I like the app - Ground News. You can click an article and it will categorize the org covering - it will also allow you to click to others and categorize them. It will also group the L/C/R and give % coverage, e.g. an article is getting coverage L/C/R 40%/40%/20% for example.
Ideology over facts? I prefer a site that fact-checks, I can discern the slant pretty easily.I like the app - Ground News. You can click an article and it will categorize the org covering - it will also allow you to click to others and categorize them. It will also group the L/C/R and give % coverage, e.g. an article is getting coverage L/C/R 40%/40%/20% for example.
Basically you can read the same news from any or all of 3 different perspectives. You can also see how one side is all over some items vs the other.
Ground News
From their front page
View attachment 12732
Who fact checks the fact checkers? If it's on the internet, it has a slant. To your point, discerning the slant is your own responsibility.Ideology over facts? I prefer a site that fact-checks, I can discern the slant pretty easily.
Who fact checks the fact checkers? If it's on the internet, it has a slant. To your point, discerning the slant is your own responsibility.
But I thought everything on the internet was true.
Who fact checks the fact checkers? If it's on the internet, it has a slant. To your point, discerning the slant is your own responsibility.
Who fact checks the fact checkers? If it's on the internet, it has a slant. To your point, discerning the slant is your own responsibility.
The funny thing is it looks like in the chart they struggled to find a true centrist. The BCC is not centrist. NPR and WSJ had to be broken up into news and opinion to fit there. RCP as a publisher is not centrist....only as an aggregator....it leans right. It's a stretch to call Newsweek centrist because they publish a few conservatives from time to time. But they no doubt found the centrist category lacking and wanted to put in as much in it as possible.
No doubt?
I don't really understand your point. I was talking about claims of fact checking and the fallacy of it. For example, who is fact checking facebook fact checkers. Facebook has admitted their fact checkers have used biased opinion as the basis for the fact checking.....funny huh. Factcheckers who aren't steeped in facts. Self licking ice cream cone.What does the Internet have to do with it? How are these publications behaving any differently than they did pre-Internet? Yellow journalism has existed before any of us were alive.
I like the app - Ground News. You can click an article and it will categorize the org covering - it will also allow you to click to others and categorize them. It will also group the L/C/R and give % coverage, e.g. an article is getting coverage L/C/R 40%/40%/20% for example.
Basically you can read the same news from any or all of 3 different perspectives. You can also see how one side is all over some items vs the other.
Ground News
From their front page
View attachment 12732
Carry water? I posted links to two non-partisan analyses of media bias. Didn't you read them? Or look at the pictures?
I'm guessing not, since you followed with criticism that they must be biased because they never post stories that make you feel good about your personal political positions.
This Espola is interesting Soul. My dd went through some soccer Doc shit and I got ripped for even asking a few questions about how a Doc should behave around young females learning to be the best of the best at 13 years old. The day of reckoning is fast approaching. Protect the children first and all will go well for you and your family. Allow children to be abused and you got Karma and a custom Millstone coming for your neck. Most fair minded men want to protect the kids. Game on!!! Now you know why they hate t so much. Dude comes out swinging with this epic blast, "My administrations #1 focus is to eradicate human trafficking and sex trafficking and organ trafficking. Watch this again.... 0:06 he starts with his war of words with all the losers who used kids for all sorts of evil. Look at CNN producers and all the others out there. Help protect the kids!!!Slither....
Slither....
You are a filthy snake.
I don't really understand your point. I was talking about claims of fact checking and the fallacy of it. For example, who is fact checking facebook fact checkers. Facebook has admitted their fact checkers have used biased opinion as the basis for the fact checking.....funny huh. Factcheckers who aren't steeped in facts. Self licking ice cream cone.
Happens all the time, especially when people cherry pick data to make a point, intionally leaving out data that provides helpful context to allow someone to make a decision. Activists doctors are doing this all the time these days. You posted an analsysis from a Dr that didn't provide 100% of information needed to come to an unbiased conclusion. He has an agenda - well intentioned or not. The M&Ms on the Rogan show did the same thing. Funny how that happens..
This Espola is interesting Soul. My dd went through some soccer Doc shit and I got ripped for even asking a few questions about how a Doc should behave around young females learning to be the best of the best at 13 years old. The day of reckoning is fast approaching. Protect the children first and all will go well for you and your family. Allow children to be abused and you got Karma and a custom Millstone coming for your neck. Most fair minded men want to protect the kids. Game on!!! Now you know why they hate t so much. Dude comes out swinging with this epic blast, "My administrations #1 focus is to eradicate human trafficking and sex trafficking and organ trafficking. Watch this again.... 0:06 he starts with his war of words with all the losers who used kids for all sorts of evil. Look at CNN producers and all the others out there. Help protect the kids!!!
![]()
Open your eyes - 6m film - please watch and share to loved ones
I cried..... Did you? https://t.me/disclosurehub/157www.bitchute.com
No ideaHow do they determine their ratings?
![]()
HOLD THE LINE - PREPARE FOR THE STORM MAGA - WHERE WE GO ONE WE GO ALL
Boggles the mind how many Earthlings remain blissfully unaware that this war has been raging behind the veil since 2016 and already won. Everything we are watching on MSM is intended to show you how bad it would have gotten if the patriots hadn't stepped up!www.bitchute.com