Yet another writer who can’t get their head around confidence intervals.
The confidence interval for cloth was wide. It included no effect. It included the same reduction as surgical masks.
So, if you insist on the 95% CI, you have to say:
”maybe cloth masks do nothing, and maybe they are every bit as good as surgical. We still don’t know.”
That is not at all satisfying, but it is an accurate description of the CI.
Or, you can go non-scientific and assume the average case: Either cloth and surgical can help, but cloth are only about half as good as surgical.
That’s what I did for personal use. N95 for short term indoor, cloth for outdoors but in person, and try very hard to avoid long term indoor situations.
The cloth for outdoors is the weak point. My guess is that the daily indoor prayer gatherings in Bangladesh placed a heavier burden on filtration, and therefore explain much of the difference between cloth and surgical. But that is only a guess. It may be that the next study shows that cloth are less effective even in outdoor settings, and I end up switching to surgical/N95 entirely.
You are vaccinated!....why at this point are you even wearing a cloth mask outdoors (yeah, I get it's "in person" but that presumably means picking up kiddo at the soccer field or while watching kiddo's game at scrimmage when not required)?
So you are wearing an N95 to the supermarket too?
And avoiding I assume all indoor dining, bars, airtravel, hotels again?
The n95 is an indication that you aren't doing this as a noble thing to control the virus (since this study you've weighted so much in seems to show surgical is sufficient for reducing the risk to others). But that you are doing it because you yourself are scared of catching the virus (even having acknowledge in another post you probably will at some point)?
So what's your personal off ramp? Assume Newsom loses the recall (yeah, I know unlikely) and it's not Meet Kevin and some R makes the mask mandates go largely away. When do you go back to normal personally? Because your behavior doesn't read like the science you've been defending....it reads like fear.