Vaccine

Monkey News from CDC:
Have monkeypox? CDC advises no sex, but says masturbation 6 feet apart or virtual sex reduce risk
CDC says having sex with clothes on is another way to reduce risk of monkeypox transmission
 
2200 Spanish Politicians, Business leaders & Celebrities Got "FAKE JAB" & Bought FALSE Vaccine Certificates - Police Investigation Uncovered. - WorldNews INSIDER (wninsider.com)


Remember the posts about the 80/20 Vaccine trays with Saline?

Yep, it was true.

All these spineless Politicians ( United States ) have most likely
been receiving the same " treatments. Thus the surprise COVID
infections. And YES the Vaccines ( If you want to call them that )
are making everything worse. Who knows who got what and what
is in each vile.... Literal Crap shoot.
 
watfly said:
Nice to see a scientist that doesn't take himself too seriously. Welcome change from the arrogance of the last two years.
Click to expand...
The scientists are mostly the same.

It only strikes you as arrogant when one of them says something you don’t want to hear. I’m sure plenty of people also see climate scientists as arrogant, and for essentially the same reason.
 
dad4 said:
The scientists are mostly the same.
Click to expand...
BS. You even said the ones in the public eye are different from those working in the background. If you are unhappy that more of those in the background aren't better represented, blame the press who decides who to cover or the scientists who refuse to speak out. Also, it's more than a bit presumptuous to assume "scientists are mostly the same." If they are, it is an environment ripe for "group think" - which may explain some things.
 
kickingandscreaming said:
BS. You even said the ones in the public eye are different from those working in the background. If you are unhappy that more of those in the background aren't better represented, blame the press who decides who to cover or the scientists who refuse to speak out. Also, it's more than a bit presumptuous to assume "scientists are mostly the same." If they are, it is an environment ripe for "group think" - which may explain some things.
Click to expand...
Coocoo.
 
kickingandscreaming said:
BS. You even said the ones in the public eye are different from those working in the background. If you are unhappy that more of those in the background aren't better represented, blame the press who decides who to cover or the scientists who refuse to speak out. Also, it's more than a bit presumptuous to assume "scientists are mostly the same." If they are, it is an environment ripe for "group think" - which may explain some things.
Click to expand...
Did you think a scientist was going to step in to block publication of that “surfing risk from covid” article?

That’s not really how it works. There is a peer review process, but it doesn’t apply to local newspapers. If you want the peer reviewed version, that exists, too.

It’s like that in every field. There are serious statistics behind Man City’s latest trade. Then there are the sports reporters filling columns. The newspaper version isn’t very deep or very accurate there, either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top