A moving essay on autism, COVID protocols, and the limitations of "trust the experts".
Ahh, yes, let's get those trespassers. Forget about everything else that matters to Americans. We are sitting on the edge of our seat waiting for these "coup" participants to be charged for crazy insurrection things like trespassing, theft, etc. Sure, there are valid charges being levied against the 684, but come on.
You crack me up. It's as if jb has rallied all of the angry old men, given them lecterns and microphones, and trained them to violenty whisper into them.
A moving essay on autism, COVID protocols, and the limitations of "trust the experts".
Your incredibly inconsistent when it comes to recognizing unfounded statements. Its almost as if its intentional.There are a lot of unfounded statements verging on fantasies in there.
As I read it, the post creates a misleading equivalence between income earned at a job and unrealized capital gains. My point is that you can't actually spend an unrealized capital gain as is stated in the post. Just making sure I am reading it correctly.I guess I miss your point -- how can you spend it without first realizing the capital gain or borrowing against it?
That's an unfounded statement, not just bordering on fantasy, but actual fantasy."But it is income in the sense that it allows you to spend $3 million, just as if you earned $3 million doing a job."
I see someone only read the first handful of paragraphs of the article.There are a lot of unfounded statements verging on fantasies in there.
Let me summarize: Bettelheim was insane, therefore all doctors are insane.
I have another point to make but I want to make sure I am reading it correctly as it appears to me to be blatantly misleading.That's an unfounded statement, not just bordering on fantasy, but actual fantasy.
It's 100% incorrect. Maybe the author has the same misguided idea like Dad4 that because you can borrow against it, it is somehow income. Borrowings are not income and any attempt by the left to somehow characterize it as such displays a fundamental misunderstanding or intentional ignorance of basic financial concepts.I have another point to make but I want to make sure I am reading it correctly as it appears to me to be blatantly misleading.
Your incredibly inconsistent when it comes to recognizing unfounded statements. Its almost as if its intentional.
I see someone only read the first handful of paragraphs of the article.
Yup. I see managers who love this kind power and enforcement. I got rebuked by a boss lady who told me mask or get out the other day. I also know other people who have had mental anguish and much stress because owners want them to be mask enforcers with no training. As Dale Harris used to say, 'This is whack."
It's 100% incorrect. Maybe the author has the same misguided idea like Dad4 that because you can borrow against it, it is somehow income. Borrowings are not income and any attempt by the left to somehow characterize it as such displays a fundamental misunderstanding or intentional ignorance of basic financial concepts.
Taxing unrealized cap gains is one of the worst ideas I have seen in a long time.
The claim is it will mainly affect the rich. Even if that were the case, it is bad policy.
What always happens though is when they go "after the rich" those policies AFFLICT most everyone else.
It is amazing people think that taxing unrealized cap gains would be a productive exercise.
Hence the word "maybe" in my statement.Just to clarify -- the ITEP article never mentions borrowing against unrealized capital gains.
Oh, and by the way fellas and Grace T; soon and very soon none of you WHO got the jabs will be fully vaccinated. Yup, true as the sun is rising right now in socal. You will need to get that booster to be considered "fully" vaccinated. I know, I know how you feel when goal post are moved, trust me. The only issue is this is not sports were talking about. This is about your life and your health. You should NOT be injecting experimental bat, beagle, human and monkey mix that is then mixed with magnets. All created by Dr. Fraud, Dr. Frances, Bill and others.
Hence the word "maybe" in my statement.Just to clarify -- the ITEP article never mentions borrowing against unrealized capital gains.