Vaccine

espola said:
The news broke during the flight. If the pilot were more considerate of his passengers' wishes, he could have held off making the announcement until the plane had arrived, or just said nothing at all.
Click to expand...


Kinda like when you LIE !
 
espola said:
The news broke during the flight. If the pilot were more considerate of his passengers' wishes, he could have held off making the announcement until the plane had arrived, or just said nothing at all.
Click to expand...
Fair, but how should he decide which passengers' wishes to consider? Majority vote? Defer to the most fearful?

I can see an argument for not changing rules mid-flight. But its really irrelevant since your not required to keep your mask on 100% of the time anyway.
 
watfly said:
Fair, but how should he decide which passengers' wishes to consider? Majority vote? Defer to the most fearful?

I can see an argument for not changing rules mid-flight. But its really irrelevant since your not required to keep your mask on 100% of the time anyway.
Click to expand...

When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
When it comes to a mother’s children a “study” or select research from someone else’s opinion confirming source are meaningless.
Click to expand...
I agree. As I said, if a parent is concerned, take action. In this case, the mother should avoid being in places she views as unsafe. Mask mandates have never stopped the spread in the US. They are even less useful against the latest variants.
 
espola said:
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
Click to expand...

I can understand you point, but couldn't you make the same argument for someone who wanted to take their mask off? If the mandate changed during flight and they did not allow passengers to remove their mask, couldn't those people have a lawsuit as well?

The real problem is so many people are uneducated and don't really know what is going on
 
espola said:
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
Click to expand...
Well only an asshole would sue and if they did there is no basis for damages. Feeling uncomfortable is not sufficient to claim damages.
 
www.bitchute.com

Gilbert Gottfried told everyone vaccination was a matter of life and death. He was right. He died.

He pushed and advertised for mass vaccination sites that were open. All of these murder shills for the NWO and the Illuminati that die from these genocidal covid shots, good. I hope they burn in hell for convincing people to take this shit shot. Source: Fat News. More videos you might want to...
www.bitchute.com

The video is interesting take from Gilbert. I do not wish anyone to burn in hell. That's the dude who made the video comment, not mine, fyi
 
espola said:
In most states, and probably in the US Courts that would have jurisdiction over events occurring in interstate travel, emotional distress is adequate grounds for a lawsuit.
Click to expand...

Keyword being "emotional" - it is the principled foundation to all you lefties lunacy.
 
espola said:
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
Click to expand...

Does this include at the time every ticket was purchased, genius?
 
watfly said:
I wouldn't recommend that you take that case on contingency. You can thank me later.
Click to expand...

In my non-legal opinion, hiring a lawyer who can write the appropriate letter will result in a settlement in which the airline pays the lawyer for his time and the offended party gets something that cost the airline essentially nothing, like first-class upgrades on a few future flights.
 
watfly said:
Well only an asshole would sue and if they did there is no basis for damages. Feeling uncomfortable is not sufficient to claim damages.
Click to expand...
The mask rule changed because of a lawsuit, too.

To me, it’s all a sign that we are allowing administrators and judges to write the laws, instead of congress. Not a good trend. At least in theory, we can vote out a congressman or a president. Nothing we can do when a judge or justice decides he should be in charge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top