Vaccine

It's states not cities, like FL and TX.
About half the population of Illinois is in the Chicago area. And over half the population of California is in the giant urban blob around LA.

If you are looking at disease and disease control measures, that’s what matters. The CA disease and economy results weren’t driven by Redding.
 
I am hearing about some gnarly 'Reptilian/Snake DNA" that got in some cocktails. If you find it easier to swim under water without coming up for a breath, then you might be part Reptilian now. I said this over two years ago, be careful what you inject in your blood. Please everyone, know what you take before you inject!


1649854619251.png
 
"Now a woman, for me, is handling your own but knowing how to cater to a man's needs. Right?''
"And I think a lot of times when you get that aesthetic of like, 'I'm a boss b----, I'm this, I'm that.'
"No, baby! You can't cook. You don't know when to be quiet. You don't know how to allow a man to lead."
 
There are think tanks running test groups, there are experts in data manipulation, there are scientists paid to skew research, there are media outlets looking for brand loyalty and more clicks etc etc. Navigating through that kind of gauntlet isn’t for the impressionable and weak minded. Speaking of, the internet and social media is packed with experts on a variety of subjects that decide what they want to believe despite what actual professionals and real life experts say. What a world we live in!
are you attempting to describe the CDC and the FDA?
 
are you attempting to describe the CDC and the FDA?
Excellent rebuttal Q. Did you hear about the snake venom? Bat, Monkey, Human, Bird and now Snake. The List keeps growing. No need to go to one of those Brazilian BBQ and all you can eat meat place. It's in the blood now. Plus plastic. Blood clot is the new normal. Bell Palsy is through the roof. Not fun when you can't feel half your face. I am praying for everyone you guys. All of us are in this together. I am here for those who need help or someone to talk to. We will get through this together.
 

People in line think this is normal, meaning that some unlucky person will have adverse reaction and you just hope your not one of the unlucky ones. If you play a high level sport that runs a lot, please have your blood looked at. My nephew just told me he has blood clots and it blocked his window heart and that is why he felt so much burining on his heart that he got to the hospital. His blood is like sludge and trying to make it through his body and in his brain. He is on blood thinner now and forever and he says he still has clots cruising in his blood. He ate too much meat you guys plus other unhealthy decisions, unhealthy medicine because he was obese and his Doc prescribed it all. He laughed at me and told me, "Crush, you were 100% right and I am all ears." I am going up with my wife to encourage him and teach him how to love food without meat. He also told me no more booze. He said when he was in ER and then ICU, he kept thinking about, "this is it" and "I am not ready to die. I am not ready to find out what's on the other side" and "Please God, give me another chance to do right and be right with you." He said sorry to me and I said sorry to him.
 
About half the population of Illinois is in the Chicago area. And over half the population of California is in the giant urban blob around LA.

If you are looking at disease and disease control measures, that’s what matters. The CA disease and economy results weren’t driven by Redding.

No, I'm looking at the study we are discussing. You did read the study, right? If so, you would know adjustments were made for population, age, obesity, diabetes - to name a few.
 
No, I'm looking at the study we are discussing. You did read the study, right? If so, you would know adjustments were made for population, age, obesity, diabetes - to name a few.
And as I mentioned those adjustments tended to work against red states in the study. Some favor smoke and red herrings over reality.
 
No, I'm looking at the study we are discussing. You did read the study, right? If so, you would know adjustments were made for population, age, obesity, diabetes - to name a few.
If I were trying to create a study to argue for red state covid policies, I also would correct for population, age, obesity and diabetes. (Watfly has it flipped on the last three. If something hyour side, correcting for it makes your side look better.)

I would not correct for population density, multi-family households, timing of first wave, or dominant variant.

They’re playing the game of “cheat at statistics“, and they’re playing it about five levels above your head.

And as I mentioned those adjustments tended to work against red states in the study. Some favor smoke and red herrings over reality.
You have it flipped. If group A has some disadvantage, then correcting for it makes group A look better.

Best example of this is Florida. Florida looks pretty bad on raw covid numbers. Their large elderly population puts them at a disadvantage. Once you correct for age, they look a lot better. The correction removed the disadvantage.

You could do the same thing for LA. LA has the disadvantage of multi-family low income households. If you correct for multi-family homes, LA will look better. Same thing: the correction removes the disadvantage.
 
If I were trying to create a study to argue for red state covid policies, I also would correct for population, age, obesity and diabetes. (Watfly has it flipped on the last three. If something hyour side, correcting for it makes your side look better.)

I would not correct for population density, multi-family households, timing of first wave, or dominant variant.

They’re playing the game of “cheat at statistics“, and they’re playing it about five levels above your head.


You have it flipped. If group A has some disadvantage, then correcting for it makes group A look better.

Best example of this is Florida. Florida looks pretty bad on raw covid numbers. Their large elderly population puts them at a disadvantage. Once you correct for age, they look a lot better. The correction removed the disadvantage.

You could do the same thing for LA. LA has the disadvantage of multi-family low income households. If you correct for multi-family homes, LA will look better. Same thing: the correction removes the disadvantage.
1649869702220.png
 
17 L.A. gangs have sent out crews to follow and rob city's wealthiest, LAPD says
L.A. gangs are sending out crews to prey on the mega-rich, targeting people leaving luxury boutiques, restaurants, and nightclubs, the LAPD said.

More than a dozen Los Angeles gangs are targeting some of the city's wealthiest residents in a new and aggressive manner, sending out crews in multiple cars to find, follow and rob people driving high-end vehicles or wearing expensive jewelry, according to police.

In many cases, they're making off with designer handbags, diamond-studded watches and other items worth tens of thousands of dollars — if not more — and then peddling them to black-market buyers who are willing to turn a blind eye to the underlying violence, police said.

This is insane you guys. One of wife's friends lives right next to Beverly Hills and is not that wealthy at all but her neighbors are super rich that live in BH. Two of them have been robbed at gun point the last month. Another one gives a guy money every week to keep him happy and to tell the others to back off. It's like her body guard so to be speak. All of them are moving. It's not safe anymore. People make $15 an hour and spend it all on gas and food. You used to be able to rent a room for $700. Not now. $1400 and this is in a rough area where others put up a tent and live rent free. My old neighbor in Temecula is renting out his one bedroom studio casita for $2300 a month. His mortgage is $1900. He lives in his huge house for free now and some other young couple is paying his mortgage. You can't make this up. Dude's house was worth $395,000 back in 2012 when he bought it at a discount and just got appraised for over $800,000. Nice pool and back yard and everyone is happy.
 
If I were trying to create a study to argue for red state covid policies, I also would correct for population, age, obesity and diabetes. (Watfly has it flipped on the last three. If something hyour side, correcting for it makes your side look better.)

I would not correct for population density, multi-family households, timing of first wave, or dominant variant.

They’re playing the game of “cheat at statistics“, and they’re playing it about five levels above your head.


You have it flipped. If group A has some disadvantage, then correcting for it makes group A look better.

Best example of this is Florida. Florida looks pretty bad on raw covid numbers. Their large elderly population puts them at a disadvantage. Once you correct for age, they look a lot better. The correction removed the disadvantage.

You could do the same thing for LA. LA has the disadvantage of multi-family low income households. If you correct for multi-family homes, LA will look better. Same thing: the correction removes the disadvantage.
Cherry picking again. Look at the actual results. For the top 10 overall there were 5 red states significantly disadvantaged by the study's Covid adjustments. There were 4 red states and the one blue state that were slightly advantaged by the studies adjustments.

Again more smoke and mirrors and red herrings.

I get it, you don't like the results, but don't mischaracterize what the results say. Studies are observations based on a particular methodology. Studies as we have found out aren't necessarily facts. Prospective studies are guesstimates at best. Historical studies have far more credibility. As of now you have failed to show that the Covid adjustments favored red states. Sorry but calling the study authors "wingnuts" or mischaracterizing the results of the study doesn't prove your case, it actually diminishes the credibility of your argument.
 
"They better fear ever coming after my kids. I'll let you come after me all you want to. You leave my family alone. We will die for our families. That's what they don't understand, these liberals and people running our country. There is a fierce love and dedication and responsibility that we have as parents that you step over that line and you start messing with my kid, there is no boundaries anymore between us...
Whatever look I have in my eye right now is because I know what I'm saying I'm feeling it down in my guts, that it is what tens of millions if not more Americans are feeling right now, regardless of their politics...You mess with our kids you've got a world of hurt coming your way this fall."
A father named John
 
Cherry picking again. Look at the actual results. For the top 10 overall there were 5 red states significantly disadvantaged by the study's Covid adjustments. There were 4 red states and the one blue state that were slightly advantaged by the studies adjustments.

Again more smoke and mirrors and red herrings.

I get it, you don't like the results, but don't mischaracterize what the results say. Studies are observations based on a particular methodology. Studies as we have found out aren't necessarily facts. Prospective studies are guesstimates at best. Historical studies have far more credibility. As of now you have failed to show that the Covid adjustments favored red states. Sorry but calling the study authors "wingnuts" or mischaracterizing the results of the study doesn't prove your case, it actually diminishes the credibility of your argument.

Two of the authors had established their wingnut reputations well before concocting this piece. You can look it up.

The third has only suggested that paid sick leave is a bad idea.
 
Back
Top