Oh, no real luck required. b.1.117 is reasonably likely to make a mess of Florida’s April numbers. It’s been growing exponentially there as vanilla covid declines. If it continues like it has been, FL will see a large spike.
But, even if the data ends up showing my point, it’s still really bad data. I’m not going to use a variant spike to make a policy claim. It’s dishonest.
I get the confirmation bias that would be implicit with justifying policy based on case numbers with regional variant differences... but wouldn’t you find it relevant if there is not divergence given the variants?