5 biological men roster wins Australian women's soccer league title & also undefeated this season

Ha no. This takes a very narrow view of our species. For most of our species' history bathing was done communally. It still is in many parts of the world. While certain cultures do traditionally split the sexes, even then, depending on the exact nature of the taboo, exceptions would be made for people who identify one way or the other. For places that don't allow even that, people would have to hide their identity. What's changing now is not so much how we handle bathrooms and locker rooms, but the fact that people who have been hiding their identities to conform to the cultural norms are refusing to.
Yeah... we don't bathe communally anymore and I'm not counting 3rd world countries where they still wear fig leaves because I don't think they endorse competitive club sports there.
 
Well said. I grew up in the UK and was caught off guard on my first school trip to France with their communal bathrooms and swimming pool changing rooms: First I knew was when I was using a urinal, and a woman appeared next to me to wash her hands. After my initial surprise, it was all normal by the end of the trip.

After all that hysteria over the Algerian boxer in the Olympics, the obvious takeaway, even for those opposed to her competing against other women, should have been that gender isn't as simple as Women are Women and Men are Men. I'll admit it's a tricky subject with regards to sport, but that doesn't mean we should hate on people for the way they were born. We need to figure out workable solutions.
The "hate" comes from waking up one morning and deciding all women should no longer have rights in sports and locker rooms, etc. It's not about bashing someone that feels inside out in the body they were born with, but rather the constant narrative that common sense can't be common anymore. That it's racist, sexist, misogynistic, etc. Where was Megan Rapinoe saying males should be allowed to play on female teams when she was an active player competing for a spot? 5 MTF trans players is a deliberate move, in this example, and that's flat out wrong.

When we start telling people that OBGYNs can't determine what a baby is when it's first born, we've officially lost our minds. 5-years from now we'll look back on this period of history and punch ourselves in the face.
 
It's not about bashing someone that feels inside out in the body they were born with, but rather the constant narrative that common sense can't be common anymore. That it's racist, sexist, misogynistic, etc. Where was Megan Rapinoe saying males should be allowed to play on female teams when she was an active player competing for a spot?

When we start telling people that OBGYNs can't determine what a baby is when it's first born, we've officially lost our minds. 5-years from now we'll look back on this period of history and punch ourselves in the face.
We have grown males saying they a woman and they can go and compete in the women's games. They take showers with our daughters just like Pedo Joe did with his dd and they think it's ok. This same group of people think it's ok for a male rapist who identifies as a women rapist to be locked up in the girl's prison, with the other female prisoners and guards. This is insane that were even having to debate this, but we live among clowns who want a crazy circus of freaks.
 
While I agree with some of what you say, again I point out participation is a concern for sports. Otherwise women should not have a separate category and everything should just be coed. Unless you quota the coed teams, I think you’d agree they’d quickly become all male.
Most of the coed teams/leagues I've seen do have a quota or 2. For example, you can only have so many ___, or have to have a minimum of ___, on the field at all times.
 
I lived in Hawaii in the early 70's and we had what would be in today's world a very culturally insensitive term for flip flops besides the most common names at that time of "go aheads" and "thongs". At the time, we didn't think much about it as it was in common use and there was no love loss in Hawaii for what happened at Pearl Harbor. Of course, I don't think any one today would appreciate me saying I'm going to wear my thongs to the beach, either.
About 5 years ago I hit a Nike outlet store and bought half a dozen pairs of Nike flip flops because they hold up well. Every chance I get to call them "thongs", I do it, just to piss my kids off.
 
I have old friend that had a son he named Max at birth. Dad and Mom saw the plumbing and that's why they named him Max. Later, when Max was older, he told his old man he wants to be a girl, always felt like a girl and his new name is Maxine. Maxine is now 17 and is starting to become a woman in many ways. Maxine is still packing a pisitol but that comes off next I guess, based on what my pal told me. The question really is does Maxine have the right to plays sports and take showers with females with or without her penis?
 
Most of the coed teams/leagues I've seen do have a quota or 2. For example, you can only have so many ___, or have to have a minimum of ___, on the field at all times.
o.k. so why isn't that the solution for all sports? Why have a separate women's category AT ALL?? Why not just coed all sports and quota the testosterone impaired??? AYSO for everyone, men and women play in the World Cup together?????? (yeah, I know, I'm being rhetorical....)
 
I have old friend that had a son he named Max at birth. Dad and Mom saw the plumbing and that's why they named him Max. Later, when Max was older, he told his old man he wants to be a girl, always felt like a girl and his new name is Maxine. Maxine is now 17 and is starting to become a woman in many ways. Maxine is still packing a pisitol but that comes off next I guess, based on what my pal told me. The question really is does Maxine have the right to plays sports and take showers with females with or without her penis?
Gives a new meaning to the term "CCW".
 
The gravitas of this conversation from both sides has been great reading. I do have an anecdote to share. This summer my youngest DD played against a women's USL team. It was a high scoring affair. I could not figure out why one player on the other team (who scored all 7 goals against our 5) could easily bypass the defense and score at times so easily. At the end of the game the girls were sharing that the player who scored was a FTM. The girls including my daughter were bothered by the distinct advantage this individual had over them.
 
o.k. so why isn't that the solution for all sports? Why have a separate women's category AT ALL?? Why not just coed all sports and quota the testosterone impaired??? AYSO for everyone, men and women play in the World Cup together?????? (yeah, I know, I'm being rhetorical....)
I've lobbied for co-ed locker rooms since middle school but nobody takes me seriously. Clearly I'm in the wrong generation or an innovator.

As for your quota idea, I'd respectfully submit something more in the way of "nut free zone for those with allergies" or the like.
 
Yeah... we don't bathe communally anymore and I'm not counting 3rd world countries where they still wear fig leaves because I don't think they endorse competitive club sports there.
Places I've personally bathed coed:
- France
- Russia
- Japan
- Korea
- Poland

I understand that it's common in Scandinavia as well.

All of these have robust soccer federations.
 
What constitutes biological sex? Just look at nature for the answer. The universe naturally produces male or female in almost everything in biology and is 100% evident in the mammalian class. That balance seems necessary for procreation in the reality we experience. Anything outside that binary is an outlier, a genetic flaw in the DNA code, like hermaphroditism or DSD. It’s similar to a computer code that isn’t perfect and has a bug. That’s how it has always been, and that’s how it will be in the future—anything outside of that is either genetically manipulated by intelligent life or simply an error in nature. There's no such thing as biological sex being a spectrum; that's complete pseudo-science BS created by a new neo leftist agenda.

When it comes to fairness, I don’t mind so much if pre-puberty girls play with boys and vice versa; it's after puberty when it no longer becomes fair. Women’s sports need a clear and objective definition of what qualifies someone to compete biologically.

From a participation standpoint, consider the new generation where now 1 in 5 identify as non-binary. We’re talking about millions now, so they can definitely have their own league. They are quick to claim there are more genders than male or female, yet want to be included in the binary male or female categories when it’s convenient for their narcissistic cause. It makes no sense at all. They have the numbers today to start their own league, go play coed, go play with men, go play with who you identify with, but please stay away from biological females. If you have a daughter who plays sports, this should be a no-brainer.
Bunch of assumptions here I’d challenge

-ok if it’s a business no subsidies, no title ix equivalencies for scholarship. Let the market decide. We’ll see how many women’s sports are left (not many…almost all are subsidized)

-successful assumes facts not in evidence. It begs the question of what is the measure of success. If financial womens sports are an abysmal failure.

-“mistakes” is a value judgment about what you think is happening here. Your bias is showing.

-like gayness you assume it’s some life style choice. There seem to be biological links including autism and a difference in brain structure.

-the question of separateness is different from the question of what access you then have to give. Dumping them into the male category doesn’t achieve that. You want to separateness, as you state there’s a price to be paid: subsidize it out of the boys and girls. Less money for them.

-natural law. Snort. I hate aquinas. Left and right Both use it as a way to impose their vision of morality.
It seems one is proposing an objective standard and the other a more subjective standard. Maybe "fair" as Veritas and I use it is the wrong term, because having an objective standard may not be fair, but it does bring "clarity" to participation in sports (assuming we use something like a chromosome benchmark). If you can't compete because of this standard, its not that the sport or the culture that is unfair, it's that life/biology is not fair. You can't design human programs around rare exceptions. It's impractical, ineffective and will only cause confusion. I have to say GraceT, you lose me at Aquinas, Rawlsian, Aristotle and post-Modernists. I'm just too simple-minded and not learned, I guess.

The Algerian boxer and the 5 Australian transgenders situation have nothing in common with each other. At this point we have zero evidence that the Algerian boxer has XY chromosome, that was only an allegation by a corrupt Russian organization.

Also participation in sports and the use of bathrooms have zero in common and we shouldn't conflate the two. I've mentioned this before, but one of my son's best friends is transgender teen boy. You would never know he was born a girl in a million years. If he used the girls bathroom people would freak that there was a boy in the girls bathroom. Not all transgenders look like Rachel Levine and Caitlyn Jenner.
 

Meet Valentina Petrillo: The Italian sprinter set to become the first Paralympic transgender athlete.

She’s lived most of her life as a man and only came out as transgender to her wife - with whom she has a son - in 2017 before beginning hormone therapy two years later. I have a penis for all to see but I am woman, hear me roar!!! Thoughts?
1724875710180.png
 

Meet Valentina Petrillo: The Italian sprinter set to become the first Paralympic transgender athlete.

She’s lived most of her life as a man and only came out as transgender to her wife - with whom she has a son - in 2017 before beginning hormone therapy two years later. I have a penis for all to see but I am woman, hear me roar!!! Thoughts?
View attachment 22841
Good thing she doesn't pole vault, because she would be at a disadvantage.
 
I don't know how old you are, but this has been true for at least the last century and likely much longer. The specific words and groups change, but there has always been context switching among marginalized groups and (re)appropriation of slurs.
Maybe so and maybe it's a function of more awareness, but we've certainly lost the concept from my childhood of "stick and stones will break my bones, but names will never hurt me". It's now "words are violence", which is a thinly veiled attempt to stifle free speech.
 
The gravitas of this conversation from both sides has been great reading. I do have an anecdote to share. This summer my youngest DD played against a women's USL team. It was a high scoring affair. I could not figure out why one player on the other team (who scored all 7 goals against our 5) could easily bypass the defense and score at times so easily. At the end of the game the girls were sharing that the player who scored was a FTM. The girls including my daughter were bothered by the distinct advantage this individual had over them.

Places I've personally bathed coed:
- France
- Russia
- Japan
- Korea
- Poland

I understand that it's common in Scandinavia as well.

All of these have robust soccer federations.
With all due respect, this may be a "you" thing more than a "we" thing with bathing... and when are you traveling again?

"robust" is a relative term.
 
Good thing she doesn't pole vault, because she would be at a disadvantage.
A little research, which I quickly deleted in my history file, indicates he's 'visually impaired"... thus qualifying for the Paralympics.

Ironic... I'm visually impaired now as well.

1724879019941.png
 
Back
Top