2017/2018 GDA Club Standings

Perhaps this was mentioned elsewhere in this thread but there are a couple of things to consider here.

1. Several teams moved kids up in age throughout the season especially down the playoff stretch. Slammers for example had tw u15 studs up all season and only brought them down to help out. Many others had kids playing up LAG, WC and Surf as well. So we never get a true assessment of how each true-age team is doing. I believe LAG had at least an 05 playing up at 03. Can’t imagine what she’d do at her own age group.

2. The schedules were not equal. Anyone who drew Buringame was gifted 6 points. It definitely had an impact in some of the outcomes between Northwest-Southwest and Northwest’s matchups in showcases.

3. Unless this was factored in, Northwest’s winning percentage is brought down quite a bit because of Burlingame, and the leagues where team feasted on the free points benefited.

These are incremental calculation changes for the most part but still deserve to be mentioned.

Excellent work on the breakdowns.
 
Josep said:
Perhaps this was mentioned elsewhere in this thread but there are a couple of things to consider here.

1. Several teams moved kids up in age throughout the season especially down the playoff stretch. Slammers for example had tw u15 studs up all season and only brought them down to help out. Many others had kids playing up LAG, WC and Surf as well. So we never get a true assessment of how each true-age team is doing. I believe LAG had at least an 05 playing up at 03. Can’t imagine what she’d do at her own age group.

2. The schedules were not equal. Anyone who drew Buringame was gifted 6 points. It definitely had an impact in some of the outcomes between Northwest-Southwest and Northwest’s matchups in showcases.

3. Unless this was factored in, Northwest’s winning percentage is brought down quite a bit because of Burlingame, and the leagues where team feasted on the free points benefited.

These are incremental calculation changes for the most part but still deserve to be mentioned.

Excellent work on the breakdowns.
Click to expand...

The leading scorer on Real’s 01/02 team was an 04!
 
Josep said:
Perhaps this was mentioned elsewhere in this thread but there are a couple of things to consider here.

1. Several teams moved kids up in age throughout the season especially down the playoff stretch. Slammers for example had tw u15 studs up all season and only brought them down to help out. Many others had kids playing up LAG, WC and Surf as well. So we never get a true assessment of how each true-age team is doing. I believe LAG had at least an 05 playing up at 03. Can’t imagine what she’d do at her own age group.

2. The schedules were not equal. Anyone who drew Buringame was gifted 6 points. It definitely had an impact in some of the outcomes between Northwest-Southwest and Northwest’s matchups in showcases.

3. Unless this was factored in, Northwest’s winning percentage is brought down quite a bit because of Burlingame, and the leagues where team feasted on the free points benefited.

These are incremental calculation changes for the most part but still deserve to be mentioned.

Excellent work on the breakdowns.
Click to expand...
LAG did not have an 05 playing 03. They have 2 05’s playing 04. One 06 playing 04. And one 04 playing 03.
 
LASTMAN14 said:
LAG did not have an 05 playing 03. They have 2 05’s playing 04. One 06 playing 04. And one 04 playing 03.
Click to expand...

Thanks. I thought the beast mode girl was an 05 on the 03 team! Appreciate the Info. But they are a team that sacrificed some youngers to make their olders better. Those 04-06 teams will be tough as nails with all their girls. I’m sure they are tough now.
 
Josep said:
Thanks. I thought the beast mode girl was an 05 on the 03 team! Appreciate the Info. But they are a team that sacrificed some youngers to make their olders better. Those 04-06 teams will be tough as nails with all their girls. I’m sure they are tough now.
Click to expand...
The 05 I think your speaking of is at Beach. And is playing 03.
 
Josep said:
Perhaps this was mentioned elsewhere in this thread but there are a couple of things to consider here.

1. Several teams moved kids up in age throughout the season especially down the playoff stretch. Slammers for example had tw u15 studs up all season and only brought them down to help out. Many others had kids playing up LAG, WC and Surf as well. So we never get a true assessment of how each true-age team is doing. I believe LAG had at least an 05 playing up at 03. Can’t imagine what she’d do at her own age group.

2. The schedules were not equal. Anyone who drew Buringame was gifted 6 points. It definitely had an impact in some of the outcomes between Northwest-Southwest and Northwest’s matchups in showcases.

3. Unless this was factored in, Northwest’s winning percentage is brought down quite a bit because of Burlingame, and the leagues where team feasted on the free points benefited.

These are incremental calculation changes for the most part but still deserve to be mentioned.

Excellent work on the breakdowns.
Click to expand...
Thanks @Josep. Good point about Burlingame. It does cause a distortion. But as you say, it is incremental. Any team that played them was credited with an automatic win, but the benefit of that automatic win was offset by a hit to their strength of schedule. I haven't tested to see whether it was an incremental benefit or detriment. But it would be very small given the large number of overall games and the fact that goal differential is not part of the NCAA's RPI formula (the one I used). I suspect in the aggregate it hurt the NW division because they not only had to include Burlingame's results, but had the strength of schedule brought down for all their teams.
 
SocalPapa said:
MUCH better results for the home teams at U18-19.

I don't follow this age group, but from these stats it looks like a tragedy that only Slammers, Surf and SC Del Sol are among the 16 team playoff field. Real, Blues, and Legends were all robbed. [Edit: per the post below, Real and Legends are now in the playoffs.]


1 LAFC Slammers (26-4-2) PCT: 0.8438 OPP: 0.525 OPOP: 0.5207 RPI: 0.6036 GD: 101
2 Crossfire Premier (22-0-2) PCT: 0.9583 OPP: 0.4773 OPOP: 0.4938 RPI: 0.6017 GD: 82
3 NC Courage (23-2-2) PCT: 0.8889 OPP: 0.5111 OPOP: 0.4914 RPI: 0.6006 GD: 72
4 Solar Soccer Club (23-1-3) PCT: 0.9074 OPP: 0.479 OPOP: 0.5195 RPI: 0.5962 GD: 77
5 NTH Tophat (20-1-6) PCT: 0.8519 OPP: 0.5174 OPOP: 0.4892 RPI: 0.594 GD: 87
6 San Diego Surf (26-5-1) PCT: 0.8281 OPP: 0.5103 OPOP: 0.5227 RPI: 0.5929 GD: 86
7 Sky Blue - PDA (23-3-2) PCT: 0.8571 OPP: 0.5037 OPOP: 0.5013 RPI: 0.5915 GD: 87
8 Real So Cal (21-7-4) PCT: 0.7188 OPP: 0.5485 OPOP: 0.5192 RPI: 0.5837 GD: 41
9 SC del Sol (23-4-5) PCT: 0.7969 OPP: 0.5088 OPOP: 0.5181 RPI: 0.5831 GD: 45
10 Eclipse Select Soccer Club (19-4-2) PCT: 0.8 OPP: 0.5057 OPOP: 0.5175 RPI: 0.5822 GD: 54
11 Penn Fusion Soccer Academy (20-5-3) PCT: 0.7679 OPP: 0.5223 OPOP: 0.4982 RPI: 0.5777 GD: 66
12 Real Colorado (18-3-3) PCT: 0.8125 OPP: 0.4904 OPOP: 0.5132 RPI: 0.5766 GD: 54
13 Concorde Fire (20-5-2) PCT: 0.7778 OPP: 0.5163 OPOP: 0.4915 RPI: 0.5755 GD: 54
14 Legends FC (21-6-5) PCT: 0.7344 OPP: 0.5188 OPOP: 0.5217 RPI: 0.5734 GD: 34
15 So Cal Blues Soccer Club (18-8-6) PCT: 0.6563 OPP: 0.5443 OPOP: 0.5175 RPI: 0.5656 GD: 54
16 Midwest United FC (15-6-5) PCT: 0.6731 OPP: 0.5263 OPOP: 0.5128 RPI: 0.5596 GD: 34
17 Michigan Hawks (17-4-4) PCT: 0.76 OPP: 0.4801 OPOP: 0.5153 RPI: 0.5589 GD: 60
18 FC Virginia (20-7-1) PCT: 0.7321 OPP: 0.4763 OPOP: 0.5026 RPI: 0.5469 GD: 60
19 Sockers FC (13-8-4) PCT: 0.6 OPP: 0.536 OPOP: 0.5126 RPI: 0.5462 GD: 15
20 Boston Breakers Academy (24-3-1) PCT: 0.875 OPP: 0.4167 OPOP: 0.4703 RPI: 0.5447 GD: 132
21 La Roca Futbol Club (16-4-4) PCT: 0.75 OPP: 0.4607 OPOP: 0.4942 RPI: 0.5414 GD: 40
22 Lonestar SC Academy (11-9-6) PCT: 0.5385 OPP: 0.5556 OPOP: 0.5074 RPI: 0.5393 GD: 2
23 Beach Futbol Club (16-9-7) PCT: 0.6094 OPP: 0.511 OPOP: 0.5223 RPI: 0.5384 GD: 33
24 Portland Thorns FC (12-5-7) PCT: 0.6458 OPP: 0.4937 OPOP: 0.4891 RPI: 0.5306 GD: 19
25 FC Dallas (14-11-2) PCT: 0.5556 OPP: 0.5124 OPOP: 0.5142 RPI: 0.5236 GD: 18
26 Lamorinda Soccer Club (15-11-2) PCT: 0.5714 OPP: 0.5012 OPOP: 0.5013 RPI: 0.5188 GD: 30
27 Cincinnati Development Academy (10-9-5) PCT: 0.5208 OPP: 0.5203 OPOP: 0.5131 RPI: 0.5186 GD: 3
28 Charlotte Soccer Academy (13-10-6) PCT: 0.5517 OPP: 0.5063 OPOP: 0.4893 RPI: 0.5134 GD: 24
29 LA Galaxy San Diego (13-13-6) PCT: 0.5 OPP: 0.5108 OPOP: 0.5201 RPI: 0.5104 GD: -5
30 SPORTING Blue Valley (12-10-3) PCT: 0.54 OPP: 0.491 OPOP: 0.5115 RPI: 0.5084 GD: 7
31 Washington Spirit Academy - Baltimore Armour (10-10-7) PCT: 0.5 OPP: 0.5125 OPOP: 0.4982 RPI: 0.5058 GD: -4
32 Eagles Soccer Club (9-15-8) PCT: 0.4063 OPP: 0.5499 OPOP: 0.5145 RPI: 0.5051 GD: -16
33 United Futbol Academy (12-14-1) PCT: 0.463 OPP: 0.5289 OPOP: 0.4852 RPI: 0.5015 GD: -2
34 Houston Dash (9-12-5) PCT: 0.4423 OPP: 0.5175 OPOP: 0.5138 RPI: 0.4978 GD: -18
35 West Coast Futbol Club (12-16-4) PCT: 0.4375 OPP: 0.5164 OPOP: 0.5186 RPI: 0.4972 GD: -7
36 New York City FC (17-8-3) PCT: 0.6607 OPP: 0.4298 OPOP: 0.4674 RPI: 0.497 GD: 38
37 Placer United SC (11-13-4) PCT: 0.4643 OPP: 0.4971 OPOP: 0.4975 RPI: 0.489 GD: -9
38 Oakwood Soccer Club (15-10-2) PCT: 0.5926 OPP: 0.4418 OPOP: 0.4686 RPI: 0.4862 GD: 25
39 Orlando Pride (13-13-2) PCT: 0.5 OPP: 0.4822 OPOP: 0.4794 RPI: 0.486 GD: 3
40 Nationals (8-17-2) PCT: 0.3333 OPP: 0.5456 OPOP: 0.5087 RPI: 0.4833 GD: -24
41 Pateadores (10-17-5) PCT: 0.3906 OPP: 0.5134 OPOP: 0.5113 RPI: 0.4822 GD: -29
42 Reign Academy (8-13-3) PCT: 0.3958 OPP: 0.5176 OPOP: 0.487 RPI: 0.4795 GD: -26
43 California Thorns FC (9-14-4) PCT: 0.4074 OPP: 0.4949 OPOP: 0.4976 RPI: 0.4737 GD: -19
44 Cedar Stars Academy - Monmouth (8-17-2) PCT: 0.3333 OPP: 0.5297 OPOP: 0.4981 RPI: 0.4727 GD: -34
45 Indiana Fire Academy (8-15-3) PCT: 0.3654 OPP: 0.5083 OPOP: 0.5073 RPI: 0.4723 GD: -7
46 Colorado Rush (7-14-3) PCT: 0.3542 OPP: 0.513 OPOP: 0.5086 RPI: 0.4722 GD: -11
47 Washington Spirit Academy - Virginia (7-14-7) PCT: 0.375 OPP: 0.5051 OPOP: 0.5002 RPI: 0.4714 GD: -34
48 LA Galaxy (7-21-4) PCT: 0.2813 OPP: 0.538 OPOP: 0.5208 RPI: 0.4695 GD: -49
49 FC Stars (12-14-0) PCT: 0.4615 OPP: 0.4676 OPOP: 0.4648 RPI: 0.4654 GD: -31
50 Shattuck - Saint Mary's (6-16-5) PCT: 0.3148 OPP: 0.5094 OPOP: 0.5116 RPI: 0.4613 GD: -45
51 Albion SC (8-23-1) PCT: 0.2656 OPP: 0.5193 OPOP: 0.517 RPI: 0.4553 GD: -54
52 PA Classics (6-18-2) PCT: 0.2692 OPP: 0.5192 OPOP: 0.4935 RPI: 0.4503 GD: -47
53 FC United Soccer Club (6-18-2) PCT: 0.2692 OPP: 0.5094 OPOP: 0.5124 RPI: 0.4501 GD: -59
54 Los Angeles Premier Futbol Club (6-23-3) PCT: 0.2344 OPP: 0.5236 OPOP: 0.5178 RPI: 0.4498 GD: -66
55 Dallas Texans (5-19-3) PCT: 0.2407 OPP: 0.523 OPOP: 0.5091 RPI: 0.449 GD: -40
56 United Soccer Alliance (11-13-4) PCT: 0.4643 OPP: 0.4216 OPOP: 0.4865 RPI: 0.4485 GD: -7
57 FC Fury NY (11-16-0) PCT: 0.4074 OPP: 0.4569 OPOP: 0.4603 RPI: 0.4454 GD: -30
58 Virginia Development Academy (6-19-3) PCT: 0.2679 OPP: 0.4973 OPOP: 0.5003 RPI: 0.4407 GD: -51
59 FC Kansas City (5-20-0) PCT: 0.2 OPP: 0.5264 OPOP: 0.4994 RPI: 0.4381 GD: -57
60 San Jose Earthquakes (6-21-1) PCT: 0.2321 OPP: 0.4703 OPOP: 0.5007 RPI: 0.4184 GD: -56
61 West Florida Flames (6-19-3) PCT: 0.2679 OPP: 0.4562 OPOP: 0.4832 RPI: 0.4158 GD: -45
62 Boca United Football Club (6-19-3) PCT: 0.2679 OPP: 0.4413 OPOP: 0.4834 RPI: 0.4085 GD: -70
~ Lakeland FC (0-0-3) PCT: 0.5 OPP: 0.3076 OPOP: 0.4984 RPI: 0.4034 GD: 0
63 PSV Union Football Club (3-23-1) PCT: 0.1296 OPP: 0.4867 OPOP: 0.4959 RPI: 0.3997 GD: -101
64 Sky Blue - NYSC (6-20-2) PCT: 0.25 OPP: 0.4429 OPOP: 0.4627 RPI: 0.3996 GD: -53
65 IMG Academy (3-23-4) PCT: 0.1667 OPP: 0.4736 OPOP: 0.4758 RPI: 0.3974 GD: -85
66 Long Island SC (4-20-1) PCT: 0.18 OPP: 0.4754 OPOP: 0.4547 RPI: 0.3964 GD: -71
67 Weston FC (4-22-2) PCT: 0.1786 OPP: 0.4568 OPOP: 0.4793 RPI: 0.3929 GD: -84
68 Burlingame Soccer Club (0-25-0) PCT: 0 OPP: 0.5175 OPOP: 0.5006 RPI: 0.3839 GD: -75
69 Empire United (1-24-3) PCT: 0.0893 OPP: 0.4696 OPOP: 0.4614 RPI: 0.3725 GD: -116

Conference Rankings

1 Southwest - West Division 0.5293
2 Mid-America - Central Division 0.5147
3 Frontier - Central Division 0.5112
4 Atlantic - East Division 0.5071
5 Southeast - East Division 0.4849
6 Northwest - West Division 0.4837
7 Northeast - East Division 0.4509


Corrected on 6/16/18 (had the same formula error as my draft U16/17 calc - didn't pick up all the games)
Click to expand...
Just curious why you don't include SC Del Sol in red. They're part of the Southwest Division and are part of that equation, no?
 
Driveandpay said:
Just curious why you don't include SC Del Sol in red. They're part of the Southwest Division and are part of that equation, no?
Click to expand...
Because this is a So Cal soccer forum. The highlights are to enable people to more easily pick out the So Cal teams (as well as the division those teams play in).
 
SocalPapa said:
Because this is a So Cal soccer forum. The highlights are to enable people to more easily pick out the So Cal teams (as well as the division those teams play in).
Click to expand...
Well this thread does talk a lot about the SW division of which SC del Sol is a part of. And that is a club that the So Cal teams play all year long as well. Seems to make sense since we are looking at what the SW div does, etc.
 
Desert Hound said:
Well this thread does talk a lot about the SW division of which SC del Sol is a part of. And that is a club that the So Cal teams play all year long as well. Seems to make sense since we are looking at what the SW div does, etc.
Click to expand...
I understand there are many other ways this info could have been organized. No offense to SC del Sol.
 
I see different Rank #'s on the USSDA standings than what SocalPapa posted. What am I missing? Here's what I see on a quick check (minus U14 since they are not tabulated by USSDA):
(U15, U17, U19)
Tophat: 4, 7, 8 (not 6, 3, 5)
FC Dallas: 2, 3, 26 (not 1,1, 25)
Slammers: 30, 1, 6 (not 26, 4, 1)
PDA: 1, 8, 5 (not 11, 9, 7)
Crossfire: 29, 2, 1 (not 29, 5, 2)
Etc etc -
am I looking at the wrong source? Or was his club ranking done before the final regular season rankings were updated?
http://www.ussoccerda.com/sam/standings/league/standings.php?leagueId=MTAwOA==
thanks
 
olympico11 said:
I see different Rank #'s on the USSDA standings than what SocalPapa posted. What am I missing? Here's what I see on a quick check (minus U14 since they are not tabulated by USSDA):
(U15, U17, U19)
Tophat: 4, 7, 8 (not 6, 3, 5)
FC Dallas: 2, 3, 26 (not 1,1, 25)
Slammers: 30, 1, 6 (not 26, 4, 1)
PDA: 1, 8, 5 (not 11, 9, 7)
Crossfire: 29, 2, 1 (not 29, 5, 2)
Etc etc -
am I looking at the wrong source? Or was his club ranking done before the final regular season rankings were updated?
http://www.ussoccerda.com/sam/standings/league/standings.php?leagueId=MTAwOA==
thanks
Click to expand...
The USSDA numbers are the DA playoff seedings, which are based strictly on points/game (and tiebreakers). My ranking is an RPI (the same formula NCAA uses for soccer). The difference is primarily strength of schedule. PDA's U15 team may be a #1 seed in the playoffs, but with a #11 in RPI they are not quite the favorite they appear to be. We'll see how this all actually plays out though.
 
SocalPapa said:
The USSDA numbers are the DA playoff seedings, which are based strictly on points/game (and tiebreakers). My ranking is an RPI (the same formula NCAA uses for soccer). The difference is primarily strength of schedule. PDA's U15 team may be a #1 seed in the playoffs, but with a #11 in RPI they are not quite the favorite they appear to be. We'll see how this all actually plays out though.
Click to expand...
PDA's #1 seeded U15 team was upset by the #22 seeded SC del Sol team in their second playoff game. The RPI saw PDA's weakness.
 
Here is GU16-17 as of 2/28/19. Numbers checked now (and I have edited this post to make a few minor corrections). Let me know what age group you want to see next!

Legends is having another good year. And Solar's goal differential is INSANE (two players with 26 goals apiece, both 2003's).

Note, some win/loss records are different because I included the Arlington team's games in my RPI even though DA didn't record those 3 games as official games.

Rank Club (W-L-T) GD = total goal differential
1 Solar Soccer Club (19-0-1) PCT: 0.975 OPP: 0.5696 OPOP: 0.544 RPI: 0.6645 GD: 94
2 Tophat (10-2-2) PCT: 0.7857 OPP: 0.6029 OPOP: 0.5098 RPI: 0.6253 GD: 27
3 Legends FC (16-1-1) PCT: 0.9167 OPP: 0.5295 OPOP: 0.5252 RPI: 0.6252 GD: 37
4 NC Courage (8-3-3) PCT: 0.6786 OPP: 0.6138 OPOP: 0.5157 RPI: 0.6055 GD: 15
5 Charlotte Soccer Academy (10-4-2) PCT: 0.6875 OPP: 0.5991 OPOP: 0.5093 RPI: 0.5988 GD: 6
6 Penn Fusion Soccer Academy (11-1-2) PCT: 0.8571 OPP: 0.4985 OPOP: 0.5091 RPI: 0.5908 GD: 30
7 FC Dallas (12-3-4) PCT: 0.7368 OPP: 0.5414 OPOP: 0.5335 RPI: 0.5883 GD: 23
8 Lonestar SC Academy (12-4-1) PCT: 0.7353 OPP: 0.5396 OPOP: 0.5289 RPI: 0.5858 GD: 24
9 Beach Futbol Club (12-4-3) PCT: 0.7105 OPP: 0.5553 OPOP: 0.5192 RPI: 0.5851 GD: 13
10 SPORTING Blue Valley (9-3-2) PCT: 0.7143 OPP: 0.5236 OPOP: 0.5304 RPI: 0.573 GD: 20
11 Dallas Texans (9-5-1) PCT: 0.6333 OPP: 0.563 OPOP: 0.53 RPI: 0.5723 GD: 3
12 Midwest United FC (8-2-3) PCT: 0.7308 OPP: 0.5179 OPOP: 0.509 RPI: 0.5689 GD: 22
13 Crossfire Premier (9-3-3) PCT: 0.7 OPP: 0.5123 OPOP: 0.5088 RPI: 0.5583 GD: 21
14 Sockers FC (8-1-5) PCT: 0.75 OPP: 0.4666 OPOP: 0.5116 RPI: 0.5487 GD: 16
15 San Diego Surf (8-3-5) PCT: 0.6563 OPP: 0.4988 OPOP: 0.5104 RPI: 0.5411 GD: 10
16 Real Colorado (7-5-2) PCT: 0.5714 OPP: 0.5326 OPOP: 0.5276 RPI: 0.5411 GD: 5
17 Utah Royals FC- Arizona (9-6-2) PCT: 0.5882 OPP: 0.528 OPOP: 0.5132 RPI: 0.5394 GD: 8
18 So Cal Blues Soccer Club (11-6-6) PCT: 0.6087 OPP: 0.515 OPOP: 0.5084 RPI: 0.5368 GD: 11
19 California Thorns FC (8-6-4) PCT: 0.5556 OPP: 0.5287 OPOP: 0.5239 RPI: 0.5342 GD: -2
20 New York City FC (10-3-1) PCT: 0.75 OPP: 0.4494 OPOP: 0.4833 RPI: 0.533 GD: 30
21 LA Galaxy San Diego (9-8-4) PCT: 0.5238 OPP: 0.5412 OPOP: 0.5218 RPI: 0.532 GD: 1
22 United Futbol Academy (7-9-0) PCT: 0.4375 OPP: 0.5848 OPOP: 0.5117 RPI: 0.5297 GD: -15
23 OC Surf Soccer Club (7-8-2) PCT: 0.4706 OPP: 0.5697 OPOP: 0.5039 RPI: 0.5285 GD: -1
24 San Jose Earthquakes (6-7-5) PCT: 0.4722 OPP: 0.5657 OPOP: 0.5068 RPI: 0.5276 GD: 1
25 Cincinnati Development Academy (9-4-1) PCT: 0.6786 OPP: 0.4524 OPOP: 0.5118 RPI: 0.5238 GD: 17
26 Nationals (8-5-2) PCT: 0.6 OPP: 0.4904 OPOP: 0.4952 RPI: 0.519 GD: 17
27 FC United Soccer Club (7-3-3) PCT: 0.6538 OPP: 0.446 OPOP: 0.5184 RPI: 0.5161 GD: 2
28 SC del Sol (7-9-6) PCT: 0.4545 OPP: 0.5461 OPOP: 0.5112 RPI: 0.5145 GD: -1
29 Reign Academy (5-4-6) PCT: 0.5333 OPP: 0.509 OPOP: 0.4909 RPI: 0.5106 GD: 4
30 Oakwood Soccer Club (9-5-0) PCT: 0.6429 OPP: 0.4497 OPOP: 0.4749 RPI: 0.5043 GD: 25
31 FC Fury NY (7-5-1) PCT: 0.5769 OPP: 0.4769 OPOP: 0.4706 RPI: 0.5003 GD: 9
32 NEFC (7-6-2) PCT: 0.5333 OPP: 0.4957 OPOP: 0.4691 RPI: 0.4985 GD: 4
33 Michigan Jaguars FC (4-6-4) PCT: 0.4286 OPP: 0.5302 OPOP: 0.487 RPI: 0.494 GD: -6
34 LA Galaxy (6-8-3) PCT: 0.4412 OPP: 0.4973 OPOP: 0.5082 RPI: 0.486 GD: -4
35 IMG Academy (7-6-3) PCT: 0.5313 OPP: 0.4555 OPOP: 0.4888 RPI: 0.4828 GD: 9
36 Real So Cal (8-6-3) PCT: 0.5588 OPP: 0.4298 OPOP: 0.5061 RPI: 0.4811 GD: 8
37 La Roca Futbol Club (5-7-4) PCT: 0.4375 OPP: 0.4965 OPOP: 0.4891 RPI: 0.4799 GD: -4
38 FC Virginia (6-7-3) PCT: 0.4688 OPP: 0.475 OPOP: 0.4961 RPI: 0.4787 GD: -2
39 Sporting Omaha (4-9-0) PCT: 0.3077 OPP: 0.5406 OPOP: 0.5141 RPI: 0.4757 GD: -19
40 Los Angeles Premier Futbol Club (5-8-2) PCT: 0.4 OPP: 0.4954 OPOP: 0.4873 RPI: 0.4695 GD: -10
41 Sky Blue - NYSC (7-5-1) PCT: 0.5769 OPP: 0.4078 OPOP: 0.4807 RPI: 0.4683 GD: 24
42 Eagles Soccer Club (4-10-3) PCT: 0.3235 OPP: 0.5174 OPOP: 0.4971 RPI: 0.4639 GD: -5
43 CSA Impact (3-8-3) PCT: 0.3214 OPP: 0.5225 OPOP: 0.4754 RPI: 0.4604 GD: -11
44 Lamorinda Soccer Club (4-8-5) PCT: 0.3824 OPP: 0.477 OPOP: 0.4894 RPI: 0.4565 GD: -12
45 South Florida Football Academy (3-6-5) PCT: 0.3929 OPP: 0.4671 OPOP: 0.4936 RPI: 0.4552 GD: -7
46 Placer United Soccer Club (6-9-2) PCT: 0.4118 OPP: 0.4498 OPOP: 0.4889 RPI: 0.4501 GD: -12
47 Houston Dash (4-12-1) PCT: 0.2647 OPP: 0.4959 OPOP: 0.5185 RPI: 0.4438 GD: -20
48 Colorado Rush (2-12-0) PCT: 0.1429 OPP: 0.5535 OPOP: 0.5164 RPI: 0.4415 GD: -47
49 Cedar Stars Academy - Monmouth (4-5-1) PCT: 0.45 OPP: 0.4237 OPOP: 0.4663 RPI: 0.4409 GD: 2
50 PA Classics (3-4-3) PCT: 0.45 OPP: 0.4149 OPOP: 0.481 RPI: 0.4402 GD: 7
51 Pateadores (5-11-4) PCT: 0.35 OPP: 0.4479 OPOP: 0.5076 RPI: 0.4383 GD: -13
52 West Florida Flames (3-8-5) PCT: 0.3438 OPP: 0.4477 OPOP: 0.4878 RPI: 0.4317 GD: -17
53 Portland Thorns FC (3-9-4) PCT: 0.3125 OPP: 0.4537 OPOP: 0.483 RPI: 0.4258 GD: -13
54 Oklahoma Energy FC (4-13-0) PCT: 0.2353 OPP: 0.4661 OPOP: 0.5307 RPI: 0.4245 GD: -36
55 Albion SC (4-13-2) PCT: 0.2632 OPP: 0.4672 OPOP: 0.4827 RPI: 0.42 GD: -24
56 Shattuck - St. Mary's (1-15-1) PCT: 0.0882 OPP: 0.5471 OPOP: 0.4763 RPI: 0.4147 GD: -44
57 Weston FC (4-9-3) PCT: 0.3438 OPP: 0.4093 OPOP: 0.4893 RPI: 0.4129 GD: -23
58 Seacoast United (3-9-1) PCT: 0.2692 OPP: 0.4601 OPOP: 0.4589 RPI: 0.4121 GD: -14
59 FC Albertson Fury (2-10-1) PCT: 0.1923 OPP: 0.4539 OPOP: 0.4575 RPI: 0.3894 GD: -31
60 Empire United (1-11-2) PCT: 0.1429 OPP: 0.4639 OPOP: 0.4331 RPI: 0.376 GD: -59
61 United Soccer Alliance (2-9-2) PCT: 0.2308 OPP: 0.408 OPOP: 0.4543 RPI: 0.3753 GD: -21
62 Washington Spirit Academy - Maryland (1-8-1) PCT: 0.15 OPP: 0.4157 OPOP: 0.4521 RPI: 0.3584 GD: -25
63 Washington Spirit Academy - Virginia (0-12-1) PCT: 0.0385 OPP: 0.4408 OPOP: 0.4545 RPI: 0.3436 GD: -45
64 Arlington Soccer Association (1-2-0) PCT: 0.3333 OPP: 0.2123 OPOP: 0.4463 RPI: 0.3011 GD: -3

All SW division teams highlighted in red

Division Average RPI Rankings
1 Frontier - Central Division 0.5311
2 Southwest - West Division 0.5115
3 Mid-America - Central Division 0.5057
4 Southeast - East Division 0.5019
5 Northwest - West Division 0.4929
6 Northeast - East Division 0.4602
7 Atlantic - East Division 0.4220
 
Last edited:
SocalPapa said:
Here is GU16-17 as of 2/28/19. Numbers checked now (and I have edited this post to make a few minor corrections). Let me know what age group you want to see next!

Legends is having another good year. And Solar's goal differential is INSANE (two players with 26 goals apiece, both 2003's).

Note, some win/loss records are different because I included the Arlington team's games in my RPI even though DA didn't record those 3 games as official games.

Rank Club (W-L-T) GD = total goal differential
1 Solar Soccer Club (19-0-1) PCT: 0.975 OPP: 0.5696 OPOP: 0.544 RPI: 0.6645 GD: 94
2 Tophat (10-2-2) PCT: 0.7857 OPP: 0.6029 OPOP: 0.5098 RPI: 0.6253 GD: 27
3 Legends FC (16-1-1) PCT: 0.9167 OPP: 0.5295 OPOP: 0.5252 RPI: 0.6252 GD: 37
4 NC Courage (8-3-3) PCT: 0.6786 OPP: 0.6138 OPOP: 0.5157 RPI: 0.6055 GD: 15
5 Charlotte Soccer Academy (10-4-2) PCT: 0.6875 OPP: 0.5991 OPOP: 0.5093 RPI: 0.5988 GD: 6
6 Penn Fusion Soccer Academy (11-1-2) PCT: 0.8571 OPP: 0.4985 OPOP: 0.5091 RPI: 0.5908 GD: 30
7 FC Dallas (12-3-4) PCT: 0.7368 OPP: 0.5414 OPOP: 0.5335 RPI: 0.5883 GD: 23
8 Lonestar SC Academy (12-4-1) PCT: 0.7353 OPP: 0.5396 OPOP: 0.5289 RPI: 0.5858 GD: 24
9 Beach Futbol Club (12-4-3) PCT: 0.7105 OPP: 0.5553 OPOP: 0.5192 RPI: 0.5851 GD: 13
10 SPORTING Blue Valley (9-3-2) PCT: 0.7143 OPP: 0.5236 OPOP: 0.5304 RPI: 0.573 GD: 20
11 Dallas Texans (9-5-1) PCT: 0.6333 OPP: 0.563 OPOP: 0.53 RPI: 0.5723 GD: 3
12 Midwest United FC (8-2-3) PCT: 0.7308 OPP: 0.5179 OPOP: 0.509 RPI: 0.5689 GD: 22
13 Crossfire Premier (9-3-3) PCT: 0.7 OPP: 0.5123 OPOP: 0.5088 RPI: 0.5583 GD: 21
14 Sockers FC (8-1-5) PCT: 0.75 OPP: 0.4666 OPOP: 0.5116 RPI: 0.5487 GD: 16
15 San Diego Surf (8-3-5) PCT: 0.6563 OPP: 0.4988 OPOP: 0.5104 RPI: 0.5411 GD: 10
16 Real Colorado (7-5-2) PCT: 0.5714 OPP: 0.5326 OPOP: 0.5276 RPI: 0.5411 GD: 5
17 Utah Royals FC- Arizona (9-6-2) PCT: 0.5882 OPP: 0.528 OPOP: 0.5132 RPI: 0.5394 GD: 8
18 So Cal Blues Soccer Club (11-6-6) PCT: 0.6087 OPP: 0.515 OPOP: 0.5084 RPI: 0.5368 GD: 11
19 California Thorns FC (8-6-4) PCT: 0.5556 OPP: 0.5287 OPOP: 0.5239 RPI: 0.5342 GD: -2
20 New York City FC (10-3-1) PCT: 0.75 OPP: 0.4494 OPOP: 0.4833 RPI: 0.533 GD: 30
21 LA Galaxy San Diego (9-8-4) PCT: 0.5238 OPP: 0.5412 OPOP: 0.5218 RPI: 0.532 GD: 1
22 United Futbol Academy (7-9-0) PCT: 0.4375 OPP: 0.5848 OPOP: 0.5117 RPI: 0.5297 GD: -15
23 OC Surf Soccer Club (7-8-2) PCT: 0.4706 OPP: 0.5697 OPOP: 0.5039 RPI: 0.5285 GD: -1
24 San Jose Earthquakes (6-7-5) PCT: 0.4722 OPP: 0.5657 OPOP: 0.5068 RPI: 0.5276 GD: 1
25 Cincinnati Development Academy (9-4-1) PCT: 0.6786 OPP: 0.4524 OPOP: 0.5118 RPI: 0.5238 GD: 17
26 Nationals (8-5-2) PCT: 0.6 OPP: 0.4904 OPOP: 0.4952 RPI: 0.519 GD: 17
27 FC United Soccer Club (7-3-3) PCT: 0.6538 OPP: 0.446 OPOP: 0.5184 RPI: 0.5161 GD: 2
28 SC del Sol (7-9-6) PCT: 0.4545 OPP: 0.5461 OPOP: 0.5112 RPI: 0.5145 GD: -1
29 Reign Academy (5-4-6) PCT: 0.5333 OPP: 0.509 OPOP: 0.4909 RPI: 0.5106 GD: 4
30 Oakwood Soccer Club (9-5-0) PCT: 0.6429 OPP: 0.4497 OPOP: 0.4749 RPI: 0.5043 GD: 25
31 FC Fury NY (7-5-1) PCT: 0.5769 OPP: 0.4769 OPOP: 0.4706 RPI: 0.5003 GD: 9
32 NEFC (7-6-2) PCT: 0.5333 OPP: 0.4957 OPOP: 0.4691 RPI: 0.4985 GD: 4
33 Michigan Jaguars FC (4-6-4) PCT: 0.4286 OPP: 0.5302 OPOP: 0.487 RPI: 0.494 GD: -6
34 LA Galaxy (6-8-3) PCT: 0.4412 OPP: 0.4973 OPOP: 0.5082 RPI: 0.486 GD: -4
35 IMG Academy (7-6-3) PCT: 0.5313 OPP: 0.4555 OPOP: 0.4888 RPI: 0.4828 GD: 9
36 Real So Cal (8-6-3) PCT: 0.5588 OPP: 0.4298 OPOP: 0.5061 RPI: 0.4811 GD: 8
37 La Roca Futbol Club (5-7-4) PCT: 0.4375 OPP: 0.4965 OPOP: 0.4891 RPI: 0.4799 GD: -4
38 FC Virginia (6-7-3) PCT: 0.4688 OPP: 0.475 OPOP: 0.4961 RPI: 0.4787 GD: -2
39 Sporting Omaha (4-9-0) PCT: 0.3077 OPP: 0.5406 OPOP: 0.5141 RPI: 0.4757 GD: -19
40 Los Angeles Premier Futbol Club (5-8-2) PCT: 0.4 OPP: 0.4954 OPOP: 0.4873 RPI: 0.4695 GD: -10
41 Sky Blue - NYSC (7-5-1) PCT: 0.5769 OPP: 0.4078 OPOP: 0.4807 RPI: 0.4683 GD: 24
42 Eagles Soccer Club (4-10-3) PCT: 0.3235 OPP: 0.5174 OPOP: 0.4971 RPI: 0.4639 GD: -5
43 CSA Impact (3-8-3) PCT: 0.3214 OPP: 0.5225 OPOP: 0.4754 RPI: 0.4604 GD: -11
44 Lamorinda Soccer Club (4-8-5) PCT: 0.3824 OPP: 0.477 OPOP: 0.4894 RPI: 0.4565 GD: -12
45 South Florida Football Academy (3-6-5) PCT: 0.3929 OPP: 0.4671 OPOP: 0.4936 RPI: 0.4552 GD: -7
46 Placer United Soccer Club (6-9-2) PCT: 0.4118 OPP: 0.4498 OPOP: 0.4889 RPI: 0.4501 GD: -12
47 Houston Dash (4-12-1) PCT: 0.2647 OPP: 0.4959 OPOP: 0.5185 RPI: 0.4438 GD: -20
48 Colorado Rush (2-12-0) PCT: 0.1429 OPP: 0.5535 OPOP: 0.5164 RPI: 0.4415 GD: -47
49 Cedar Stars Academy - Monmouth (4-5-1) PCT: 0.45 OPP: 0.4237 OPOP: 0.4663 RPI: 0.4409 GD: 2
50 PA Classics (3-4-3) PCT: 0.45 OPP: 0.4149 OPOP: 0.481 RPI: 0.4402 GD: 7
51 Pateadores (5-11-4) PCT: 0.35 OPP: 0.4479 OPOP: 0.5076 RPI: 0.4383 GD: -13
52 West Florida Flames (3-8-5) PCT: 0.3438 OPP: 0.4477 OPOP: 0.4878 RPI: 0.4317 GD: -17
53 Portland Thorns FC (3-9-4) PCT: 0.3125 OPP: 0.4537 OPOP: 0.483 RPI: 0.4258 GD: -13
54 Oklahoma Energy FC (4-13-0) PCT: 0.2353 OPP: 0.4661 OPOP: 0.5307 RPI: 0.4245 GD: -36
55 Albion SC (4-13-2) PCT: 0.2632 OPP: 0.4672 OPOP: 0.4827 RPI: 0.42 GD: -24
56 Shattuck - St. Mary's (1-15-1) PCT: 0.0882 OPP: 0.5471 OPOP: 0.4763 RPI: 0.4147 GD: -44
57 Weston FC (4-9-3) PCT: 0.3438 OPP: 0.4093 OPOP: 0.4893 RPI: 0.4129 GD: -23
58 Seacoast United (3-9-1) PCT: 0.2692 OPP: 0.4601 OPOP: 0.4589 RPI: 0.4121 GD: -14
59 FC Albertson Fury (2-10-1) PCT: 0.1923 OPP: 0.4539 OPOP: 0.4575 RPI: 0.3894 GD: -31
60 Empire United (1-11-2) PCT: 0.1429 OPP: 0.4639 OPOP: 0.4331 RPI: 0.376 GD: -59
61 United Soccer Alliance (2-9-2) PCT: 0.2308 OPP: 0.408 OPOP: 0.4543 RPI: 0.3753 GD: -21
62 Washington Spirit Academy - Maryland (1-8-1) PCT: 0.15 OPP: 0.4157 OPOP: 0.4521 RPI: 0.3584 GD: -25
63 Washington Spirit Academy - Virginia (0-12-1) PCT: 0.0385 OPP: 0.4408 OPOP: 0.4545 RPI: 0.3436 GD: -45
64 Arlington Soccer Association (1-2-0) PCT: 0.3333 OPP: 0.2123 OPOP: 0.4463 RPI: 0.3011 GD: -3

All SW division teams highlighted in red

Division Average RPI Rankings
1 Frontier - Central Division 0.5311
2 Southwest - West Division 0.5115
3 Mid-America - Central Division 0.5057
4 Southeast - East Division 0.5019
5 Northwest - West Division 0.4929
6 Northeast - East Division 0.4602
7 Atlantic - East Division 0.4220
Click to expand...

Extreme goal differential might be more a product of the competition than anything else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top