Bad News Thread

Oh, no real luck required. b.1.117 is reasonably likely to make a mess of Florida’s April numbers. It’s been growing exponentially there as vanilla covid declines. If it continues like it has been, FL will see a large spike.

But, even if the data ends up showing my point, it’s still really bad data. I’m not going to use a variant spike to make a policy claim. It’s dishonest.

I get the confirmation bias that would be implicit with justifying policy based on case numbers with regional variant differences... but wouldn’t you find it relevant if there is not divergence given the variants?
 
I get the confirmation bias that would be implicit with justifying policy based on case numbers with regional variant differences... but wouldn’t you find it relevant if there is not divergence given the variants?
With n=3? And 3 different levels of seroprevalence?

No. Not really. If CA has the worst growth, what does it prove? All three states are changing their policies in multiple ways. If CA has a spike, what caused it? Youth soccer just started up. We just opened indoor dining. Schools are opening. And, if CA numbers are good, what does that prove? The weather improved. We have more vaccines distributed. Outdoor sports are open, displacing indoor activities. You can grind any axe you want to with those numbers.

CDC ran a full, county by county regression on this. I’m not going to toss out a regression on 2000 time series data sets because someone wants to pretend to be a data guy with a single snapshot with n=3.
 
Oh, no real luck required. b.1.117 is reasonably likely to make a mess of Florida’s April numbers. It’s been growing exponentially there as vanilla covid declines. If it continues like it has been, FL will see a large spike.
Mai
But, even if the data ends up showing my point, it’s still really bad data. I’m not going to use a variant spike to make a policy claim. It’s dishonest.

There's also something afoot though that can't be fully explained by the variants. Remember in Europe in Scandinavia and Eastern Europe they are hitting new peaks. In the US, states from Maine east of the Appalachians as far south as Virginia have plateaued while Florida is still falling though the rate of decline is still slowing. The only way the variants can fully explain this is if the Northeast has a higher variant proportion than Florida and a new epidemic wave is spreading out of the northeast. Since it started in New York that would make it ground zero in the new variant wave. The other thing to note is that in New York and Massachusetts the cases have been plateaued since the end of January at roughly the same levels, neither accelerating nor decelerating. Maybe the vaccine is acting is a counter to the accelerator or maybe it's the weather. New York, though is out performing Florida right now in vaccination, and neighboring Georgia ranks dead last.....if it was the vaccination alone you'd expect to see irregular pockets of some places doing worse than others than this regional pattern that seems to be spreading out now touching as far south as Viriginia.
 
With n=3? And 3 different levels of seroprevalence?

No. Not really. If CA has the worst growth, what does it prove? All three states are changing their policies in multiple ways. If CA has a spike, what caused it? Youth soccer just started up. We just opened indoor dining. Schools are opening. And, if CA numbers are good, what does that prove? The weather improved. We have more vaccines distributed. Outdoor sports are open, displacing indoor activities. You can grind any axe you want to with those numbers.

CDC ran a full, county by county regression on this. I’m not going to toss out a regression on 2000 time series data sets because someone wants to pretend to be a data guy with a single snapshot with n=3.

I was thinking first of the comparison of TX to FL going forward. Open for business, high previous exposure rates and FL with a growing variant % of cases. If there is no divergence there, I think that tells us something (or at least implies something).

If CA then follows similar trends, with policy differences and a variant of their own, that would imply something significant as well.

It wouldn’t be proof of a point, but it could isolate some variables as relevant or not.
 
There's also something afoot though that can't be fully explained by the variants. Remember in Europe in Scandinavia and Eastern Europe they are hitting new peaks. In the US, states from Maine east of the Appalachians as far south as Virginia have plateaued while Florida is still falling though the rate of decline is still slowing. The only way the variants can fully explain this is if the Northeast has a higher variant proportion than Florida and a new epidemic wave is spreading out of the northeast. Since it started in New York that would make it ground zero in the new variant wave. The other thing to note is that in New York and Massachusetts the cases have been plateaued since the end of January at roughly the same levels, neither accelerating nor decelerating. Maybe the vaccine is acting is a counter to the accelerator or maybe it's the weather. New York, though is out performing Florida right now in vaccination, and neighboring Georgia ranks dead last.....if it was the vaccination alone you'd expect to see irregular pockets of some places doing worse than others than this regional pattern that seems to be spreading out now touching as far south as Viriginia.

I further point out that this is a similar pattern to what we saw last year around the same time, with New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts being ground zero for the initial spring wave that started all this.
 
I wondered when you’d realize you should drop FL from the argument and focus on TX. There is too much risk that b.1.117 will drive up numbers in FL, especially since their vaccinations are lagging. FL may end up the worst of the three states by May 01, but not because of policy differences.

For now, Florida has a little over twice California’s average daily case rate. Texas is at 1.6 times. So, not looking so great.
NY Times indicating there's no sign of any increase in cases in FL where B.1.1.7 is widespread.

But — here’s the second idea — the overall evidence on the variants has been more encouraging so far than many people expected. The vaccines are virtually eliminating hospitalizations and death in people who contract a variant. Reinfection does not seem to be widespread. And even if the variants are more contagious, they have not caused the kind of surges that seemed possible a couple of weeks ago.​
In Florida, where B.1.1.7 has spread widely, “there’s no sign of any increase in cases,” Dr. Eric Topol of Scripps Research wrote.​
 
I haven't heard anything one way or the other to be honest.
I know nothing of what ECNL is doing/trying to do...City of Phoenix is not prioritizing loosening their restrictions on having any events at their facilities.

I haven't heard rumor that they are considering opening anytime soon. It's beyond me why they would continue to keep all of their facilities closed, given the current environment. Impacts are being felt by clubs who use their facilities throughout the city's footprint in the valley.

Hopefully their are conversations being had and the ECNL spring event happens - opens the door for local clubs to regain access.
 
NY Times indicating there's no sign of any increase in cases in FL where B.1.1.7 is widespread.

But — here’s the second idea — the overall evidence on the variants has been more encouraging so far than many people expected. The vaccines are virtually eliminating hospitalizations and death in people who contract a variant. Reinfection does not seem to be widespread. And even if the variants are more contagious, they have not caused the kind of surges that seemed possible a couple of weeks ago.​
In Florida, where B.1.1.7 has spread widely, “there’s no sign of any increase in cases,” Dr. Eric Topol of Scripps Research wrote.​
Why would you expect to see a change to overall cases now?

If b.1.1.7 is small, but growing exponentially, you would not expect to see overall case growth until the growth in b.1.1.7 exceeds the decline in normal cases. Exceeds in absolute value, not in proportionate rates.

The second paragraph is more promising. At least for the UK variant, both vaccines and traditional immunity appear to work. That puts a pretty short time limit on how long the UK variant has to do damage.
 
Why would you expect to see a change to overall cases now?

If b.1.1.7 is small, but growing exponentially, you would not expect to see overall case growth until the growth in b.1.1.7 exceeds the decline in normal cases. Exceeds in absolute value, not in proportionate rates.

The second paragraph is more promising. At least for the UK variant, both vaccines and traditional immunity appear to work. That puts a pretty short time limit on how long the UK variant has to do damage.
Yo, Jimbo (your new nickname - both words - I'll see about getting you a bowling shirt), do you have more qualifications than Dr. Eric Topol? Maybe this is a case of the reporter not understanding what was said. I don't really want to argue, I have a significant other for that. As you say, we'll see in a few weeks. Let's hope.
 
Yo, Jimbo (your new nickname - both words - I'll see about getting you a bowling shirt), do you have more qualifications than Dr. Eric Topol? Maybe this is a case of the reporter not understanding what was said. I don't really want to argue, I have a significant other for that. As you say, we'll see in a few weeks. Let's hope.
I try to be clear that I am a math guy with utterly no qualifications on this.

It does make me uncomfortable when I end up disagreeing with actual experts. They know many things I don't.

Not so much the Topol case: I agree with him that so far you can't see any spike. And he wasn't quite saying whether a FL spike was in the future or not.

But I do keep wondering what Osterholm sees that I am missing. I don't get the numbers behind his hurricane prediction.

- Jimbo

I also have no qualifications for bowling. But I am probably qualified to wear a shirt.
 
How many of you eat out like this? My pal owns a killer Thai place and his customers who want to eat out have to eat in the freaking parking lot. Look at this couple........

1615555337185.png
 
The “take me somewhere expensive“ meme made me think of the price of an overnight ICU stay.

There are problems worse than the indignity of eating your fancy dinner outside.
 
Interesting study. There's an interesting section there too about the impact in Ireland of dining restrictions.

 
Back
Top