The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

#METUTU
mrz071418dAPR20180713114507.jpg


derp'
 
What if Obama agreed to be more flexible after the election on a hot mic?
...oh wait, that actually happened.

Not sure how to respond. It kinda seems like your saying since Obama had a hot mic slip up and that means now Trump is beyond any sort of reproach or accountability? lol good grief, if he didn't know what he was getting into when he took the job then boy is he in trouble.
We joke with each other about sheeple; but if that "well Obama" stuff resonates with you- you might just be a sheeple.
 
Last edited:
Not sure how to respond. It kinda seems like your saying since Obama had a hot mic slip up and that means now Trump is beyond any sort of reproach or accountability? lol good grief, if he didn't know what he was getting into when he took the job then boy is he in trouble.
We joke with each other about sheeple; but if that "well Obama" stuff resonates with you- you might just be a sheeple.
No, what Im saying is that Obama's "hot mic" moment actually happened.
You're so tangled up in tds "what if" scenarios, you cant delineate reality from conspiracy theory.
 
No, what Im saying is that Obama's "hot mic" moment actually happened.
You're so tangled up in tds "what if" scenarios, you cant delineate reality from conspiracy theory.

Conspiracy threory? If only it were so easy to dismiss.

Multiple high level officials involved in Trumps campaign and in White House have been uncovered as illicitly receiving funds from oligarch while working for Trump. My read is once they found a half dozen of them, that the conversation goes from conspiracy theory, to good gawd they really have embedded themselves in Trumps inner circle.
 
Conspiracy threory? If only it were so easy to dismiss.

Multiple high level officials involved in Trumps campaign and in White House have been uncovered as illicitly receiving funds from oligarch while working for Trump. My read is once they found a half dozen of them, that the conversation goes from conspiracy theory, to good gawd they really have embedded themselves in Trumps inner circle.
You may want to get your facts straight.
 
Conspiracy threory? If only it were so easy to dismiss.

Multiple high level officials involved in Trumps campaign and in White House have been uncovered as illicitly receiving funds from oligarch while working for Trump. My read is once they found a half dozen of them, that the conversation goes from conspiracy theory, to good gawd they really have embedded themselves in Trumps inner circle.

lets start with these "facts" first.
 
Goodnight Trumplesthinskin...
Goodnight Paulie Timesup...
And Goodnight to many, dems, reps and socialists, who are also gonna get hit by this buckshot. There are some surprises coming... It's gonna be fun!
Goodnight moon...
Goodnight cow jumping over the moon...
 
lets start with these "facts" first.

Well fivethirtyeight.com just listed them out. I've cut and pasted it down below, and think the hyper links still work if you want to talk about sources or anyone in particular. And I cut and pasted a few of my favorite lines here at the top. I know this is inconvenient for you to believe, but this isn't going away. Even if Dems don't have the numbers to impeach, this is going to be an anchor on his administration.


"It’s a large number considering that the investigation has been active for only 14 months. So far, Mueller has filed charges against five American, one Dutch and 26 Russian nationals, along with three Russian businesses. Of all those indicted, five people have pleaded guilty"

"Friday’s charges are perhaps most important because they add compelling evidence to the claim that the Russian government engaged in a coordinated effort to hack U.S. servers — a contention that had been disputed by Trump and some of his allies"


https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-mueller-investigation-keeps-growing-fast/amp/

It’s a large number considering that the investigation has been active for only 14 months. So far, Mueller has filed charges against five American, one Dutch and 26 Russian nationals, along with three Russian businesses. Of all those indicted, five people have pleaded guilty — including one who has already served prison time — and Paul Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, is awaiting trial. (The charges against him are related to his lobbying work, not election interference.) Our analysis of special counsel investigations going back to Watergate shows that a majority ended without charges being filed against anyone, while others took years to produce indictments. Mueller is still working quickly compared with past investigations.

This is the second batch of Russians who have been indicted and accused of meddling with the 2016 elections in the U.S.: In February, the Justice Department filed charges against 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies in connection with a painstaking online campaign to undermine the 2016 election and support the Trump campaign.

Friday’s charges are perhaps most important because they add compelling evidence to the claim that the Russian government engaged in a coordinated effort to hack U.S. servers — a contention that had been disputed by Trump and some of his allies. And although the indictments allege that someone close to the Trump campaign was in “regular contact” with one of the Russian hackers, we still don’t know whether members of the Trump campaign committed a crime by seeking or using the documents stolen by the Russians. The indictment also alleges that the hacked materials were seen as an opportunity for others, including an unnamed candidate for Congress who requested stolen documents about his or her opponent. In his statement, Rosenstein emphasized that the indictment does not, however, suggest that the hacking “affected any election result.”

These indictments are largely symbolic. It will be nearly impossible for Mueller’s team to compel any of the Russians to stand trial in the U.S., and although the indictments could cause trouble if the accused have U.S.-based business dealings, February’s indictments suggest that court appearances by the newly charged people will be unlikely: Of all the Russian people and entities charged in February, only one Russian company has sent a representative to defend itself in a U.S. court.

The timing of Rosenstein’s announcement will likely have consequences, though. Rather than holding specific people accountable for their role in the hacking, the indictments may serve a larger geopolitical purpose: alerting the Russians to the fact that the U.S. government understands the extent of their interference in a major election. Trump, who according to Rosenstein was told about the indictments in advance, will have an opportunity to reinforce that message to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s face next week, when the two leaders meet in Helsinki. Rosenstein certainly gave them plenty to talk about.
 
Goodnight Paulie SonofErick...
Goodnight all the folks who voted against gun control that are named Bernie...
Goodnight Paulie Nobail...
Goodnight Russky Rubles... wherever they may fall...
Goodnight moon.

"Graduate studies" - is that what they call it these days? Heheheheheee...
 
Trump is Krushing It! on Hannity.

Compares Paulie Nobail to Al Capone! That will get Paulie FREE AT LAST!!! Go Trumpski! Go!!

Kekistan will be free!
 
Putin doesnt give a shit.
You people are chasing your tail, and the rest of us are trying our best to ignore the spectacle and enjoy the positive direction our country is finally on again.
Its getting old, the hysterical pissing and bitching.
Take a Midol and relax. The grown ups are back in charge.
You are one brainwashed mofo.
 
Well fivethirtyeight.com just listed them out. I've cut and pasted it down below, and think the hyper links still work if you want to talk about sources or anyone in particular. And I cut and pasted a few of my favorite lines here at the top. I know this is inconvenient for you to believe, but this isn't going away. Even if Dems don't have the numbers to impeach, this is going to be an anchor on his administration.


"It’s a large number considering that the investigation has been active for only 14 months. So far, Mueller has filed charges against five American, one Dutch and 26 Russian nationals, along with three Russian businesses. Of all those indicted, five people have pleaded guilty"

"Friday’s charges are perhaps most important because they add compelling evidence to the claim that the Russian government engaged in a coordinated effort to hack U.S. servers — a contention that had been disputed by Trump and some of his allies"
Lol. Not even close.
 
Well fivethirtyeight.com just listed them out. I've cut and pasted it down below, and think the hyper links still work if you want to talk about sources or anyone in particular. And I cut and pasted a few of my favorite lines here at the top. I know this is inconvenient for you to believe, but this isn't going away. Even if Dems don't have the numbers to impeach, this is going to be an anchor on his administration.


"It’s a large number considering that the investigation has been active for only 14 months. So far, Mueller has filed charges against five American, one Dutch and 26 Russian nationals, along with three Russian businesses. Of all those indicted, five people have pleaded guilty"

"Friday’s charges are perhaps most important because they add compelling evidence to the claim that the Russian government engaged in a coordinated effort to hack U.S. servers — a contention that had been disputed by Trump and some of his allies"

Friday’s charges are perhaps most important because they add compelling evidence to the claim that the Russian government engaged in a coordinated effort to hack U.S. servers — a contention that had been disputed by Trump and some of his allies. And although the indictments allege that someone close to the Trump campaign was in “regular contact” with one of the Russian hackers, we still don’t know whether members of the Trump campaign committed a crime by seeking or using the documents stolen by the Russians. The indictment also alleges that the hacked materials were seen as an opportunity for others, including an unnamed candidate for Congress who requested stolen documents about his or her opponent. In his statement, Rosenstein emphasized that the indictment does not, however, suggest that the hacking “affected any election result.”


So remind me Why this investigation/dragnet started again?
 
Back
Top