Poor response. You can do better. Focus on the financial aspect - I'm talking about subsidizing foreign students, I'm not talking about admissions. UCLA excludes also sorts of kids (even international applicants) if they don't have the money. See
Dos Equis's post above. Is UCLA fascist for doing so? Those kids in your kid's stem class are paying a ton. I have no problem with that.
Not to put words in your mouth, but it appears that you think it is OK to admit and subsidize an international applicant over a state resident because the international applicant is good at a sport. On the other hand, I think we should subsidize deserving California residents that are stellar students. UCLA seems to generally agree (which I did not know until Dos Equis's post), except apparently there is an exception at UCLA for athletes.