The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

What part of Brennans job at CNN requires the kind of clearance that was revoked?

I have advised you before that you usually stumble when you go out on your own trying to look like an authority. You're better off just quoting stuff that you like from FEE.
 
Interesting since you're not that much older than I am...
Facts are facts...as folks age they lose filters that make allow them to be considered civil
One persons "attack" is another's discussion.
What one describes as an attack maybe their arrogant inability to have civil conversation...
:cool:
Irony personified . . . yet again.
 
The specifics must include long established rules regarding a "need to know". Once you leave your government position, you no longer have "need to know" access to do your job at CNN. Please continue. Too bad you didn't "pull back just in time" before making yourself look stupid.
E is the King of that.. and he still hasn't found it.
 
Your opinion is of little value because you are ____________.

It is just as offensive to fill that blank with "old" as it is filling it with black, brown, Jewish, Muslim, gay or female.
Are you that desperate that you can't come up with your own ideas for a post? At least give credit where credit is due if you're gonna steal another posters idea..
 
Your opinion is of little value because you are ____________.

It is just as offensive to fill that blank with "old" as it is filling it with black, brown, Jewish, Muslim, gay or female.
Who said your opinion is of little value?
I said as people age they lose their filters...you've changed that to something entirely different...which is where the delusion comes in...
 
Who said your opinion is of little value?
I said as people age they lose their filters...you've changed that to something entirely different...which is where the delusion comes in...

Worse than bigots are those who try to weasel away from their own bigoted actions.
 
I have advised you before that you usually stumble when you go out on your own trying to look like an authority. You're better off just quoting stuff that you like from FEE.
Lol!! Watching you trying to weasel out of telling us how Brennanʻs current job at CNN requires a security clearance is classic espola.
 
Your opinion is of little value because you are ____________.

It is just as offensive to fill that blank with "old" as it is filling it with black, brown, Jewish, Muslim, gay or female.
There is a distinct lack of self-awareness amongst the nutter crowd.
 
I am no longer astonished by your ignorant comments and inability to answer why Brennan still requires clearance.

Ignoramus.

Senior military and intelligence officials often keep their clearances active after retirement. It allows the government to call them in quickly for consultations or questions without going through the labor of re-activating the clearance.

Also - having that clearance is a desirable resume item, and thus may have real monetary value to the retiree.

Also - the final assignments of such senior officials usually entail being exposed to some secrets that are best kept secret, at least for the near future. The active clearance gives the security officials some leverage toward the individual.

Brennan did nothing to violate any security regulations. Revoking his clearance was a petty act by the criminal in the WH who was pissed at how accurately Brennan was poking at him.
 
Ignoramus.

Senior military and intelligence officials often keep their clearances active after retirement. It allows the government to call them in quickly for consultations or questions without going through the labor of re-activating the clearance.

Also - having that clearance is a desirable resume item, and thus may have real monetary value to the retiree.

Also - the final assignments of such senior officials usually entail being exposed to some secrets that are best kept secret, at least for the near future. The active clearance gives the security officials some leverage toward the individual.

Brennan did nothing to violate any security regulations. Revoking his clearance was a petty act by the criminal in the WH who was pissed at how accurately Brennan was poking at him.
Desirable resume item??? Yes Iʻm sure CNN finds it a desirable resume item. Lol!! Like I said, your ignorance no longer astonishes me. Revoking his clearance could very well be petty but still does not explain why he needs continued clearance at the level he once held as CIA director. Further, if you think that Brennan is such a valuable asset for the Mueller investigation why would restoring clearance be so labourious? But please, continue.
 
Desirable resume item??? Yes Iʻm sure CNN finds it a desirable resume item. Lol!! Like I said, your ignorance no longer astonishes me. Revoking his clearance could very well be petty but still does not explain why he needs continued clearance at the level he once held as CIA director. Further, if you think that Brennan is such a valuable asset for the Mueller investigation why would restoring clearance be so labourious? But please, continue.

His clearance has nothing to do with CNN.
 
Ignoramus.

Senior military and intelligence officials often keep their clearances active after retirement. It allows the government to call them in quickly for consultations or questions without going through the labor of re-activating the clearance.

Also - having that clearance is a desirable resume item, and thus may have real monetary value to the retiree.

Also - the final assignments of such senior officials usually entail being exposed to some secrets that are best kept secret, at least for the near future. The active clearance gives the security officials some leverage toward the individual.

Brennan did nothing to violate any security regulations. Revoking his clearance was a petty act by the criminal in the WH who was pissed at how accurately Brennan was poking at him.
We elected Trump to blow up the swamp.
We dont need these people grifting and politicizing their unentitled entitlements.
get it?
No, you do not.
 
Back
Top