Wrong. Clubs were trying to come back to ECNL after the first year. The reason DA clubs like LAFC/Slammers got two teams was because they already had two teams (one in ECNL and one in DA). So to go back to all in ECNL they would have lost about 5-6 good teams as they would have been combined into only one team. By giving them two teams the DA team slides in as one team and the ECNL team stays in tact. This way the club does not lose money by losing 5-6 of their better teams.No I don't' agree with that at all. What I'm saying is the DA leadership thought they could just say we're US Soccer and we don't have to adjust to customer feedback. I remember the Real Colorado DOC saying something along the lines that all things equal they will stay DA but give us two teams in each age group we will come back to ECNL. If ECNL was the most desirable product why give top clubs incentives to come back? It was good business of ECNL to do that to bring back clubs but it doesn't mean the product was the best. In fact it shows that they had go above and beyond to compete with DA. There were plenty of positives about DA and it could have been even better if they made the necessary adjustments.
What you said previously is that if DA copied ECNL rules they would have won out. So if DA replicated what ECNL was offering they would have won in your opinion. Of course that is because the assumption is that US Soccer backing would win out. I don't necessarily disagree with that. But ECNL has been strong for over a decade, and in the end they did win out. Their product offering was better than US Soccer's.
