Probably no intent to harm. But definitely intent to commit a foul at this age.
As a ref, shouldn't you call a foul as a foul regardless of what outcome it may have on the game or whether it may cause harm? As a ref, do you go into a U8/U9 game thinking that you won't have to blow your whistle since the fouls are harmless/don't affect the outcome of the game?
@rainbow_unicorn, that is an excellent question. To the first question ... "regardless of outcome" the answer is no. To the second ... "U8 harmless" ... the answer again is no as
@baldref stated so very succinctly. Here is why:
There are basically 4 levels of fouls:
1) Trifling ... a foul that is a foul but we are not calling it because it was relatively insignificant and there is not negative impact on the fouled team and calling it would disrupt the flow of the game. Generally, a player that just lost a little control of their body and didn't intend any harm and there was no negative impact on the foulee team.
2) Careless ... a foul that we can whistle, but may let the play continue because of advantage. Most fouls fall into this category.
3) Reckless ... now its getting serious, the player deserves a yellow. Played the ball too late or too early. Here is where the shit hits the proverbial fan for parents. A U8 player has less control of their body, far less experience and far less intent to be an A-Hole. As refs, we have to judge the intent of the player to determine reckless ... little Johnny the 10 year old commits a foul that we are going to probably view as "careless," where as, John the 20 year old should know better that slide tackling from the blind side was reckless.
4) Excessive ... now we are on the final level. Player didn't play the ball, but played the player or were just flat out -- out of control. This is not soccer, but BS thuggery. Red card. Is little Johnny the 10 year old capable of this? Possibly (really depends on their parents and home life), but there are plenty of 20 year olds that are. The exception here is DOGSO where a Red Card may be issued because of the rules and not being an AHole (note, however, that we have much more latitude now on DOGSO).
So, U8's get more leeway because they get the benefit of the doubt because very view U8's are reckless, but just careless. U14's and up are starting to develop, have more body control and their fouls rise to the level of reckless and excessive.
On this note, last year I warned a U10 Presidio AA-C kid that kicked at the ball late and tripped the kid ... foul and warning (the kid was near tears and apologized). The week prior I yellow carded a U12 kid for the same exact move on a SCDSL Flight 1 team (the kid smirked, accepted it and went back to defend). Age and skill level play directly into the evaluation of whether the foul was trifling, careless, reckless or excessive.
So in conclusion ... no and no.