I don't really understand your point. I was talking about claims of fact checking and the fallacy of it. For example, who is fact checking facebook fact checkers. Facebook has admitted their fact checkers have used biased opinion as the basis for the fact checking.....funny huh. Factcheckers who aren't steeped in facts. Self licking ice cream cone.
Happens all the time, especially when people cherry pick data to make a point, intionally leaving out data that provides helpful context to allow someone to make a decision. Activists doctors are doing this all the time these days. You posted an analsysis from a Dr that didn't provide 100% of information needed to come to an unbiased conclusion. He has an agenda - well intentioned or not. The M&Ms on the Rogan show did the same thing. Funny how that happens..
What facts did FB's checkers get wrong, in your opinion?