aren’t there yet.
 
And the left still think the NY Times and others are str8 shooters and Fox is the only biased source out there.

Unfortunately the Times and others also have an agenda to sell or in this case HIDE.


"A top editor at the New York Times instructed Times staffers not to investigate the origins of COVID-19, two Times employees confirmed today.
'In early 2020,' a veteran Times employee tells me, 'I suggested to a senior editor at the paper that we investigate the origins of COVID-19. I was told it was dangerous to run a piece about the origins of the coronavirus. There was resistance to running anything that could suggest that [COVID-19 was manmade or had leaked accidentally from a lab].'"

"In November 2019, it emerged that China Daily had failed to disclose to federal authorities millions of dollars in payments to US outlets including the Times and the Washington Post. In August 2020, the Times quietly scrubbed the China-funded advertorials from its website. Still, in October 2020, the Times ran an op-ed by Regina Ip, a member of Hong Kong's Executive Council, justifying the repression of anti-government protests in the Hong Kong SAR."


"As someone who has spent years researching the history of the Times, I was struck by the paper's markedly pro-China bent at the start of the pandemic. It opposed Trump's travel ban to and from China as "isolationist". It all but ignored the unparalleled success of China's arch-enemy, Taiwan, in containing the virus. It downplayed China's economic war against Australia, whose prime minister early on questioned the CCP story on the pandemic's origins. And it celebrated China's success in battling Covid-19, taking the CCP's absurd mortality numbers at face value, reporting in August 2020 that 4,634 Chinese people died from the virus and, six months later, that there were 4,636 total deaths. That in a country of 1.4 billion people only two people died of Covid-19 in the half a year defies logic and common sense. Still, the Times legitimised the CCP numbers by printing them as hard fact."

"The Times, which used Daszak as a key source in over a dozen articles, has never mentioned that Daszak's organisation funded the Wuhan lab, in particular research into bats and coronaviruses, a flagrant conflict of interest. Crucially, there was no mention of this when a reporter interviewed Daszak this February, following his return from a heavily criticised WHO investigation into the virus's origins. (Danszak later recused himself from the investigation because of the conflict of interest.)


But the Times also never revealed that Daszak was a favoured source for another outlet: China Daily. The state-owned media organisation, along with Xinhua and sister outlet Global Times, repeatedly quoted Daszak to assure readers of China's full cooperation in the search for the virus�s origins -- and to discredit the possibility of a lab leak."

 
No free pass. Some jobs and recreations involve higher risk, and people in those jobs and recreations need to be vaccinated.

So, if your job is in person sales, you need to be vaccinated. Just too much risk to other people if you don’t.

I have no idea if your employer can give you a telephone desk job until the time if/when it calms down. Sounds like you asked and they said no.

There are no baby parts in the jab. Best description is they have some vials of stem cells, and they gave the jab to some of those vials.

Researchers are developing stem cell lines so we can stop using the stem cell lines that came from those two abortions. So, it may not be an issue 15 years from now. They just aren’t there yet.

Only the adeno-based vaccines involve the use of the HEK-293 cell line that would pose issues for some people. The mRNA vaccines are, as far as I'm aware, completely synthetic. They are basically lipid nanoparticles with in vitro transcribed RNA.
 
No free pass. Some jobs and recreations involve higher risk, and people in those jobs and recreations need to be vaccinated.

So, if your job is in person sales, you need to be vaccinated. Just too much risk to other people if you don’t.

I have no idea if your employer can give you a telephone desk job until the time if/when it calms down. Sounds like you asked and they said no.

There are no baby parts in the jab. Best description is they have some vials of stem cells, and they gave the jab to some of those vials.

Researchers are developing stem cell lines so we can stop using the stem cell lines that came from those two abortions. So, it may not be an issue 15 years from now. They just aren’t there yet.

It's a stretch to call them abortions since the original blastocysts never lived in a human placenta.
 
Only the adeno-based vaccines involve the use of the HEK-293 cell line that would pose issues for some people. The mRNA vaccines are, as far as I'm aware, completely synthetic. They are basically lipid nanoparticles with in vitro transcribed RNA.
Would you or dad4 kindly produce the ingredients of the Spike protein that is now in YOUR blood stream? Look, i dont need to go deeply emtional on you non believers about weather or knot fetus tissue from deep in stem is in this batch. Honestly I dont give a fuck at this point. I need someone on this panel to show me wtf you injected in your arms. I see videos of hammers, spoons and phones magnetically atrached to their arm. Tell you what. Im going to think critically for myself and get back to you and Dad4. I 100% have no idea what you took bro. I wont speculate anymore. The souls of the babies are alive and well btw.
 
So this goes into the bad section.

This is increasingly how our gov works. And it shouldn't be like this.

The congress did not pass the extension.

So what happens? A gov agency just did.

That shouldn't happen.


Too big to fail banks getting bailed out again. Time to exchange your mortgage for a HELOC or partial HELOC. Cheap (amortized) money is more expensive then you think.
 
Back
Top