Vaccine

I'm not surprised that you quote those whiney little bitches.
Didn't I just see something about pots meeting kettles?

Remember a key tell of the left - they always do what they accuse others of doing. ( a classic Carlson)
 
For a person who says they were repub up until t came around...you sure love government intrusion.

I have yet to see you take a position contrary to less gov intervention.

The unrealized cap gains idea is terrible on a variety of levels. One would think that would be blindingly obvious.

I said I was a Republican until Nixon (and I recognized that error).
 
A friend of mine got summoned for jury duty in Ventura County. FYI, they are demanding to know your vaccination status. There is an option for decline to state but if called to sit I have no doubt she will be asked as part of voir dire what her vaccination status is. She plans to decline to state when asked....we'll see if the judge allows that to stick.

They are also telling people who won't wear masks they'll be pushed to a future date.
You present this like its a bad thing. My answer is "Hell no, I'm not vaccinated" (is it under penalty of perjury?).
 
Nope. The estate was in trouble without the move to LA and the accompanying bump in ‘unrealized’ value that could hypothetically be used to pay off the tax burden of the death/estate tax.

 
You are wrong.

@dad4 solved the mystery on day 1. It is the damn bars that cause the spread. You can be masked and vaxxed and be safe, but the bar down the street magically spreads the virus to everyone in the area.
You got it. Bars, restaurants, gyms, casinos, cruise ships, office buildings, and private homes.

Anywhere people breathe in the air that someone else recently breathed out.

Glad to hear you're understanding it now.
 
You got it. Bars, restaurants, gyms, casinos, cruise ships, office buildings, and private homes.

Anywhere people breathe in the air that someone else recently breathed out.

Glad to hear you're understanding it now.

So anywhere people work together or live together...ahhh....got it.
 
The Lancet study and commentary.....peakloads for vaxxed and unvaxxed were similar but vaxxed clearances were shorter (doesn't help if you live or work with someone)....breakthroughs mild....editorial states vaccine effect on reducing transmission is minimal but does exist....protection from infection lasts only 2-3 months. Current vaccines are therefore unlikely in and of themselves (at least without natural immunity) to make COVID go away


 
I said I was a Republican until Nixon (and I recognized that error).
First of all, call it what you want; Secondly, who gives a damn; Lastly, you're a grown-ass "man" freakishly lurking in a kids soccer forum without kids playing who turned into a weak-ass bedwetting schoolgirl over an elected US President.

I'd say Nixon is the least of your mental issues.

BTW, stuff the coocoo response.
 
Breakthrough infections on fully vaxxed people seem to provide as much protection as Moderna booster
 
The Lancet study and commentary.....peakloads for vaxxed and unvaxxed were similar but vaxxed clearances were shorter (doesn't help if you live or work with someone)....breakthroughs mild....editorial states vaccine effect on reducing transmission is minimal but does exist....protection from infection lasts only 2-3 months. Current vaccines are therefore unlikely in and of themselves (at least without natural immunity) to make COVID go away


Last sentence comes from Grace, not the article.

The article notes that one implication of the study is that we need higher vax rates. Grace decided to omit that part, assert the opposite herself, and pretend that her conclusion somehow came from Lancet.

Would you stop this? You repeatedly mix your own personal opinion in, as though it came from the actual scientists. It's either amazingly sloppy writing, or a deliberate attempt to pretend that your opinion has more support than it really does.
 

I feel well refuted by an article dated after the Charges had moved that states they don’t have to sell an interest in the team due to estate taxes. Thanks.
 
Last sentence comes from Grace, not the article.

The article notes that one implication of the study is that we need higher vax rates. Grace decided to omit that part, assert the opposite herself, and pretend that her conclusion somehow came from Lancet.

Would you stop this? You repeatedly mix your own personal opinion in, as though it came from the actual scientists. It's either amazingly sloppy writing, or a deliberate attempt to pretend that your opinion has more support than it really does.
A. No
B. I post the article you can read it and make up your own minds
C. Yes it’s sloppy. Don’t have time to spoon feed you. Doing a ton of things simultaneously. This forum is occupying maybe 10% of my attention. There is a period there for a reason.
D. I agree we need higher vax rates. Whether we can get them is another story as is whether we should do what we need to do to get them.
 
Back
Top