Vaccine

The news broke during the flight. If the pilot were more considerate of his passengers' wishes, he could have held off making the announcement until the plane had arrived, or just said nothing at all.


Kinda like when you LIE !
 
The news broke during the flight. If the pilot were more considerate of his passengers' wishes, he could have held off making the announcement until the plane had arrived, or just said nothing at all.
Fair, but how should he decide which passengers' wishes to consider? Majority vote? Defer to the most fearful?

I can see an argument for not changing rules mid-flight. But its really irrelevant since your not required to keep your mask on 100% of the time anyway.
 
Fair, but how should he decide which passengers' wishes to consider? Majority vote? Defer to the most fearful?

I can see an argument for not changing rules mid-flight. But its really irrelevant since your not required to keep your mask on 100% of the time anyway.

When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
 
When it comes to a mother’s children a “study” or select research from someone else’s opinion confirming source are meaningless.
I agree. As I said, if a parent is concerned, take action. In this case, the mother should avoid being in places she views as unsafe. Mask mandates have never stopped the spread in the US. They are even less useful against the latest variants.
 
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.

I can understand you point, but couldn't you make the same argument for someone who wanted to take their mask off? If the mandate changed during flight and they did not allow passengers to remove their mask, couldn't those people have a lawsuit as well?

The real problem is so many people are uneducated and don't really know what is going on
 
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
Well only an asshole would sue and if they did there is no basis for damages. Feeling uncomfortable is not sufficient to claim damages.
 

The video is interesting take from Gilbert. I do not wish anyone to burn in hell. That's the dude who made the video comment, not mine, fyi
 
In most states, and probably in the US Courts that would have jurisdiction over events occurring in interstate travel, emotional distress is adequate grounds for a lawsuit.

Keyword being "emotional" - it is the principled foundation to all you lefties lunacy.
 
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.

Does this include at the time every ticket was purchased, genius?
 
I wouldn't recommend that you take that case on contingency. You can thank me later.

In my non-legal opinion, hiring a lawyer who can write the appropriate letter will result in a settlement in which the airline pays the lawyer for his time and the offended party gets something that cost the airline essentially nothing, like first-class upgrades on a few future flights.
 
Well only an asshole would sue and if they did there is no basis for damages. Feeling uncomfortable is not sufficient to claim damages.
The mask rule changed because of a lawsuit, too.

To me, it’s all a sign that we are allowing administrators and judges to write the laws, instead of congress. Not a good trend. At least in theory, we can vote out a congressman or a president. Nothing we can do when a judge or justice decides he should be in charge.
 
Back
Top