Vaccine

Yeah, tell that to the face of someone who actually has heart inflammation. You should try standing in someone else's shoes, it might give you a different perspective.

Similar argument --

Air travel is the safest method of transportation, with 0.07 deaths every billion passenger-miles.

Watfly-like response -- "Try telling that to the families of the 9/11 airplanes"
 
Similar argument --

Air travel is the safest method of transportation, with 0.07 deaths every billion passenger-miles.

Watfly-like response -- "Try telling that to the families of the 9/11 airplanes"
Yeah, well I would never tell the family that lost a family member in an airplane crash that "sorry Joe died, but you know air travel is really safe". So no, your example is not remotely similar.
 
No he is just another provocateur making a buck by giving half truths and lies the same credence as fact without vetting. Quacks and snake oil salesmen have always been pointed out so the naive and uncultured can see the error in their ways. Yet some will always continue to cling to their hopes.
Your ignorance of the subject is showing again.
 
No he is just another provocateur making a buck by giving half truths and lies the same credence as fact without vetting. Quacks and snake oil salesmen have always been pointed out so the naive and uncultured can see the error in their ways. Yet some will always continue to cling to their hopes.
So what would you recommend? Censorship of opinion speech? Disclaimers or labeling on these shows? If so, who would determine what qualifies as half-truths and opinion...Tipper Gore?

Keep in mind that the vaccine was sold as stopping infection and ending the pandemic by the President, some "mainstream" pundits and many in the scientific community. So there has been some half-truths involved with it. How should we handle that? Is it OK to lie in the name of "caution"?

I think you're wanting to fix stupid, which I can appreciate, but I lean more to Darwin doing that than our government.
 
So what would you recommend? Censorship of opinion speech? Disclaimers or labeling on these shows? If so, who would determine what qualifies as half-truths and opinion...Tipper Gore?

Keep in mind that the vaccine was sold as stopping infection and ending the pandemic by the President, some "mainstream" pundits and many in the scientific community. So there has been some half-truths involved with it. How should we handle that? Is it OK to lie in the name of "caution"?

I think you're wanting to fix stupid, which I can appreciate, but I lean more to Darwin doing that than our government.

The Darwin solution will eventually work, but don't try telling that to the families of those who die because of depending on it.
 
The heart conditions cited are mild and temporary.
mild and temporary , children, omicron. see how that works? Old = get vaccinated, healthy and young = nope.

jury is still out on heart inflamation. VAERS is likley undereported and data is still relatively immature. Maybe it turns out to be nothing, maybe it does. Risk/benefit is the answer. Why would you boost a healthy, vaccinated child? Why were they vaccinated in the first place???Parent's choice (their choice to make).
 
mild and temporary , children, omicron. see how that works? Old = get vaccinated, healthy and young = nope.

jury is still out on heart inflamation. VAERS is likley undereported and data is still relatively immature. Maybe it turns out to be nothing, maybe it does. Risk/benefit is the answer. Why would you boost a healthy, vaccinated child? Why were they vaccinated in the first place???Parent's choice (their choice to make).
Watch this bro

 
The Darwin solution will eventually work, but don't try telling that to the families of those who die because of depending on it.
so dramatic. What is he saying that is killing people? The Darwin solution? Funny...I would guess that most people who routinley listen to Rogan have the intellectual capacity to discern what he is saying. I would also guess that the majority of his guests are vaccinated, even the "quacks".

I do love how he is in everyone's head. Must be the highpoint of his career - a sternly worded letter written about him.
 
so dramatic. What is he saying that is killing people? The Darwin solution? Funny...I would guess that most people who routinley listen to Rogan have the intellectual capacity to discern what he is saying. I would also guess that the majority of his guests are vaccinated, even the "quacks".

I do love how he is in everyone's head. Must be the highpoint of his career - a sternly worded letter written about him.

I was just following watfly's lead on how to frame a rebuttal.
 
You are quite correct - happens at both ends of the candle. At least Rogan doesn't advocate for one or the other. Of course he has opinions, everyone does. He presents to you information so you can make a decision. Nice to have choices. Funny that all of the "quacks" he's had on his show are fully vaccinated. I haven't seen/heard most of his guests but I haven't seen where anyone has said don't get vaccinated if you are vulnerable. Maybe I'm wrong. This mass hysteria over Rogan is just generating more followers - people discovering that he has guests that provide value added beyond vaccine hysteria. Spotify is grinning ear to ear.
“Mass hysteria”? Lol! Pointing out a con man or a snake oil salesman is hardly hysteria. There are many of those on the right, the ones who attempt such things on the left get ferreted out quickly, see Micheal Avanatti.
 
So what would you recommend? Censorship of opinion speech? Disclaimers or labeling on these shows? If so, who would determine what qualifies as half-truths and opinion...Tipper Gore?

Keep in mind that the vaccine was sold as stopping infection and ending the pandemic by the President, some "mainstream" pundits and many in the scientific community. So there has been some half-truths involved with it. How should we handle that? Is it OK to lie in the name of "caution"?

I think you're wanting to fix stupid, which I can appreciate, but I lean more to Darwin doing that than our government.
Not suggesting a thing. Just pointing out the hypocrisy and stupidity of those citing his “revelations”.
 
“Mass hysteria”? Lol! Pointing out a con man or a snake oil salesman is hardly hysteria. There are many of those on the right, the ones who attempt such things on the left get ferreted out quickly, see Micheal Avanatti.

terrible example ,Avenatti was 86”d because of his legal issues . Many people mentioned he was a total grifter , low life from the start , while CNN was wondering if he was a viable presidential candidate

Avenatti was not ferreted out quickly
 
“Mass hysteria”? Lol! Pointing out a con man or a snake oil salesman is hardly hysteria. There are many of those on the right, the ones who attempt such things on the left get ferreted out quickly, see Micheal Avanatti.
Your obsession with Rogan is quite interesting. What exactly is he selling "from the right"? Is he a fringy right wing kinda guy? I thought he was: pro weed, pro choice, pro obama, pro clinton, pro more government spending on stuff for people? Sounds pretty traditional leftie to me. I kinda miss those traditional lefties.

I guess now he's a crazy right winger because he allows people on his show who aren't 100% advocating for mass vaccination, crazy mandates, lockdowns.? Craziness! To think that anyone would question government overeach is just nuts!
 
Not suggesting a thing. Just pointing out the hypocrisy and stupidity of those citing his “revelations”.
Weird that when others point out hypocrisy and stupidity, you claim its whining. And in contrast to you, others are pointing out solutions. At least we all have the choice not to listen to Rogan and his guest opinions and line his pockets. You have to track Rogan down to listen to his opinions whereas you could accidently turn on the wrong channel and listen to Joy Reid spew racist comments.
 
Your obsession with Rogan is quite interesting. What exactly is he selling "from the right"? Is he a fringy right wing kinda guy? I thought he was: pro weed, pro choice, pro obama, pro clinton, pro more government spending on stuff for people? Sounds pretty traditional leftie to me. I kinda miss those traditional lefties.

I guess now he's a crazy right winger because he allows people on his show who aren't 100% advocating for mass vaccination, crazy mandates, lockdowns.? Craziness! To think that anyone would question government overeach is just nuts!
1642455266423.png
 
Back
Top