Your playing a one sided card game.
Im across the table.
2017-2018 D1 Women's Soccer Talk!
- Thread starter gkrent
- Start date
Im across the table.
I asked you earlier about rights, and you didnt respond.
I moved on, and this was a snippet on state politics. I didnt get into constitutional ramifications, but if you believe traditional public restrooms are unconstitutional, please explain.
Or you can just be content with labeling me as a bigot and we can end this now.
chargerfan
GOLD
In my world, a person who uses the term "tranny" doesn't even get a seat at the table. You can either find some enlightenment, or remain by yourself in the dark ages. Have a good day.
Now back to soccer!
chargerfan
GOLD
Where you tell me where you got your law degree, we can have an educated conversation on the subject. Otherwise, I have the feeling it will be a waste of my time.
I dont have a law degree.
I dont have a HS diploma either, so I guess we're done.
NoGoal
DA
I hear Santa Clara is dangerous this year!
I didnt mean it in a disparaging way.
I guess its better to call someone a bigot.
I agree.
Soccer
MakeAPlay
DA
Come on Bernie. There is a law still on the books in Georgia that bans oral sex. Booze was once banned. If we are going to put our faith in the lowest common denominator then we are in for some serious problems. If we were to go with what is popular my player wouldn't even exist. Have a heart. I know a wonderful woman that had to have the national guard escort her to class in elementary school due to the unpopularity of forced integration. Unfortunately for all of us "separate but equal" was popular. Popular and extremely flawed.
"Identity politics" seems to be the theme of the week. What do you mean by that?
MakeAPlay
DA
Hedge and Sanchez along with Gonzalez are going to be tough. JD will start at outside back for them. I think that Turnbow will be their first attacking player off the bench.
I have a big heart.
I just disagree with the bathroom boycott.
You can call me a bigot.
I dont really care.
chargerfan
GOLD
This is why the constitution is the law of the land, and not the will of the majority. Equal Protection for minority groups, even if the majority wants to oppress them. Brown and Obergefell two historic examples of this.
chargerfan
GOLD
You said yourself you would be unhappy if your gay daughter wasn't allowed to play on her high school team due to her sexuality. This is actually a law in the books in KY, not hypothetical. I'm sure you would also be unhappy if she were not allowed to adopt a child, which is not allowed in many states. The list goes on and on for basic rights denied to them.
Just like I am sure you have boycotted a product for doing something you disagree with, the state govt has every right to boycott as well. It's the only way to get these other states attention, and let them know we find their actions unconstitutional and unamerican. Hit em where it hurts- $$$.
How do traditional restrooms where men stand up, and women sit down, "oppress" people?
This is what we are talking about.
Not Jim Crow.
Not dogs and firehoses.
Not segregated schools.
What does the law say?
Can you show it to me?
chargerfan
GOLD
You are forcing them to prove their gender in order to perform a basic bodily function, which is an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. Would you like the gender police to check your junk before entering a restroom? Don't you think you'd find it oppressive?
I think you have things mixed up.
The adoption law protects the rights of religious organizations from being forced to allow an adoption from their organization.
It does not outlaw gay couples from adopting kids from other organizations.
Nobody is doing that.
We both agreed, that if nobody knows, who cares.
The law is there to protect people from predators. If a guy is using a gender neutral bathroom law as an excuse to use the women's room, whats to stop him?