I don't have a horse in this race and am genuinely curious as to how player pools will pan out. If that golden-ticket number is something like 5 players per age group that's a tough pill to swallow for those players that are #6 - 10 where the difference in talent between player #7 (could be booted down to team B) and player #5 (holds golden ticket) is razor thin. I would guess that the magic number for players guaranteed A team roster spot at all times would be a bit higher? Maybe 10?
At Surf, it is more like 13-14 core players on the ECNL and 6-8 “floater” players that theoretically move between the A and B teams. Whether you like it or not, this is the future for the girls as they age up to a more competitive level. High school, college and pro teams are all “pool play” so get used to it. Furthermore, at the pro level, there are no age brackets hindering who can be on the team. The best and most prepared players suit up for the match. Deza and staff at Surf are just prepping/preparing these girls for the future. IMO other clubs will follow this template. Has Surf lost a few floater players to other clubs where they can go start on an ECNL team? Yes they have. Yet more and more numbers come out to test themselves and attempt to make the top team. At the same time, the ECRL team strengthens too. Darwinism at its finest.
Surf, like it’s main So Cal competitors LAFC, Blues, Legends (would-have said Albion 2 years ago) strives to be a top national club. Moving towards this professional template is the future. Sorry, but you don’t hear any of the established A team ECNL players complaining. They know they have to push themselves—all of them do continuous outside the club private training weekly. Pool play is here to stay.