Yes you have repeatedly. You are more than welcome to correct the record and tell us what you in fact believe. But your upvotes and contrariness to certain positions speaks volumesNo, I haven't.
Yes you have repeatedly. You are more than welcome to correct the record and tell us what you in fact believe. But your upvotes and contrariness to certain positions speaks volumesNo, I haven't.
Not lockdowns Those were a Chinese invention. Not masks (those were for health care workers per Faucis original advice). School closures and restrictions were only for short periods and only in the most severe outbreak times (not months)
Hey I think just the other day you and @espola were discussing this.Yes you have repeatedly. You are more than welcome to correct the record and tell us what you in fact believe. But your upvotes and contrariness to certain positions speaks volumes
Nah it’s a fact. Do your own research.I thought you would cite a reference, not just repeat your opinion.
Yes you have repeatedly. You are more than welcome to correct the record and tell us what you in fact believe. But your upvotes and contrariness to certain positions speaks volumes
Thr details are interesting, and complicated. Recommended for outpatients. But in large doses it weakens the early immune response.Hey I think just the other day you and @espola were discussing this.
The American Journal of Medicine Now Recommends HCQ for COVID19 | Principia Scientific Intl.
The American Journal of Medicine now (Jan. 2021) recommends Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Zinc for the treatment of Covid 19 outpatients. The irony is this is the treatment that former US President, Donald Trump promoted last year. The timing, right after the election, is interesting...principia-scientific.com
You are very quick to put people into red/blue, black/white. up/down extremes. I'm not.
Except when I call for a national mask mandate and closing indoor dining. I assume we still differ on those.It’s a shorthand. Dad4 and I are actually relatively close on the policy we’d follow and are probably closer than dad4 and newsoms former policy.
That you don’t do it is laughable considering you were the one who found my own positions obvious. And as I’ve invited to you if you think you’ve been incorrectly classified you are more than welcome to explain to us the nuances of your position (2nd invite)
We actually agree on indoor dining but differ on the rigorous ness and length of the closures. I think a National mask mandate would be unconstitutional but agree with masks for most indoor commercial situations but think our expectations about what they can do must be temperedExcept when I call for a national mask mandate and closing indoor dining. I assume we still differ on those.
Do you nick pick the cause of death in all tragic events? How many 9/11 victims were directly murdered by the terrorists? Deaths were caused by illegal activities instigated by trump and his minions. Not to mention the thousands that needlessly died due to trumps lack of effort concerning COVID-19."murder weapon"? Since the medical examiners report has not been released and there is an ongoing investigation... I assume you have facts or evidence to support he was murdered? OR are you one of the crackpots feeding a false narrative?
Hey I think just the other day you and @espola were discussing this.
The American Journal of Medicine Now Recommends HCQ for COVID19 | Principia Scientific Intl.
The American Journal of Medicine now (Jan. 2021) recommends Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Zinc for the treatment of Covid 19 outpatients. The irony is this is the treatment that former US President, Donald Trump promoted last year. The timing, right after the election, is interesting...principia-scientific.com
It’s a shorthand. Dad4 and I are actually relatively close on the policy we’d follow and are probably closer than dad4 and newsoms former policy.
That you don’t do it is laughable considering you were the one who found my own positions obvious. And as I’ve invited to you if you think you’ve been incorrectly classified you are more than welcome to explain to us the nuances of your position (2nd invite)
Courts. The legal system uses “judgment”, and US dictionaries follow. Grammarly imports some dictionary, and gets the legal spelling along with it.I have already responded that I don't judge a person or idea based on its partisan identity. Before responding to people I don't know or making judgements on an idea, I do some background research.
Why does Grammarly prefer "judgment" over "judgement"?
Courts. The legal system uses “judgment”, and US dictionaries follow. Grammarly imports some dictionary, and gets the legal spelling along with it.
Some dictionaries now carry the word "orbisculate" just because people asked them to.
Urban Dictionary: Orbisculate
1 to accidentally squirt juice and/or pulp into one’s eye, as from a grapefruit when using a spoon to scoop out a section for eating. 2 to accidentally squirt the inner content from fruits, vegetables and other foods onto one’s face, body or clothing, or onto that of a person nearby.www.urbandictionary.com
This right here is probably the funniest thing I’ve read on these forums in a long time.I have already responded that I don't judge a person or idea based on its partisan identity.
This right here is probably the funniest thing I’ve read on these forums in a long time.
Even funnier.Why is that?
“partisan identity” to me reads like politics, as in E is saying he doesn’t judge a person or an idea based on the political slant of the source (i.e. a good idea is a good idea and a good person is a good person, and of course the contrary applies as well). Opinions are all we have to base judgement on online. We have no idea how people actually are in real life. So many people assume an alter ego online.While I think it's noble to have the idea that we shouldn't judge people based upon their opinions, I don't think as humans we are capable of that.
I think the difference is whether or not you voice your judgements out loud