Vaccine

To all criminals, you're being watched and surveillance like never before. The time to choose right or wrong is now and the good part in all this is you get to choose. We all know the TRUTH by now and it's up to each person to decide to be on the side of the TRUTH or the Lie. Criminals love their IPhone and so do the Good Guys. Some day this will all get better but we have to put away all those who choose to cheat, spy, lie and ruin other people's lives so they can have it all to themselves.

1654087125606.png
 
5 more days and I will be gone, I promise :) "Red Wave" is a new hit song that is climbing the charts. Happy Whacky Wednesday fellas and Grace T.
 
EvilGoalie 21 said:
Gandalf has no legit beef with the jury. He knew jurisdiction going in and he had voir dire just like any other prosecutor.

I followed this one closely since thought interesting, but I did it by reading the actual transcript (a lot of it at any rate) instead of the frothy media. Here's the thing. Gandalf had no real game. The Balrog humiliated him on the court. Gandalf had three witnesses that he had squeezed real hard and he thought he had it sewed up tight. But the Balrog just started pulling up and hitting three pointers on him. I mean, the Balrog's cross of Baker, if you can get the transcript, was devasting to Gandalf. His only witness to the only thing that was actually charged. You probably won't see that on Bitchute but that's how it was. So then Gandalf tried to get into this wide open evidentiary running game with the Balrog, very little of which factored into materiality at all. Gandalf was like maybe I can get this in and use it down the road. But turns out the Balrog loves himself a running game and was just taking it to the hoop on Gandalf during cross after cross over and over. And all that's in the public record too. And then when the jury asked for the taxi billing records that Gandalf tried to surpress that was just like MJ hanging on the rim and doing a tongue wag. So Gandalf only has himself to blame. He was playing out of league with shoddy prep. He'll get another shot at the Balrog with Danchenko, but he's got some wounds to lick closed first.
Click to expand...
TURLEY: “I mean, he is facing a jury that has three Clinton donors, an AOC donor, and a woman whose daughter is on the same sports team with Sussmann’s daughter. With the exception of randomly selecting people out of the DNC headquarters, you could not come up with a worse jury”
 
Desert Hound said:
TURLEY: “I mean, he is facing a jury that has three Clinton donors, an AOC donor, and a woman whose daughter is on the same sports team with Sussmann’s daughter. With the exception of randomly selecting people out of the DNC headquarters, you could not come up with a worse jury”
Click to expand...

So why did the prosecutor agree to place those jurors?
 
Desert Hound said:
I should have been a lifeguard.

www.dailywire.com

Los Angeles County Lifeguards Earn Mega Salaries

Some Los Angeles County lifeguards protecting California beachgoers are making a hefty salary. “This has been years in the making,” Adam Andrzejewski, founder and CEO of government spending tracker OpenTheBooks.com, told The Daily Wire. A recent report by OpenTheBooks.com found that some...
www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com
Click to expand...

I was expecting something in there about bonuses for vaccination status, but I didn't find it.
 
espola said:
So why did the prosecutor agree to place those jurors?
Click to expand...
To get Mr. Mook and others to spill the beans and to also SHOW America the TRUTH about how justice works in our country. It's not perfect and he was 100% not guilty. This is high stakes Chess Espola. You give up a Pawn or two to get the beans spilled. Plus, Sus was not guilty for many reasons. You can;t lie to your self for one and he was charged with lying to the FBI. Next question?
 
dad and other believers hit hardest.

Lancet finds masks didn't work.

So...basically back to where we started...and that is we have known for decades masks do little to stop respiratory viruses.

“Replicating the CDC study shows similar results; however, incorporating a larger sample and longer period showed no significant relationship between mask mandates and case rates,” the study finds. “These results persisted when using regression methods to control for differences across districts. Interpretation: School districts that choose to mandate masks are likely to be systematically different from those that do not in multiple, often unobserved, ways. We failed to establish a relationship between school masking and pediatric cases using the same methods but a larger, more nationally diverse population over a longer interval. Our study demonstrates that observational studies of interventions with small to moderate effect sizes are prone to bias caused by selection and omitted variables. Randomized studies can more reliably inform public health policy.”

townhall.com

New Lancet Study Destroys the CDC's Justification for School Mask Mandates

townhall.com townhall.com
 
Desert Hound said:
dad and other believers hit hardest.

Lancet finds masks didn't work.

So...basically back to where we started...and that is we have known for decades masks do little to stop respiratory viruses.

“Replicating the CDC study shows similar results; however, incorporating a larger sample and longer period showed no significant relationship between mask mandates and case rates,” the study finds. “These results persisted when using regression methods to control for differences across districts. Interpretation: School districts that choose to mandate masks are likely to be systematically different from those that do not in multiple, often unobserved, ways. We failed to establish a relationship between school masking and pediatric cases using the same methods but a larger, more nationally diverse population over a longer interval. Our study demonstrates that observational studies of interventions with small to moderate effect sizes are prone to bias caused by selection and omitted variables. Randomized studies can more reliably inform public health policy.”

townhall.com

New Lancet Study Destroys the CDC's Justification for School Mask Mandates

townhall.com townhall.com
Click to expand...

The article was concerned with mask mandates, not the masks themselves.

And "we have known for decades masks do little to stop respiratory viruses" is entirely a fabrication.
 
Desert Hound said:
dad and other believers hit hardest.

Lancet finds masks didn't work.

So...basically back to where we started...and that is we have known for decades masks do little to stop respiratory viruses.

“Replicating the CDC study shows similar results; however, incorporating a larger sample and longer period showed no significant relationship between mask mandates and case rates,” the study finds. “These results persisted when using regression methods to control for differences across districts. Interpretation: School districts that choose to mandate masks are likely to be systematically different from those that do not in multiple, often unobserved, ways. We failed to establish a relationship between school masking and pediatric cases using the same methods but a larger, more nationally diverse population over a longer interval. Our study demonstrates that observational studies of interventions with small to moderate effect sizes are prone to bias caused by selection and omitted variables. Randomized studies can more reliably inform public health policy.”

townhall.com

New Lancet Study Destroys the CDC's Justification for School Mask Mandates

townhall.com townhall.com
Click to expand...
Correct me if I'm wrong but the various agencies didn't have data or studies to support Covid policies when they were implemented and only tried to justify them after the fact. And as this case illustrates, based on erroneous studies in some cases.
 
watfly said:
Correct me if I'm wrong but the various agencies didn't have data or studies to support Covid policies when they were implemented and only tried to justify them after the fact. And as this case illustrates, based on erroneous studies in some cases.
Click to expand...
That is exactly it.

Despite not having data supporting their position, they still instituted lockdowns, shuttered biz, closed schools, had people wear face diapers, etc.

And the data coming out keeps going in one direction.

The policies didn't work and in fact created great harm.
 
Trial of the Century News from Bill Barr:

“Complicated cases like this take a long time to build. They occur step-by-step and in secret. People don’t like that, but if they want people punished, that’s what it takes… If you want the facts, if you want a report, that can be done fairly quickly. If you want scalps, that takes time.”
 
crush said:
Trial of the Century News from Bill Barr:

“Complicated cases like this take a long time to build. They occur step-by-step and in secret. People don’t like that, but if they want people punished, that’s what it takes… If you want the facts, if you want a report, that can be done fairly quickly. If you want scalps, that takes time.”
Click to expand...

Hold it. Billy Barr? The flagellation guy? You sure that wasn't Liz Cheney that said that? Sounds like something Liz would say. She learned political infighting at her Daddy's knee. I bet she keeps a light gauge loaded up with 6 shot at the ready in her office. In case she flushes a covey. Most of those octogenarian Congress critters don't have much of a pelt left anyways. Can you imagine scalping Grassley? Kind of like the definition of a futile endeavor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top