what-happened
GOLD
you mean like adults who are vaccinated? and boosted?And the people the children come in contact with? This is like a broken record . . . and further you must feel why should we try?
you mean like adults who are vaccinated? and boosted?And the people the children come in contact with? This is like a broken record . . . and further you must feel why should we try?
Who can't be vaccinated? Even people with DiGeorge syndrome and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome are getting vaccines and likely first in line for boosters. You act as if people who are severely immune comprimised are out walking around elementary schools with not a care in the world. Stick to you stats and stay away from medicine.You are ignoring the people who cannot be vaccinated.
Think severely compromised immune systems. People who for some reason just are not good at antibody creation.
(not everyone is of average health)
I'm all for interventions as long as you promise to provide substance.“Smoking mirrors”? You need an intervention.
You don't make policy based on the exception to the rule.You are ignoring the people who cannot be vaccinated.
Think severely compromised immune systems. People who for some reason just are not good at antibody creation.
(not everyone is of average health)
So the pandemic is having the effect of delaying cancer screening until it is too late AND creating heart problems. Shocking!! The two top causes of death getting help from COVID and the vaccines as COVID deaths hitch a ride. The masses are too scared and too dumb to look at the Science.![]()
Scandinavians curb Moderna shots for some younger patients
Scandinavian authorities have suspended or discouraged the use of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine in young people because of an increased risk of heart inflammation, a very rare side effect associated with the shot.apnews.com
Interventions are a euphemism for Socialism.I'm all for interventions as long as you promise to provide substance.
Dad et al enjoy worse case scenarios. Doom and gloom perpetuates their incessant elevation of "moral posturing over truth".Who can't be vaccinated? Even people with DiGeorge syndrome and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome are getting vaccines and likely first in line for boosters. You act as if people who are severely immune comprimised are out walking around elementary schools with not a care in the world. Stick to you stats and stay away from medicine.
I'm sure if you hopped on the CDC website, it would explain all of this. At a minimum, the CDC website does a good job of providing the average person easy to read information.
Vaccinating a healthy population with low to zero risk is foolish and a waste of time. But don't you worry, you'll soon get your wish. Tee up the fear campaign and parents will line up to vaccinate their healthy children under 12. It's unfortunate.
You seem to be assuming that, once you define “work”, your definition is automatically meaningful.Your reading comprehension is always so much weaker than your math.
I said you have to define what”work” means. It either meets the standard or it doesn’t. But it’s up to you to lay out that standard (which the complaint recently is that it shifted majorly with the arrival of the delta). We went from vaccines 95% effective at stopping transmission and it would be over by June to now we don’t really know (which is why you are back on masks on the vaccinated)
And having been caught in a thunderstorm which unexpectedly wiped out goalkeeper practice and team practices Monday, I don’t think most people would say weather forecasts “work” but again it depends on the definition.
All three statements are equally true, despite being completely inconsistent.
Wonder if the Corona virus knew about those stated goals for the immuno-comp'd. I'd say that after 55 million years, one of Corona's goals was to make it on to the most wanted list of the Lysol wipes container and spray can.Even then. If you have enough covid circulating to infect most 0-15 year olds, you also infect most immune compromised people.
Remember the goal was to get herd immunity without infecting the vulnerable.
Rashomon.
If we disagree on what is meant by "work" we can't have a reliable discussion on what we mean. We are essentially talking passed each other. Definitions are everything.
I thought Biden said he was going to fix the problem?Interesting that despite the vaccine we are on track for a worse year than last.
![]()
US reports highest weekly COVID-19 vaccinations since July 4
The United States has been facing a COVID-19 surge as the more contagious delta variant continues to spread.abcnews.go.com
One of the most troubling aspects to me has been the burden of proof requirements during this pandemic. The burden of proof should be on the ones that want to change the policy or have mandates. That hasn't happened. The burden of proof has been switched to the status quo having to prove that a policy won't work or is misguided. I believe this is a dangerous precedent.You don't make policy based on the exception to the rule.
You are always what about those that cannot be vaxxed? They make up a tiny percentage of the population.
One does not mandate kids be vaxxed, vaxx passports, etc etc like you want to deal with the exception to the rule (those that cannot get vaxxed).
That seems to escape you.
It also seems to escape you that the following is true.
-This thing is or will be endemic. One cannot go on for years and years worrying about the exception to the rule per say.
- If someone is vaxxed who cares about the non vaxxed. That is what your vaxx is for.
- If you look at the chart above with our without a vaxx the majority of people have no real risk
- And finally they keep coming out with better and better treatments for people falling ill.
The above statement is spot on.One of the most troubling aspects to me has been the burden of proof requirements during this pandemic. The burden of proof should be on the ones that want to change the policy or have mandates. That hasn't happened. The burden of proof has been switched to the status quo having to prove that a policy won't work or is misguided. I believe this is a dangerous precedent.
MasksWhat do you mean “something works or it doesn’t”?
Can you honestly not think of anything in the world which is only partly efffective? Mousetraps. Anti-lock brakes. Weather forecasts. Does this mean they are all useless?
You love your false dichotomy fallacy so much, you are insulting others for not copying it.
Let's check out how great FL is doing anecdotally...
One more thing which works halfway.Masks
The tyranny of tiny risk.More and more people are living alone and not in families.....
That, in conjunction with who has political power, is an explanation for why we were so willing to throw children under the bus during the pandemic....
![]()
Living alone and falling behind - Washington Examiner
As the family continues to fall apart, a growing segment of the population is poorer and lonelier than they were 30 years ago, according to a new paper published by the Pew Research Center on Tuesday. Almost 40% of adults age 25 to 54 lived alone in 2019, according to Pew, compared to just 29%www.washingtonexaminer.com
All while taking away peoples rights to due process.One of the most troubling aspects to me has been the burden of proof requirements during this pandemic. The burden of proof should be on the ones that want to change the policy or have mandates. That hasn't happened. The burden of proof has been switched to the status quo having to prove that a policy won't work or is misguided. I believe this is a dangerous precedent.