It isn't hard to research.
There has never been an rMNA vaccine used anywhere in the world prior to covid. There has been some studies on them. All phase 1 studies.
There has not been any long term studies on them.
So for instance one might ask if kids under 17 have no risk of covid, why mandate them to get vaccines until long term studies have been completed...right?
Here is an overview of the rMNA. Talking about how it is new and talking about a few trails that got to stage 1.
![]()
Want to Know More About mRNA Before Your COVID Jab?
A primer on the history, scope, and safety of mRNA vaccines and therapeuticswww.medpagetoday.com
Here is the CDC letting us know it is new.
![]()
Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines
Learn how mRNA vaccines trigger an immune response against COVID-19.www.cdc.gov
By they way when you talk anonymous, anti vaxx...I ask again...
What part of not knowing the long term affects of the vaccines do you disagree with? That is a reasonable question. That is not arguing DONT take it. But none the less. By definition on the covid vaccines there are no long term studies done on them. There cannot be since we are still in the short term.
We don't know for example....
Should pregnant women take it?
Should young children?
What about someone with X condition?
How does it react with medications people are taking for other health issues?
There are a whole host of unknowns.
Nobody knows.
That isn't an argument for NOT taking it by the way.
In the short term they have shown to have few issues. And have certainly helped the at risk groups.
However it is an entirely reasonable position to say...wait until we have studied it longer before we mandate people to take it.
Or is that somehow an anti vax or conspiratorial position to take?
The other hole is we don't know what impact on people who have had COVID before and whether they need the full dosage, just a booster, or are good to go for at least x amount of time.