Yet! You will find your peace and your love for God after this is over. This is the Great Awakening. I'm starting to better understand you and many of my non-religious friends.
Yeah, the foundational strength of the Constitution is only bettered by its flexibility based on the make up for SCOTUS. The clairvoyance of the originalists is definitely spiritual in nature, with them knowing exactly what was intended by individuals 200+ years ago! I suppose the divine who inspired it must also be white (3/5ths) and male (women couldn't vote) too. I take it that the 27 amendments were equally divinely inspired. Who'd a thunk it!
Hopefully he got paid. I guess being the lousy mayor of 100k people somehow qualifies you to be the secretary of transportation. Oh wait, maybe THAT was the payoff. A real job. For which he thanked us by doing a real shitty job. While ships sat out in in the ocean and just stared at our ports for weeks, Mayor Bootygig was taking paternity leave because his husband had such a difficult pregnan... uh, ADOPTION.
Thats what i think
The majority of SCOTUS decisions are unanimous. You couldn't get 9 other people together to reach an unanimous opinions on anything. The Constitution and SCOTUS work well as designed. Complaining about SCOTUS is just sour grapes.
Don't forget about when he "rode" his bike to work. What a clown show.
I believe that story turned out to be false.
bike... Mike... what's the difference?
That's a misconception. The majority being unanimous happened twice between 2008-2019. The average for unanimous was 48% in that period.
It's tasty wine from the best grapes in the world win SCOTUS rules in favor of the Dems. However, when the Dems lose, it's sour grapes. These people are the biggest babies I have ever met. They have to win everything, or they will cheat and lie and then wine like spoiled brats. I know the right does it as well, but you don't hear the right say after a big defeat, "we need to pack the court to cheat." This is the system we have. I'm open to new ideas but not the ideas of radical kid groomers!
Maybe when you have a jurist that can't even define what a woman is, it makes it harder to reach consensus on more complicated issues.
You're better than that
Really, that's all you have? I could have said the same thing about you quoting a 30 year old film major on how abuse of taxes works. Instead, I laid out why she was wrong and didn't understand the subject matter.
Jackson was appointed to SCOTUS in 2022, all my examples above are prior to that ... hence my comment, i.e. you "blamed" the one current justice who wasn't there for any of those decisions.
Fair point, but I didn't blame her for anything. Really just generally trying to point out (maybe inarticulately) that SCOTUS works great as designed and that originalists aren't a problem, or at least no more of an issue than the "liberalists" on the Court (for lack of a better term). You cherry picked a time period to say the court agreeing on decisions is a misconception. Factually the conservatives are more "agreeable" than the liberals on the court. With 3 conservatives (some that have been accused of "orginalism") voting 80% with the 3 liberals, more so than the other conservatives, I'd say that's effectively a bi-partisan court. Despite this fact the is Left is crying about the Right packing the court and threatening to expand it.
cnsmaryland.org
Strangely enough I received a malware alert for the site you referenced ... so won't be going there. I did a quick search and got the results I got, which were historic, but not purposefully cherry picked - I think we've interacted enough for you to know I don't cherry pick.Fair point, but I didn't blame her for anything. Really just generally trying to point out (maybe inarticulately) that SCOTUS works great as designed and that originalists aren't a problem, or at least no more of an issue than the "liberalists" on the Court (for lack of a better term). You cherry picked a time period to say the court agreeing on decisions is a misconception. Factually the conservatives are more "agreeable" than the liberals on the court. With 3 conservatives (some that have been accused of "orginalism") voting 80% with the 3 liberals, more so than the other conservatives, I'd say that's effectively a bi-partisan court. Despite this fact the is Left is crying about the Right packing the court and threatening to expand it.
Here is some current data on the court which shows 75% unanimity:
Amid controversy, Supreme Court shows surprising unanimity in most rulings – so far
As the 2023-2024 Supreme Court term nears its end, data reflects historic unanimity among the justices, although a number of potentially divisive cases are to be decided in the coming weeks.
Do I philosophically disagree with the Courts decision on Roe v. Wade. Very much so, but I think there was reasonable legal basis to do so. Even RGB questioned the legal basis of RvW, although it was overturned for other reasons than RGB cited.
What a coincidence... you would think a Supreme Court justice would be hired for more than racist, sexist reasons, too, but I guess neither she nor the democrats are better than that.
That's why the killers of kids hate SCOTUS and want to pack the court so they can have the Feds support the killing fields of kids. So sad how messed people like you are.
Maybe your malware has "not an approved narrative" blocker...just kidding. I doubled checked the website before posting and it said it was a wire service based out of the University of Maryland. When my computer crashes today, at least I will know the reason. I probably shouldn't be doing non work related searches on my work computer.
It's amazing to me how important abortion is to democrats. It's far and away their #1 talking point. If even HALF that energy was put towards improving the adoption process or, God forbid, personal responsibility with contraception advancements...
